Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T10:38:41.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of an interfacial layer on stress relaxation mechanisms active in the Cu–Si thin film system during thermal cycling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2020

Nalla Somaiah ,
Anwesha Kanjilal  and
Praveen Kumar
Nalla Somaiah
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India
Anwesha Kanjilal
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India
Praveen Kumar*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India
*
Address all correspondence to Praveen Kumar at praveenk@iisc.ac.in
Get access

Abstract

The authors report effects of placing a very thin metallic interlayer, such as W and Ni, in between the Cu film and the Si substrate on cyclic thermal stress-induced interfacial sliding and hillock growth in Cu. Cu–Si samples with no interlayer were the most prone to both interfacial sliding and hillock growth, whereas samples with the Ni interlayer were the most resistant against these deleterious phenomena. While the rate of interfacial sliding decreased with each consecutive thermal cycle, hillocks continued to grow undeterred. The obtained experimental results are discussed, considering the compressive stress field generated in the Cu film.

Information

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 164 - 172
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Suo, Z.: Reliability of interconnect structures. In Volume 8: Interfacial and Nanoscale Failure, Comprehensive Structural Integrity (I. Milne, R.O. Ritchie and B. Karihaloo, Editors-in-Chief), edited by Gerberich, W. and Yang, W. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003) pp. 265–324.Google Scholar
2.Shamiryan, D., Abell, T., Iacopi, F., and Maex, K.: Low-k dielectric materials. Mater. Today 7, 34–39 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Dorner, M.F. and Nix, W.D.: Stresses and deformation processes in thin films on substrates. CRC Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 14, 225–267 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fridline, D.: Finite element modeling of electromigration and stress voiding in microelectronic interconnects. Ph.D. thesis, Brown University, 2001.Google Scholar
5.Korhonen, M.A., Paszkiet, C.A., and Li, C.Y.: Mechanisms of thermal stress relaxation and stress induced voiding in narrow aluminum based metallizations. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 8083–8095 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sauter, A.I. and Nix, W.D.: Thermal stresses in Al lines bonded to substrates. IEEE Trans. Compd. Hybrids Manuf. Technol. 15, 594–600 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hutchinson, J.W. and Suo, Z.: Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. Adv. Appl. Mech. 29, 163–191 (1992).Google Scholar
8.Tohmyoh, H., Yasuda, M., and Saka, M.: Controlling Ag whisker growth using very thin metallic films. Scr. Mater. 63, 289–292 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kosinova, A., Wang, D., Schaaf, P., Sharma, A., Klinger, L., and Rabkin, E.: Whiskers growth in thin passivated Au films. Acta Mater. 149, 154–163 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Chen, M.W. and Dutta, I.: Atomic force microscopy study of plastic deformation and interfacial sliding in Al thin film: Si substrate systems due to thermal cycling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4298–4300 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Dutta, I., Chen, M.W., Peterson, K.A., and Shultz, T.: Plastic deformation and interfacial sliding in Al and Cu thin film: Si substrate systems due to thermal cycling. J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1537–1548 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kumar, P. and Dutta, I.: Influence of electric current on diffusionally accommodated sliding at hetero-interfaces. Acta Mater. 59, 2096–2108 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kumar, P. and Dutta, I.: Effect of substrate surface on electromigration-induced sliding at hetero-interfaces. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 46, 155303 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Peterson, K.A., Dutta, I., and Chen, M.W.: Diffusionally accommodated interfacial sliding in metal-silicon systems. Acta Mater. 51, 2831–2846 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kim, D.K., Nix, W.D., Vinci, R.P., Deal, M.D., and Plumer, J.D.: Study of the effect of grain boundary migration on hillock formation in Al thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 781–788 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Burkhard, M., Kuwano, S., Fujita, T., Dutta, I., and Chen, M.W.: Correlation between whisker growth, dissolution pitting and Si precipitation in an Al thin film on Si during heat treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 45, 3367–3374 (2010).Google Scholar
17.Jagtap, P., Chakraborty, A., Eisenlohr, P., and Kumar, P.: Identification of whisker grain in Sn coatings by analyzing crystallographic micro-texture using electron back-scatter diffraction. Acta Mater. 134, 346–359 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Jagtap, P., Sethuraman, V., and Kumar, P.: Critical evaluation of relative importance of stress and stress gradient in whisker growth in Sn coatings. J. Electron. Mater. 47, 5229–5242 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dutta, I., Kumar, P., and Bakir, M.S.: Interface-related reliability challenges in 3-D interconnect system with through-silicon vias. JOM 63, 70–77 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Kumar, P., Dutta, I., and Bakir, M.S.: Interfacial effects during thermal cycling of Cu-filled through-silicon vias (TSV). J. Electron. Mater. 41, 322–335 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Zschech, E., Engelmann, H.J., Meyer, M.A., Kahlert, V., Vairagar, A.V., Mhaisalkar, S.G., Ahila, K., Yan, M.Y., Tu, K.N., and Sukharev, V.: Effect of interface strength on electromigration-induced inlaid copper interconnect degradation: experiment and simulation. Z. Metallkd. 96, 966–971 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Brandes, E.A. and Brook, G.B. (Eds): Smithells Metals Reference Book. 7th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
23.Vijayakumar, M., Sriramamurthy, A.M., and Naidu, S.V.N.: Calculated phase diagram of Cu–W, Ag–W and Au–W binary system. Calphad 12, 177–184 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Josell, D., Weihs, T.P., and Gao, H.: Diffusional creep: stresses and strain rates in thin films and multilayers. MRS Bull. 27, 39–44 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Okamoto, N., Wang, F., and Watanabe, T.: Adhesion of electrodeposited copper, nickel and silver films on copper, nickel and silver substrates. Mater. Trans. 45, 3330–3333 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Jagtap, P., Narayan, P.R., and Kumar, P.: Effect of substrate composition on whisker growth in Sn coatings. J. Electron. Mater. 47, 4177–4189 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar