Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-wlffp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T22:24:42.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leach Resistance Properties and Release Processes for Salt-Occluded Zeolite A

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

M. A. Lewis ,
D. F. Fischer  and
J. J. Laidler
M. A. Lewis
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439
D. F. Fischer
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439
J. J. Laidler
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Get access

Abstract

The pyrometallurgical processing of spent fuel from the Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) results in a waste of LiCI-KCI-NaCI salt containing approximately 10 wt% fission products, primarily CsCI and SrCI2. For disposal, this waste must be immobilized in a form that it is leach resistant. A salt-occluded zeolite has been identified as a potential waste form for the salt. Its leach resistance properties were investigated using powdered samples. The results were that strontium was not released and cesium had a low release, 0.056 g/m2 for the 56 day leach test. The initial release (within 7 days) of alkali metal cations was rapid and subsequent releases were much smaller. The releases of aluminum and silicon were 0.036 and 0.028 g/m2, respectively, and were constant. Neither alkali metal cation hydrolysis nor exchange between cations in the leachate and those in the zeolite was significant. Only sodium release followed t 0.5 kinetics. Selected dissolution of the occluded salt was the primary release process. These results confirm that salt-occluded zeolite has promise as the waste form for IFR pyroprocess salt.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 294: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVI , 1992 , 95
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Johnson, T. R., Lewis, M. A., Newman, A. E., and Laidler, J. J., “Treatment of High-Level Wastes from the IFR Fuel Cycle,” submitted to J. Am. Chem. Soc. Google Scholar
2. Pederson, L. R. in Chemical Implications of Heat and Radiation Damage in Rock Salt, edited by Jantzen, C. M., Stone, J. A., and Ewing, R. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 701–108.Google Scholar
3. Lewis, M. A., Fischer, D. F., and Smith, L. J., “Salt-Occluded Zeolites as an Immobilization Matrix for Chloride Waste Salt,” submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Google Scholar
4. Liquornik, M. and Marcus, Y., Israel J. Chem., 6, 115 (1968).Google Scholar
5. Liquornik, M. and Marcus, Y., J. Phys. Chem., 72, 2885 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Susic, M. V., Petranovic, N. A., and Mioc, D. A., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 33, 2667 (1971).Google Scholar
7. Barrer, R. M., J. Chem. Soc., 127 (1948).Google Scholar
8. Barrer, R. M. and Meier, W. M., J. Chem. Soc., 299 (1958).Google Scholar
9. Bunker, B. C. in Waste Glass Leaching: Chemistry and Kinetics, edited by Bates, J. K. and Seefeldt, W. B. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 84, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) pp. 493–507.Google Scholar
10. Jantzen, C. M., Bibler, N. E., Beam, D. C., Ramsey, W. G., and Waters, B. J., Standard Test Method Relative to Durability of Nuclear Waste Glasses: The Product Consistency Test (PCT). Savannah River Laboratory Report, WSRC-TR-90-539, Revision 2 (1991).Google Scholar
11. Barrer, R. M., Zeolites and Clay Minerals as Sorbents and Molecular Sieves, (Academic Press, London, 1978).Google Scholar
12. Hayward, P. J., Doern, D. C. and George, I. M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73, 544 (1990).Google Scholar
13. Cotton, F. A. and Wilkinson, G., Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, (Interscience, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
14. Liquornik, M., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 33, 283 (1971).Google Scholar
15. Clarke, D. R., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci., 13, 191 (1983).Google Scholar