Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5kfdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T03:49:52.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The constitution of some Egyptian clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

G. M. Gad  and
L. R. Barrett
G. M. Gad
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
L. R. Barrett
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Egyptian clays under consideration are obtained from two different localities. The Aswan clays are mainly concentrated in the neighbourhood of Aswan town in Upper Egypt and the Sinai kaolins from the Sinai Peninsula. The Aswan clays, namely: red Aswan clay, white Aswan clay, and siliceous Aswan clay, are transported clays, while Aswan kaolin is a residual clay. The Sinai kaolins are of obscure origin but most probably are transported clays. As is shown later, these are alunite-bearing clays not previously recorded in Egypt.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 28 , Issue 205 , June 1949 , pp. 587 - 597
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Trostel, (L. J.) and Wynke, (D. J.), 1940. Determination of quartz (free silica) in refractory clays. Journ. Amer. Ceramic Soc., vol. 23, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
2. Grimshaw, (R. W.), Westerman, (A.), and Roberts, (A. L.), 1948. Thermal effects accompanying the inversion of silica. Trans. Brit. Ceramic Soc., vol. 47, pp. 269–279.Google Scholar
3. Grim, (R. E.), 1939. Relation of composition to properties of clay. Joum. Amer. Ceramic Soc., vol. 22, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar
4. Hendricks, (S. B.), 1945. Base exchange of crystalline silicates. Journ. Ind. Eng. Chem., vol. 37, pp. 625–630.Google Scholar
5. Bray, (R. H.) and Willhlte, (F. M.), 1929. Determination of total replaceable bases in softs. Ind. Eng. Chem. (Anal.) vol. 1, p. 144.Google Scholar
6. Schollenberger, (C. J.) and Dreibelbis, (F. R.), 1930. Analytical methods in base exchange investigations on soils. Soil Sci., vol. 30, pp. 161–173.Google Scholar
7. Ross, (C. S.) and Kerr, (P. F.), 1934. Halloysite and allophane. Prof. paper U.S. Geol. Surv. 185-G, pp. 135–148. [M.A. 6–136.]Google Scholar
8. Grimshaw, (R. W.), Heaton, (E.), and Roberts, (A. L.), 1945. The constitution of refractory clays. Trans. Brit. Ceramic Soc., vol. 44, pp. 69–92.Google Scholar
9. Brindley, (G. W.) and Robinson, (K.), 1946. The structure of kaolinite. Min. Mag., vol. 27, pp. 242–253.Google Scholar
10. Brindley, (G. W.) and Robinson, (K.), 1947, X-ray study of some kaolinite flreclays. Trans. Brit. Ceramic Soc., vol. 46, pp. 49–62. [M.A. 10–367.]Google Scholar
11. Brindley, (G. W.) and Robinson, (K.), 1946. Randomness in the structure of kaolinitic clay minerals. Trans. Faraday Soc., vol. 42-B, pp. 199–205 Google Scholar