Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T03:56:17.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanical Properties of Ordered Fe-Al-X Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Ujjwal Prakash ,
Robert A. Buckley  and
Howard Jones
Ujjwal Prakash
Affiliation:
School of Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Robert A. Buckley
Affiliation:
School of Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Howard Jones
Affiliation:
School of Materials, University of Sheffield, Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK.
Get access

Abstract

Fe-Al-X alloys (X = Cr, Mo) in the composition range 50 to 80 at. % Fe, 0 to 20 at. % X were rapidly solidified by chill-block melt-spinning. As-spun and heat treated ribbons were characterised by optical and electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Strengthening mechanisms were identified using microhardness measurements. Tensile fracture surfaces of ribbons reveal ductile to cleavage to intergranular fracture transitions with increasing Al-content. An increasing preponderance of cleavage fracture with increasing ternary substitution for Fe was observed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 213: Symposium Q – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV , 1990 , 691
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Koch, C. C., Int. Met. Rev. 33, 201 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Stoloff, N. S., Int. Met. Rev., 24, 123 (1984).Google Scholar
3. Cullity, B. D., in Elements of X-ray diffraction, 2nd ed. (Addison Wesley, London, 1978), p394.Google Scholar
4. Prakash, U., PhD Thesis, Sheffield University, 1989.Google Scholar
5. Prakash, U., Buckley, R. A. and Jones, H., accepted for publication in Mat. Sci. and Eng. A.Google Scholar
6. Laine, A. and Lahteenmaki, I., J. Mat. Sci. 6, 1418 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Kirin, A., Tonejc, A. and Bonefacic, A., Scr. Met. 3, 943 (1969).Google Scholar
8. Muto, T. and Takagi, Y., Solid State Physics 1, 194 (1955).Google Scholar
9. Prakash, U., Buckley, R. A. and Jones, H., accepted for publication in Phil. Mag. A.Google Scholar
10. Nagpal, P. and Baker, I., Met. Trans. 21A, 2281 (1990).Google Scholar
11. Paris, D., Lesbats, D. and Levy, J., Scr. Met. 9, 1373 (1975).Google Scholar
12. Paris, D. and Lesbats, P., J. Nucl. Mat. 69, 628 (1972).Google Scholar
13. Marcinkowski, M. J. in Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, edited by Herman, H. (Acad. Press, NY, 1974), p181.Google Scholar
14. Stoloff, N. S. and Davies, R. G., Acta Met. 12, 473 (1964);Google Scholar
14a. Prog. Mat. Sci. 13, 1 (1966).Google Scholar
15. Marcinkowski, M. J. an Brown, N., J. Appl. Phys. 33, 537 (1962).Google Scholar
16. Crawford, R. C. and Ray, I. L. F., Phil. Mag. 35, 549 (1977).Google Scholar
17. Prakash, U., unpublished research.Google Scholar
18. Fortnum, R. T. and Mikkola, D. E., Mat. Sci and Engg. 91, 223, (1987)Google Scholar
19. Prakash, U., Buckley, R. A. and Jones, H., submitted to Phil. Mag. A.Google Scholar