Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T08:33:36.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Impurities and Microstructure on the Resistivity of LPCVD Titanium Nitride Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. J. Buiting  and
A. H. Reader
M. J. Buiting
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 80.000, 5600 JA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
A. H. Reader
Affiliation:
Philips Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 80.000, 5600 JA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The electrical resistivity of LPCVD TiN films deposited at temperatures between 450 and 700°C has been found to vary from about 900 to 150 μ Ωcm. The elemental composition (Ti:N), impurity content and the microstructure of the films have been investigated in order to explain the resistivity variation. It appears that this variation is directly related to the chlorine (impurity) content of the films. Films deposited at 700°C have both the lowest chlorine content and the lowest value of resistivity. Additionally the difference between the resistivity of this latter film and the (lower) value for bulk TiN is discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 168 , 1989 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Schintlmeister, W., Pacher, O. and Pfaffinger, K., J. Electrochem. Soc., 123, 924 (1976).Google Scholar
2.Nicolet, M.-A., Thin Solid Films, 52, 415 (1978).Google Scholar
3.Ostling, M., Nygren, S., Petersson, C.S., Norstrom, H., Buchta, R., Blom, H.-O. and Berg, S., Thin Solid Films, 145, 81 (1986).Google Scholar
4.Wittmer, M., Studer, B. and Melchior, H., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 5722 (1981).Google Scholar
5.Yokoyama, N., Hinode, K. and Homma, Y., Extended Abstract No. 466, Electrochemical Society, Fall meeting (Florida) 1989.Google Scholar
6.Kurtz, S.R. and Gordon, R.G., Thin Solid Films, 140, 277 (1986).Google Scholar
7.Schmitz, J.E.J., Suijker, J.L.G. and Buiting, M.J., in Tungsten and Other Refractory Metals for VLSI Applications IV, edited by Blewer, R.S. and McConia, C.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Conf. Proc. V–IV, Pittsburgh 1989), p. 211.Google Scholar
8.Buiting, M.J., Montree, A.H. and Otterloo, A.F., to be published.Google Scholar
9.Jacobs, J. W and Verhoeven, J.F., J. Microscopy 143, 103 (1986).Google Scholar
10.Doolittle, L.R., Nucl. Inst. Methods B15, 227 (1986).Google Scholar
11.Hensel, J.C., in Thin Films-Interfaces and Phenomena, edited by Nemanich, R., Ho, P. and Lau, S. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 54, Pittsburgh, 1986), p. 499.Google Scholar
12.Mayadas, A.F. and Shatzkes, M., Phys. Rev. B1, 1382 (1970).Google Scholar
13.Schmitz-Dumont, O. and Steinberg, K., Naturwissenschaften, 41, 117 (1954).Google Scholar