Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T08:02:21.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Compositional Changes on the Glass-Forming Ability of Y-Containing Mg Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2014

E. Eshed ,
M. Bamberger  and
A. Katsman
E. Eshed
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel Israel Institute of Metals, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
M. Bamberger
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
A. Katsman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion, Haifa 32000, Israel
Get access

Abstract

The effect of compositional changes on the glass forming ability of Mg alloys containing Y was studied. Four rapidly-solidified Mg-alloys were investigated: Mg91Y7.5La1.5, Mg85Y12La3, Mg86Y9.5Cu2.5La2 and Mg82Y11La4Eu3. XRD and DSC spectra revealed that the Mg86Y9.5Cu2.5La2 was the most amorphous out of the investigated alloys. A model based on a spinodal-like decomposition of a supercooled liquid alloy was developed. The model provides qualitative and quantitative explanation for the variation in glass forming ability.

Keywords

Mgamorphousalloy

Information

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1649: Symposium II – Bulk Metallic Glasses , 2014 , mrsf13-1649-ii03-08
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Telford, M., The Case for Bulk Metallic Glass, in Materials Today. 2004.Google Scholar
Gebert, A., Wolff, U., John, A., Eckert, J., Scripta Mater., 43, 279 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trexler, M.M., Thadhani, N.N.,. Progress in Materials Science, 55(8), 759 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, A., Masumoto, T., Mater. Sci. Engineer. A,. 173, 1 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, D., Lee, B.J., and Kim, N.J., Scripta Mater.,. 52(10), 969 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murty, B.S., Hono, K., Mater. Trans.,. 41(11), 1538 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebert, A., Rao, R.S., Wolff, U., Baunack, S., Eckert, J., Schultz, L., Mater. Sci. Engineer. A, 375-377, 280 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, G., Zhang, T., and Inoue, A., Mater. Letters, 58(24), 3012 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tkatch, V., Limanovskii, A., Denisenko, S., Rassolov, S., Mater. Sci. Engineer. A, 323(1-2), 91(2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öveçoğlu, M.L., Ünlü, N., Eruslu, N., Genç, A.;, Mater. Letters,. 57(21), 3296 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingson, R., Heben, M., Moleular and Condensed Matter Lab and PV Material and Device Physics Lab, The University of Toledo, 2011.Google Scholar
Bol'shov, L.A., Veshchunov, M.S., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 91, 1074 (1985).Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S., and Abinandanan, T.A., Bull. Mater. Sci., 26(1), 193 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yachnen, X., in Ames Laboratory, Iowa State University: Ames, 51 (1999).Google Scholar
Gale, W.F., Totemeir, T.C. Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004) p.2080.Google Scholar
Čermák, J., Stloukal, I., in Metal 2008 (17th Int. Metall. & Mater. Conf., Hradec nad Moravicí, Czech Republic, 2008).Google Scholar