Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2001
In 1829, at the height of Lord William Bentinck's regime of reform, a keenyoung civil servant in north India took onone of the last of the Company's nabobs and won. It was a clash of a newstyle of Haileybury civilian with an oldCompany servant which remarkably prefigured the personal and philosophicaldynamics of the Anglicist-Orientalisteducation debate a few years later. Sir Edward Colebrooke, Bt, was Residentof Delhi, 67 years old and nearly 50years in the East India Company's service. His youthful adversary was hisown first assistant, Charles Edward Trevelyan, aged 22 and, in Sir Edward'swords, ‘a Boy just escaped from school’. In June 1829 Trevelyan chargedColebrooke with corruption, and despite being cut by many of Delhi'sEuropean residents, saw the prosecution throughto its conclusion some six months later when the Governor-General in Councilwas pleased to order Colebrooke'ssuspension from the service, a sentence ultimately confirmed by the Court ofDirectors.