Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-g7ldn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T08:10:02.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contesting Professionalism: Legal Aid and Nonlawyers in England and Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Richard Moorhead ,
Avrom Sherr  and
Alan Paterson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Professions are granted a form of cartel that enables them to charge more than would arise in a free market on the assumption that they provide better quality and are more trustworthy than free-market actors would be. The theoretical assumption that lawyers are more competent than nonlawyers has given rise to significant formal protections for professions in many jurisdictions. Two testable propositions arise from this theory: (1) lawyers cost more, but (2) they deliver higher quality. It is a testing of these twin propositions that is the subject of this article, with well-triangulated data and a deeper understanding of the theoretical differences between lawyers and nonlawyers.

Information

Type
Of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 765 - 808
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. We also gratefully acknowledge Lisa Webley, Sarah Rogers, Lorraine Sherr, and the late Simon Domberger for their assistance on the original research. We would also like to thank the numerous lawyers, advisers, and legal aid staff who participated in our research but must, for obvious reasons, remain anonymous.

References

Abbot, Andrew (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labour. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1988) The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1989) American Lawyers. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
ABA Commission on Nonlawyer Practice (1995) Nonlawyer Activity in Law-Related Situations: A Report with Recommendations. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Bindman, Geoffrey (2002) “What Made Me a Legal Aid Lawyer?,” 29 J. of Law and Society 510–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, William A., & Vidmar, Neil (1989) Report to the Ontario Task Force on Independent Paralegals: An Empirical Profile of Independent Paralegals in the Province of Ontario. Windsor, Ontario: Windsor Law School.Google Scholar
Bottoms, Anthony E., & McClean, John (1976) Defendants in the Criminal Process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1987) “The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field,” 38 Hastings Law J. 814.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert, & Fenn, Paul (1987) “‘A Respectable Profession’? Sociological and Economic Perspectives on the Regulation of Professional Services,” 7 International J. of Law and Economics 51.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard V., & Baranek, Patricia M. (1982) The Ordering of Justice: A Study of Accused Persons as Dependants in the Criminal Process. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F. (2002) “Synthesising Socio-Legal Research: Lawyer-Client Relations as an Example,” 8 International J. of the Legal Profession 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, Bryant G. (1983) “Rethinking the Legal Profession's Approach to Collective Self-Improvement: Competence and the Consumer Perspective,” Wisconsin Law Rev. 639.Google Scholar
Genn, Hazel (1987) Hard Bargaining: Out of Court Settlement in Personal Injury Actions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Genn, Hazel (1999) Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think about Going to Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Genn, Hazel, & Genn, Yvette (1989) The Effectiveness of Representation at Tribunals, Report to the Lord Chancellor. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
Goriely, Tamara, et al. (2001) The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh: An Independent Evaluation. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1998) Legal Advocacy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1999) “The Professions Are Dead, Long Live the Professions: Legal Practice in a Postprofessional World,” 33 3 Law & Society Rev. 713–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord Chancellor's Department (1986) Legal Aid Efficiency Scrutiny. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
Lord Chancellor's Department (1995) Legal Aid—Targeting Need: The Future of Publicly Funded Help in Solving Legal Problems and Disputes in England and Wales. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
Lord Chancellor's Department (1998) Modernising Justice Cm 4155. London: Lord Chancellor's Department.Google Scholar
LECG (2001) Restrictions on Competition in the Provision of Professional Services: A Report for the Office of Fair Trading. London: Office of Fair Trading.Google Scholar
McConville, Mike, Hodges, Jacqueline, Bridges, Lee, & Pavlovic, Anna (1994) Standing Accused, The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhead, Richard, & Harding, Richard (2003) “Quality of Access? Specialist and Tolerance Work Under Civil Contracts,” forthcoming.Google Scholar
Moorhead, Richard (2001) “Third Way Regulation? Community Legal Service Partnerships,” 6 Modern Law Rev. 543–62.Google Scholar
Moorhead, Richard, Sarah, Rogers, & Sherr, Avrom (2000) Willing Blindness? OSS Complaints Handling Procedures. London: Law Society.Google Scholar
Moorhead, Richard, Sherr, Avrom, Webley, Lisa, Rogers, Sarah, Sherr, Lorraine, Paterson, Alan, & Domberger, Simon (2001) Quality and Cost: Final Report on the Contracting of Civil, Non-Family Advice and Assistance Pilot. Norwich, England: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond (1990) “Proletarianization or Bureaucratization: The Fall of the Professional?,” in Torstendahl, R. & Burrage, M., eds., The Formation of Professions—Knowledge, State and Strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Office of Fair Trading (2001) Competition in Professions, A Report by the Director General of Fair Trading. London: Office of Fair Trading.Google Scholar
Paterson, Alan A. (1990) Professional Competence in Legal Services. London: National Consumer Council.Google Scholar
Paterson, Alan A. (1996) “Professionalism and the Legal Services Market,” 3 International J. of the Legal Profession 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkin, Harold (1989) The Rise of the Professional Society: England Since 1880. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perkin, Harold (1996) The Third Revolution: Professional Elites in the Modern World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L. (1981) “Policing the Professional Monopoly: A Constitutional and Empirical Analysis of Unauthorised Practice Prohibitions,” 34 Stanford Law Rev. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherr, Avrom (1986) “Lawyers and Clients: The First Meeting,” 49 Modern Law Rev. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherr, Avrom, Moorhead, Richard, & Paterson, Alan (1994) Lawyers: The Quality Agenda: Volumes I and II. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger (1997) Justice: Redressing the Balance. London: Legal Action Group.Google Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary (1995) “Managerialism, and the Legal Profession: A New Professional Paradigm,” 2/3 International J. of the Legal Profession 15986.Google Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary (2002) Cost & Benefit of Quality Assurance Mechanisms in the Delivery of Public Funded Legal Services: Some Qualitative Views. Oxford: Paper presented to the Legal Services Research Centre Conference.Google Scholar
Steele, Jill, & Bull, Gillian (1996) Fast, Friendly and Expert? Legal Aid Franchising in Advice Agencies without Solicitors. London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Susskind, Richard (1996) The Future of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Toren, Nina A. (1975) “Deprofessionalization and Its Sources,” 2 Sociology of Work & Occupations 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, David, & Johnstone, Jennifer (1997) “The Industrialisation of Legal Practice and the Rise of the New Electric Lawyer: The Impact of Information Technology upon Legal Practice in the U.K.,” 25 International J. of Sociology of Law 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasoff, Fran R., Dobash, Emerson, & Harcus, D. (1990) The Impact of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985 on Solicitors' Divorce Practice. Edinburgh: Control Research Unit, Scottish Office.Google Scholar