Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-bvlk6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T11:49:41.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antithesis or regression?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

John W. Tukey
John W. Tukey
Affiliation:
Princeton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Research Notes
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 1957 , pp. 923 - 924
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Prepared in connexion with research sponsored by the U.S. Office of Naval Research.

References

REFERENCES

(1) Cochran, W. G. Use of IBM equipment in an investigation of the ‘truncated normal’ problem. Proceedings of the Research Forum (International Business Machines Corp., New York, 08 1946).Google Scholar
(2) Cochran, W. G. Sampling techniques (New York, 1953), especially pp. 148–9.Google Scholar
(3) Hammersley, J. M. and Mauldon, J. G. General principles of antithetic variates. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 52 (1956), 476–81.Google Scholar
(4) Hammersley, J. M. and Morton, K. W. A new Monte Carlo technique: antithetic variates. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 52 (1956), 449–75.Google Scholar
(5) Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N. and Madow, W. G. Sample survey methods and theory (New York, 1953), especially pp. 459–60 and 464 of vol. 1.Google Scholar
(6) Kahn, H. Use of different Monte Carlo sampling techniques. Symposium on Monte Carlo methods (ed. Meyer, H.) (New York, 1956), pp. 146–90.Google Scholar
(7) Kahn, H. and Marshall, A. W. Methods of reducing sample size in Monte Carlo calculations. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Amer. 1 (1953), 263–71.Google Scholar
(8) Mantel, N. An extension of the Buffon needle problem. Ann. Math. Statist. 24 (1954), 674–7.Google Scholar
(9) Yates, F. Sampling methods for censuses and surveys (London, 1949), especially pp. 155, 220, 258.Google Scholar