Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T12:47:06.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reintegrative Shaming, Procedural Justice, and Recidivism: The Engagement of Offenders' Psychological Mechanisms in the Canberra RISE Drinking-and-Driving Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tom R. Tyler ,
Lawrence Sherman ,
Heather Strang ,
Geoffrey C. Barnes  and
Daniel Woods
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advocates of restorative justice (RJ) hypothesize that the diversion of criminal cases to RJ conferences should be more effective in lowering the rate of reoffending than traditional prosecution in court processing because the conferences more effectively engage the psychological mechanisms of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice. This study uses longitudinal data from the drinking-and-driving study in the Australian Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) to evaluate the long-term impact of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice on support for the law and on later recidivism as assessed through the use of police records and by self-report. Analysis first suggests that there is no direct effect of experimental condition on later recidivism. However, it further suggests that both traditional court-based prosecution and RJ conferences increase support for the law and lower the rate of future reoffending when they engage the social psychological mechanisms of reintegrative shaming and procedural justice and thereby increase the legitimacy of the law. Hence, the results argue for the potential value of procedures such as the RJ conference but indicate that those procedures will only achieve their objectives if they are effectively designed and implemented.

Information

Type
Articles of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 553 - 586
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, Eliza, et al. (2001) Shame Management through Reintegration. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Francis A. (1981) The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Jill K., & Hayden, Robert M. (198081) “Questions of Validity and Drawing Conclusions from Simulation Studies in Procedural Justice,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Geoffrey C. (1999) Procedural Justice in Two Contexts: Testing the Fairness of Diversionary Conferencing for Intoxicated Drivers. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bonta, James, et al. (2006) “Restorative Justice and Recidivism: Promises Made, Promises Kept?,” in Sullivan, D. & Tifft, L., eds., Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Valerie (2003) Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob, et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavior Sciences, 3d ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Colquitt, Jason A., et al. (2001) “Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research,” 86 J. of Applied Psychology 425–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayden, Robert M. (1989) “Cultural Context and the Impact of Traffic Safety Legislation,” 23 Law & Society Rev. 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Gerry (2002) Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
Latimer, Jeff, et al. (2005) “The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis,” 85 The Prison J. 127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Erik (2003) “Introduction: The Utah Restorative Justice Conference,” 2003 Utah Law Rev. 1–14.Google Scholar
MacCoun, Robert J. (1993) “Drugs and the Law: A Psychological Analysis of Drug Prohibition,” 113 Psychological Bulletin 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mugford, Stephen (2003) “The Butterfly's Wing, Bread Pudding and Justice: The Relevance of Complexity Theory to ADR Processes,” 9 VCAT Mediation Newsletter 20–1.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kristina (2004) “The Role of Trust in Nurturing Compliance: A Study of Accused Tax Avoiders,” 28 Law and Human Behavior 187–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagin, Daniel S. (1998) “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century,” 23 Crime and Justice 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nugent, William R., et al. (2003) “Participation in Victim-Offender Mediation and the Prevalence and Severity of Subsequent Delinquent Behavior: A Meta-Analysis,” 2003 Utah Law Rev. 137–66.Google Scholar
Paternoster, Raymond, et al. (1997) “Do Fair Procedures Matter? The Effects of Procedural Justice on Spouse Assault,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 163–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulson, Barton (2003) “A Third Voice: A Review of Empirical Research on the Psychological Outcomes of Restorative Justice,” 2003 Utah Law Rev. 167–203.Google Scholar
Pruitt, Dean G., et al. (1993) “Long-Term Success in Mediation,” 17 Law and Human Behavior 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julian V., & Stalans, Loretta J. (2004) “Restorative Sentencing: Exploring the Views of the Public,” 17 Social Justice Research 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul, & Darley, John (1995) Justice, Liability, and Blame. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul, & Darley, John (1997) “The Utility of Desert,” 91 Northwestern University Law Rev. 453–99.Google Scholar
Roche, Declan (2003) Accountability in Restorative Justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W. (1993) “Defiance, Deterrence and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction,” 30 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 445–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., & Strang, Heather (2004) “Verdicts or Inventions? Interpreting Results from Randomized Controlled Experiments in Criminology,” 47 American Behavioral Scientist 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., et al. (2000) Recidivism Patterns in the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments. Canberra: Australian National University, RSSS, Centre for Restorative Justice.Google Scholar
Strang, Heather (2002) Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Heather, & Braithwaite, John (2000) Restorative Justice. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Strang, Heather, & Sherman, Lawrence W. (2006) “Restorative Justice to Reduce Victimization,” in Walsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P., eds., Preventing Crime: What Works for Children, Offenders, Victims and Places. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Dennis, & Tifft, Larry (2001) Restorative Justice: Healing the Foundations of Our Everyday Lives. Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.Google Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, & Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 513–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibaut, John, & Walker, Laurens (1975) Procedural Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Travis, Jeremy (2004) But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prison Reentry. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1988) “What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 103–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2000) “Social Justice: Outcome and Procedure,” 35 International J. of Psychology 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2003) “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law,” 30 Crime and Justice 283–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006a) Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (2006b) “Legitimacy and Legitimation,” 57 Annual Rev. of Psychology 375–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R., & Huo, Yuen J. (2002) Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Lind, E. Allan (1992) “A Relational Model of Authority in Groups,” 25 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 115–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Hirsch, Andrew, et al. (2003) Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms? Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Weitekamp, Elmar G. M., & Kerner, Hans-Jurgen (2002) Restorative Justice: Theoretical Foundations. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar