Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-mz6gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T05:49:50.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Film Thickness and Capping Layer on the Mechanical Properties of Copper Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R.-M. Keller ,
W.-M. Kuschke ,
A. Kretschmann ,
S. Bader ,
R.P. Vinci  and
E. Arzt
S. Bader
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung and University of Stuttgart
R.P. Vinci
Affiliation:
now at HP Integrated Circuit Business Division, Corvallis, OR 97330 Department of Materials Science and Eng., Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2205
Get access

Abstract

Substrate curvature and X-ray technique were used to study the mechanical properties of Cu films. Stress-temperature curves were measured using both methods. An additional analysis of the X-ray peak width allows us to estimate grain size and dislocation density as a function of temperature. It can be shown that a capping layer changes the mechanical properties of a Cu film strongly and that in capped films dislocation processes seem to be more important than diffusion at high temperatures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 391: Symposium T – Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V , 1995 , 309
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Flinn, P.A., J. Mater. Res. 6, 1498 (1991)Google Scholar
2 Vinci, R.P. and Bravman, J.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 309, 269 (1993)Google Scholar
3 Vinci, R.P., Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University, 1994 Google Scholar
4 Flinn, P.A., private communicationGoogle Scholar
5 Kuschke, W.-M. and E. Artz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1097 (1994)Google Scholar
6 Besser, P.R., Brennan, S. and Bravman, J.C., J. Mater. Res. 9, 13 (1994)Google Scholar
7 Tracy, D.P. and Knorr, D.B., J. Electron. Mater. 22, 611 (1993)Google Scholar
8 Zielinski, E.M., Vinci, R.P. and Bravman, J.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 338, 307 (1994)Google Scholar
9 Keller, R.-M., Bader, S., Vinci, R.P. and Arzt, E., to be published in Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 354 , (1994)Google Scholar
10 Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation (Springer Verlag, New York, 1987)Google Scholar
11 Stroppe, H. and Witzmann, D., Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Hochschule Otto von Guericke Magdeburg 13, 129 (1969)Google Scholar
12 Courtney, T.H., Mechanical Behavior of Materials (Mc Graw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, 1990), p. 171 Google Scholar
13 Venkatraman, R., Bravman, J.C., Nix, W.D., Davies, P.W., Flinn, P.A. and Fraser, D.B., J. Electron. Mater. 19, 1231 (1990)Google Scholar
14 Volpp, T., diploma thesis, Universität Stuttgart, 199Google Scholar