Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-14T02:54:35.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Physical Properties of a Hyaluronic Acid Based Bioresorbable Membrane for the Prevention of postsurgical Adhesions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

K. Greenawalt ,
L. Masi ,
C. Muir  and
J. Burns
K. Greenawalt
Affiliation:
Biopolymers Department, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139
L. Masi
Affiliation:
Biopolymers Department, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139
C. Muir
Affiliation:
Biopolymers Department, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139
J. Burns
Affiliation:
Biopolymers Department, Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

We have evaluated the physical properties and animal efficacy of a hyaluronic acid (HA) based bioresorbable membrane for the prevention of post-surgical adhesions. Test methods were developed to measure the dry and wet tensile properties and ia Xilm tissue adhesiveness of the membranes. The thin membranes were found to have sufficient strength and flexibility in the dry state for surgical handling. When hydrated in buffered saline, the membranes became weaker and more elastic. The membranes exhibited a high degree of tissue adhesiveness and significantly reduced adhesion formation in a rat cecal abrasion model.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 292: Symposium S – Biomolecular Materials , 1992 , 265
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Linsky, C. B. et al., Infert. 11,273 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Boyers, S. P. et al., Fertil. Steril. 49, 1066 (1988).Google Scholar
3. Bums, J. W., et al., Trans. Soc. Biomat., 17th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials 1991, 251.Google Scholar
4. Skinner, K., et al., J. Invest. Surg., 7th Annual Meeting of Academy of Surgical Research 1991, 381.Google Scholar
5. Bums, J. W., et al., U. S. Patent No. 5,017,229.Google Scholar
6. C, Robert.., et al., Acta. Pharm. Technol., 34(2), 95 (1988).Google Scholar