Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-08T01:51:57.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grain Size and Chemical Composition Effects on the Grain Boundary Resistance of Ceria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xiao-Dong Zhou ,
Harlan U. Anderson  and
Wayne Huebner
Xiao-Dong Zhou
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Applied Research Center, Department of Ceramic Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO 65401, U. S. A.
Harlan U. Anderson
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Applied Research Center, Department of Ceramic Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO 65401, U. S. A.
Wayne Huebner
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Applied Research Center, Department of Ceramic Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO 65401, U. S. A.
Get access

Abstract

Studies related to the effects of grain size (30nm – 5.0μm) on the electrical conductivity of undoped CeO2 and Ce0.90Gd0.10O1.95 were performed. A series of impedance spectra as a function of temperature and grain size were analyzed. It was found that the ratio of the grain boundary resistance to the total resistance became lower with decreasing grain size, increasing temperature or increasing Gd content. For the case of Gd doped CeO2, the source of the grain boundary resistance may be due to the trapping of oxygen ions in the grain boundary area.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 730: Symposium V – Materials for Energy Storage, Generation, and Transport , 2002 , V4.4
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Inaba, H., and Tagawa, H., Solid State Ionics 83, 1, (1996).Google Scholar
2. Mogensen, M., Sammers, N. M., and Tompsett, G. A., Solid State Ionics 129, 63 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Steele, B. C. H., Solid State Ionics 129, 95 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Chang, E K., and Blumenthal, R. N., J. Solid State Chem. 72, 330 (1988)Google Scholar
5. Hwang, J.-H., and Mason, T. O., Z. Phys. Chem. (Munich) 207, S. 21 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Chiang, Y.-M., Lavik, E. B., Kosacki, I., Tuller, H. L., and Ying, J. Y., J. of Electroceram. 1, 7 (1997).Google Scholar
7. Zhou, X. D., Huebner, W. and Anderson, H. U., Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3814 (2002)Google Scholar
8. Tian, C. and Chan, S.-W., “Ionic Conductivities and Microstructures of CeO2:Y2O3 solid electrolytes,” Mat. Res. Soc Symp. Proc. Vol. 548, 623; and Grain Boundary Conductivities of 0.58% Y2O3 Doped CeO2 Thin Films, ibid, 629 (1999).Google Scholar
9. Zhou, X.-D., Huebner, W., Kosacki, I., and Anderson, H. U., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 85, 1757 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Aoki, M., Chiang, Y.-M., Kosacki, I., Lee, L. J., Tuller, H., and Liu, Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc 79, 1169 (1996).Google Scholar