Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-07T07:04:19.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Correlation Between Fibre Surface Energetics and Fibre-Matrix Adhesion in Carbon Fibre Reinforced Peek Composite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D J Hodge ,
B A Middlemiss  and
J A Peacock
D J Hodge
Affiliation:
ICI Wilton Materials Research Centre, PO Box 90, Wilton, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK
B A Middlemiss
Affiliation:
ICI Wilton Materials Research Centre, PO Box 90, Wilton, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK
J A Peacock
Affiliation:
ICI Wilton Materials Research Centre, PO Box 90, Wilton, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, UK
Get access

Abstract

Surface energies of carbon fibres at different levels at surface treatment have been determined by a wetting force technique and related to fibre-matrix adhesion in carbon fibre reinforced PEEK composite. The effect of oxidative surface treatment on the surface free energy is detailed, along with the changes in surface oxygen and nitrogen content, as determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The work of adhesion has been calculated for the carbon fibres and thermoplastic, which correlate well with experimental determination of interfacial strength. The technique can therefore be used to predict adhesion levels in fibre reinforced composites.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 170: Symposium N – Interfaces in Composites , 1989 , 327
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Denison, P, Jones, F R and Watts, J F, J. Mat. Sci. 20, 4647 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Kaelble, D H, Dynes, D.J and Cirlin, E H, J. Adhesion, 6, 23 (1974).Google Scholar
3 Dynes, P J and Kaelble, D H, J. Adhesion, 6, 195 (1974).Google Scholar
4 Drzal, L T, Hescher, J A and Hall, D T, Carbon, 17, 375 (1979).Google Scholar
5 Rance, D G, in Industrial Adhesion Problems, edited by Brewis, D M and Briggs, D (Orbital Press, 1985), p 48.Google Scholar
6 Fife, B, Barlow, C Y, and Peacock, J A, Sixth International Conference for Composite Materials (ICCM-Vl), 5, 439 (1987).Google Scholar