Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-10T18:36:28.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatigue and Fracture of Nb3 AI/Nb In Situ Composites Based on an Nb 18 at.% Al Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1992

D.L. Davidson  and
D.L Anton
D.L. Davidson
Affiliation:
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78228
D.L Anton
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT 06108
Get access

Abstract

Near Nb3AI alloys, having Nb3Al with the ordered A15 crystalographic structure within regions of Nb solid solution, can be considered as in-situ reinforced composites. Nb-18 at.%AI ingots were arc melted and heat treated to provide several microstructures. Small compact tension specimens were cracked in compression- compression cyclic loading and subsequently grown in tension-tension cyclic loading. Fatigue crack growth rates were found to be similar to crack growth through a TiAI-based alloy with a lamellar microstructure. Threshold stress intensity factor was estimated as 5.3 MPaȡm, and fracture toughness as about 10 MPaȡm.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 288: Symposium L – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys V , 1992 , 807
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Anton, D.L. and Shah, D.M. in High Temperature Ordered Alloys III, Liu, C.T., et al., eds., Mat. Res. Soc. v. 133, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986, pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
2. Anton, D.L. and Shah, D.M. “Ductile Phase Toughening of Brittle Intermetallics” in Intermetallic Matrix Composites Anton, D.L., Martin, P.L., et al., eds., Mat. Res. Soc. v. 194, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar
3. Shah, D.M. and Anton, D.L., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A153 402 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Barth, E.P., Tien, J.K., Uejo, S. and Kambara, S., Mater. Sci. and Eng. A153, 398 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Menon, E.S.K., Subrarnanian, P.R. and Dimiduk, D.M., Scripta metall. mater. 27, 265 (1992).Google Scholar
6.Symposium Proceedings of High Performance Materials for SevereEnvironments, Inabe, K. and Shindo, S., eds., NEDO, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 28, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Marieb, T.N., et al. , in High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV, Johnson, L., et al. , eds., MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1991, pp.Google Scholar
8. Lundin, C.E., et al. , Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 236 863 (1966).Google Scholar
9. Cort, L., et al. , J. Less Common Metals, 44 215 (1976).Google Scholar
10. Davidson, D.L., Campbell, J.B. and Lankford, J., Acta metall.mater. 39, 1319 (1991).Google Scholar