Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T05:44:44.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

iCONNECT Club: Integrated CONtinuum and NEtwork Approach to Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

David Holton ,
Lee J Hartley ,
Aimo Hautojärvi ,
Paul Marschall  and
Jan-Olof Selroos
David Holton
Affiliation:
Serco Assurance
Lee J Hartley
Affiliation:
Serco Assurance
Aimo Hautojärvi
Affiliation:
POSIVA Oy
Paul Marschall
Affiliation:
NAGRA
Jan-Olof Selroos
Affiliation:
SKB
Get access

Abstract

Models of groundwater flow and transport are routinely used as part of the safety assessment of a site, and increasingly to aid the site investigation strategy and design of a proposed repository. This emphasis puts greater demands on those models to reflect a higher level of realism to incorporate additional information in the vicinity of the repository. This paper describes a successful approach to incorporate these different scales, from canister- to regional-scale, within one model. Such an approach is able to resolve the details of groundwater flow around the waste packages in the overall hydrological setting of the site.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 755
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Degan, G (1994). Water Resources Research, 30:3327–2226.Google Scholar
2. Serco Assurance, 2002. www.connectflow.com. Google Scholar
3. Holton, D and Milický, M, 1997. SKB ICR 97–05, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
4. Gylling, B., Walker, D. and Hartley, L., 1999. SKB TR-99–18, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
5. Marsic, N., and Hartley, L., 2000. SKB R-00–14, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
6. Poteri, A, 1996. SKB ICR 96–01, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
7. Follin, S, and Hermanson, J., 1996. SKB Report, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
8. Uchida, M., Doe, T., Dershowitz, W., Thomas, A., Wallmann, P. and Sawada, A., 1994. SKB International Cooperation Report ICR 94–09, SKB, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
9. Dershowitz, W, Eiben, T, Follin, S and Andersson, A, 1999. SKB R-99–43, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co., Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
10. Jackson, C.P., Hoch, A.R. and Todman, S.. 2000. Water Resour. Res., 36(1), 189.Google Scholar