Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-10T17:51:48.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nuclear Repository Performance Assessment: Insights intoCritical Models and Parameters Affecting Projected FutureDoses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

R. K. Mcguire
Affiliation:
Risk Engineering, Inc., 4155 Darley Avenue, Suite A, Boulder, CO 80303
J. H. Kessler
Affiliation:
Electric Power Research Institute, P.O. Box 10412, Palo Alto, CA 94303
J. A. Vlasity
Affiliation:
Risk Engineering, Inc., 4155 Darley Avenue, Suite A, Boulder, CO 80303
Get access

Abstract

The Phase 3 Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) sponsored by theElectric Power Research Institute (EPRI) has led to new insights intocritical models and parameters affecting estimated doses to humans from apotential repository of high-level radioactive wastes at Yucca Mountain,Nevada. The Phase 3 model has been extended to encompass time-varyingclimate and infiltration, detailed modeling of the source term andhydrology, and detailed specification of possible interaction betweenpercolating ground water and waste containers. The model estimates doses toa time of one million years.

The three key radionuclides contributing to estimated total doses areTc-99,1–129, and Np-237. Five other nuclides contributing to dose in lesser(but significant) amounts are U-233, Th-229, Pa-231, Ac-227, and Se-79.These results are consistent with other TSPAs.

From sensitivity studies, the most critical models and parameters are asfollows. Infiltration and percolation assumptions, including the amount oflateral diversion of infiltration water, are important and need verificationwith site data and/or more detailed modeling. Parameters of the unsaturatedzone (UZ) and saturated zone (SZ) determine dilution and delay ofconcentrations and peak doses downstream. The fraction of containers thatbecome wet are not critical in our model, but this lack of sensitivityreflects our coupling of the fraction with a model of focused flow past thecontainers; an different model might indicate higher sensitivity. Also, thedegree of coupling between fracture and matrix flow is important inaffecting the times of peak doses but not their magnitudes.

Other critical design assumptions that could lead to reduced and/or delayeddoses are a more robust container design, a capillary barrier around eachcontainer, the dilution during hydrologie transport from the repository to apotential agricultural community downstream, and the characteristics of an“average” individual in that community who might receive a dose.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Electric Power Research Institute, Yucca Mountain total system performance assessment, Phase 3, EPRI TR-107191, December 1996.Google Scholar
2. Electric Power Research Institute, Biosphere modeling and dose assessment for Yucca Mountain, EPRI TR-107190, Palo Alto, CA, December 1996.Google Scholar
3. Electric Power Research Institute, Analysis and confirmation of robust performance for the flow-diversion barrier system at Yucca Mountain, EPRI TR-107189, November 1996.Google Scholar
4. Risk Engineering, Inc., Demonstration of a risk-based approach to high-level waste repository evaluation, Elec. Power Res. Inst., Rept. NP-7057, Palo Alto, CA, Oct. 1990.Google Scholar
5. Risk Engineering, Inc., Demonstration of a risk-based approach to high-level waste repository evaluation: phase 2, Elec. Power Res. Inst., Rept. TR-1000384, May 1992.Google Scholar
6. Sandia National Laboratories, Total system performance assessment for Yucca Mountain -SNL second iteration (TSPA-1993), SAND93–2675, 2 Vol, Albuquerque, NM, 1994.Google Scholar
7. TRW, Total system performance assessment -1995: an evaluation of the potential Yucca Mountain repository, US Dept. of Energy Rept. B00000000–01717–2200–00136, Rev. 1, Las Vegas, NV, Nov. 1995.Google Scholar