Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-10T20:36:54.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Casting Doubt: Economic and Technological Considerations Regarding Metal Casting in the Ancient World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Jack. M. Ogden
Jack. M. Ogden*
Affiliation:
Independent Art Research Ltd, 2 D'Arblay Street, London W1V 3FD, UK
Get access

Abstract

The lost wax casting technique is almost impossible to use if the finished object must be of a specified weight or must utilize all of a given batch of metal. This basic fact helps to explain why Old World ancient gold jewelry, particularly of Hellenistic, Roman and Byzantine origin, is almost always-hand wrought rather than cast. Similar considerations relate to the manufacture of copper-alloy weights or other objects which appear to be of pre-determined weight.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 185: Symposium G – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II , 1990 , 713
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Maryon, H., Metalwork and Enamelling, 5th Edition, (New York, 1971) p. 200.Google Scholar
2. Smith, C.S., in Application of Science in Examination of Works of Art, (Proceeding of the Seminar: September 7 - 16, 1965, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1965) pp. 20 -52.Google Scholar
3. Norton, J.T., in Application of Science in Examination of Works of Art, (Proceeding of the Seminar: September 7 - 16, 1965, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1965) pp. 13–19.Google Scholar
4. Austen, R.L., Gems and Jewels, (London, 1979) p. 15, caption to figure. This fibula is in the British Museum, no. 1376.Google Scholar
5. Hunt, L.B., Gold Bulletin, 13 (2), 63–79 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Athanaissopoulos, F., Banou, E., Barchi, N.E., Ellis, M., McCallum, L.R, Nash, J.A., and Orr, C.G., AJA, 87 (4), 547–48 (1983).Google Scholar
7. The relationship between patron and jeweller, and the economics of the jewelry trade, will be considered in J.M. Ogden, Gold Jewellery in Ptolemaic, Roman and Byzantine Egypt, Forthcoming.Google Scholar
8. Plaut. Men., act 3, scene 3.Google Scholar
9. P. Mich. 218.Google Scholar
10. Artem. 2.5.Google Scholar
11. Gauricus, P., de Sculptura. Relevant parts tranlated in Maclagan, E.R.D., Hill, G.F., and Bell, C.F., Burlington Fine Arts Club: Catalogue of a Collection of Italian Renaissance Sculpture and Other Plastic Art of the Renaissance, (London, 1913), p. 13.Google Scholar