Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-11T22:06:45.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Target-Substrate Bias on Pulsed Laser Deposited Yba2Cu307-6

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

D.B. Chrisey ,
J.S. Horwitz ,
K.S. Grabowski ,
M.E. Reeves ,
M.S. Osofsky  and
C.R. Gossett
D.B. Chrisey
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
J.S. Horwitz
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
K.S. Grabowski
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
M.E. Reeves
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
M.S. Osofsky
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
C.R. Gossett
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C. 20375‐5000
Get access

Abstract

We have deposited YBa2Cu307.$ thin films onto <100> SrTi03 substrates at 700°C as a function of target‐substrate bias (0 to 300 V) in order to make use of the positive ions in the laser produced plume to assist in the deposition. The films were extensively characterized to determine differences in film properties (composition, structure, and transport). The results suggest that film properties were optimized at or near a target‐substrate bias of 100 V, although, the differences in film properties were within the margin of reproducibility.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Inam, A., Hegde, M.S., Wu, X.D., Venkatesan, T., England, P., Miceli, P.F., Chase, E.W., Chang, C.C., Tarascon, J.M. and Wachtman, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 908 (1988).Google Scholar
2 Roas, B., Schultz, L. and Endres, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 1557 (1989).Google Scholar
3 Zheng, J.P., Huang, Z.Q., Shaw, D.T., and Kwok, H.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 280 (1989).Google Scholar
4 Venkatesan, T., Wu, X.D., Inam, A., Jeon, Y., Croft, M., Chase, E.W., Chang, C.C., Wachtman, J.B., Odom, R.W., Radicati di Brozolo, F., and Magee, C.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 1431 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Witanchchi, S., Kwok, H.S., Wang, X.W., and Shaw, D.T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 234 (1988).Google Scholar
6 Singh, R.K., Narayan, J., Singh, A.K., and Krishnaswamy, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54 2271 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Hubler, G.K., Carosella, C.A., Donovan, E.P., Van Vechten, D., Bassel, R.H., Andreadis, T.D., Rosen, M., and Mueller, G.P., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. (in press).Google Scholar
8 Grabowski, K.S., Chrisey, D.B., Horwitz, J.S., Osofsky, M.S., and Gossett, C.R. (in preparation).Google Scholar
9 Classsen, J.H., IEEE Trans, on Mag. 21 2233 (1989).Google Scholar
10 Venkatesan, T., Wu, X.D., Inam, A., and Wachtman, J.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 1193.Google Scholar
11 Brighton, D.R. and Hubler, G.K, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B28 527 (1987).Google Scholar
12 Hirsch, E.H. and Varga, I.K., Thin Sol. Films 69 (1980) 99; E.H. Hirsch and I.K. Varga, Thin Sol. Films 52 (1978) 445.Google Scholar