Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-09T07:20:20.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Development of the Jantzen - Plodinec Model of GlassDurability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

B. A. Shakhmatkin
Affiliation:
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Odoevskogo Str. 24/2, St. Petersburg, 199155, Russia, natalia@termex.spb.su
N. M. Vedishcheva
Affiliation:
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Odoevskogo Str. 24/2, St. Petersburg, 199155, Russia, natalia@termex.spb.su
A. S. Aloy
Affiliation:
Khlopin Radium Institute, 2nd Murinski Av. 28, St. Petersburg, 194021, Russia
M. J. Plodinec
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Savannah River Co., PO Box 616, Aiken, SC 29802
S. L. Marra
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Savannah River Co., PO Box 616, Aiken, SC 29802
Get access

Abstract

The hydration thermodynamic approach to the prediction of glass durabilitywas originally applied to nuclear waste glasses by Jantzen and Plodinec.This approach is useful for control of the production of nuclear wasteglasses. However, improvements are necessary if the approach is to beextended to different glasses, particularly those with higher alkali metalconcentrations. This is of special significance for vitrification of thesalt wastes at Hanford. Various methods for improving the predictive powerof the approach have been examined. Combining a more accurate representationof the alkali metal species in the glass with a more rigorous thermodynamicapproach is a promising avenue to improved predictive power.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Jantzen, C. M. and Plodinec, M. J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 67, 207 (1984).10.1016/0022-3093(84)90151-0Google Scholar
2. Shakhmatkin, B. A., Vedishcheva, N. M., Shultz, M. M., and Wright, A. C., J. Non-Cryst Solids, 177, 249 (1994).10.1016/0022-3093(94)90538-XGoogle Scholar
3. Shakhmatkin, B. A. and Shultz, M. M., Fiz. Khim. Stekla, 6, 129 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Mazurin, O. V., Streltsina, M. V. and Shvaiko-Shvaikovskaya, T. P., The Properties of Glasses and Glass-forming Melts, edited by Leko, V. K. and Nemilov, S. V., Nauka, Leningrad, 1973, vol. 1, p. 257.Google Scholar
5. Maekawa, H., Maekawa, T., Kawamura, K., Yokakawa, T., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 127, 53 (1991).10.1016/0022-3093(91)90400-ZGoogle Scholar
6. Plante, E. R., Bonnel, D. W., Hastie, J. W., in Advances in the Fusion of Glasses, (NY State College of Ceramics, Alfred, NY, 1988), p. 26.1–26.18.Google Scholar