Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T18:36:42.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrospun Gelatin/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Shane Catledge ,
Parul Tyagi ,
Mark Koopman ,
Andrei Stanishevsky  and
Yogesh K. Vohra
Shane Catledge
Affiliation:
catledge@uab.edu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Physics, 1300 University Blvd., 310 Campbell Hall, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, United States
Parul Tyagi
Affiliation:
ptyagi@uab.edu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Physics, 1300 University Blvd., 310 Campbell Hall, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, United States
Mark Koopman
Affiliation:
mkoopman@uab.edu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Materials Science and Engineering, BEC 1150 10th Ave. South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-4461, United States
Andrei Stanishevsky
Affiliation:
astan@uab.edu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Physics, 1300 University Blvd., 310 Campbell Hall, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, United States
Yogesh K. Vohra
Affiliation:
ykvohra@uab.edu, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Physics, 1300 University Blvd., 310 Campbell Hall, Birmingham, AL, 35294-1170, United States
Get access

Abstract

Electrospun composite scaffolds were prepared by mixing gelatin with nanoparticles of hydroxyapatite (nanoHA) in 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE) solution. The fibrous composite scaffolds with nanoHA content from 0 to 40 wt% were compared in terms of structure and morphology via x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results show that dispersion of nanoHA in the scaffolds is uniform for 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% nanoHA content, but significant nanoHA agglomeration can be observed for scaffolds with 40% nanoHA. In order to study the effect of nanoHA content on mechanical properties at the nanoscale level, the fibrous scaffolds were pressed into dense pellets and tested by nanoindentation to determine Young's modulus. Young's modulus was found to increase linearly with nanoHA content, reaching unexpectedly high values of 10.2 ± 0.8 GPa. Results are compared with other polymer/HA composites including those made with polycaprolactone or collagen.

Keywords

boneelastic propertiesnano-indentation

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1094: Symposium DD – From Biological Materials to Biomimetic Material Synthesis , 2008 , 1094-DD09-05
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Matthews, J. A., Boland, E. D., Wnek, G. E., Simpson, D. G., and Bowlin, G. L., J. Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 18, 125–134 (2003).10.1177/0883911503018002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Mo, X. M., Xu, C. Y., Kotaki, M., and Ramakrishna, S., Biomaterials 25, 1883–1890 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Zong, X., Ran, S., Kim, K. S., Fang, D., Hsiao, B. S., and Chu, B., Biomacromolecules 4, 416–423 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. and, M. Bognitzki Wendorff, J., Advanced Materials 13, 70 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Yoshimoto, H., Shin, Y. M., Terai, H., and Vacanti, J. P., Biomaterials 24, 2077–2082 (2003).10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00635-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Matthews, J. A., Wnek, G. E., Simpson, D. G., and Bowlin, G. L., Biomacromolecules 3, 232–238 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Huang, Z. M., Zhang, Y. Z., Ramakrishna, S. S, and Lim, C. T., Polymer 45, 5361–5368 (2004).10.1016/j.polymer.2004.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kim, H. W., Song, J. H., J.H., and Kim, H. E., Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1988–1994 (2005).10.1002/adfm.200500116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kozlov, P. V., Polymer 24, 651–666 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hellmich, C. and Ulm, F. J., J Biomech 35, 1199–1212 (2002).10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00080-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. and, D. T. Reilly Burstein, A. H., J Biomech 8, 393–405 (1975).Google Scholar
12. Sasaki, N. and Odajima, S., J. Biomech. 29 655–8 (1996).10.1016/0021-9290(95)00110-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar