Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-31T08:05:33.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Once More Unto the Breach: PostBehavioralist Approaches to Judicial Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Keith E. Whittington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 601 - 634
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berk, Gerald. 1994 Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brigham, John. 1996. The Constitution of Interests: Beyond the Politics of Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, Susan R. 1993. Beyond Instrumental Politics: The New Institutionalism, Legal Rhetoric, and Judicial Supremacy. Polity 25:445–59.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Cover, Albert D., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1990. Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model. American Political Science Review 84:525–34.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Songer, Donald R. 2000 Strategic Auditing in Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions. American Political Science Review 94:101–116.Google Scholar
Corwin, Edward S. 1940. The President: Office and Powers. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 1997. Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review 92:251–326.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B., and Tiller, Emerson H. 1998. Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals. Yale Law Journal 107:2155–76.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2:201–15.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest. American Political Science Review 55:763–72.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Law's Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack, Knight. 1996a. The Norm of Stare Decisis . American Journal of Political Science 40:1018–39.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack, Knight. 1996b. On the Struggle for Judicial Supremacy. Law and Society Review 30:87–120.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Jack, Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Hoekstra Lee Valerie, Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1998. Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Journal of Politics 60:801–18.Google Scholar
Eskridge, , William, N. Jr. 1991. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game. California Law Review 79:613–84.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter, Dietrich, Rueschemeyer, and Theda, Skocpol, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gely, Rafael, and Spiller, Pablo T. 1990. A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Statutory Decisions with Application to the State Farm and Grove City Cases. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations. 6:263–300.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1995. The Passive-Aggressive Virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the Problematic Establishment of Judicial Power. Constitutional Commentary 12:67–92.Google Scholar
Haines, Grove Charles. 1922. General Observations on the Effects of Personal, Political, and Economic Influences in the Decisions of Judges. Illinois Law Review 17:96–116.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hattam, Victoria C. 1993. Labor Visions and State Power: The Origins of Business Unionism in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Rile Clarissa. 1998. De-Facing Power. Polity 31:1–22.Google Scholar
Howard, J. Woodford Jr. 1968. On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice. American Political Science Review 62:43–56.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Ronald. 1994 The Supreme Court and Constitutional Theory, 1953–1993. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, Roderick D., and Mathew, McCubbins. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas R. 1999. Stare Decisis in Historical Perspective: From the Founding Era to the Rehnquist Court. Vanderbilt Law Review 52:647–735.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1993. On Positivism and Potted Plants: “Inferior” Judges and the Task of Constitutional Interpretation. Connecticut Law Review 25:843–52.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1969. The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, and Paul, Wahlbeck J. 1996. Strategic Policy Considerations and Voting Fluidity on the Burger Court. American Political Science Review. 90:581–92.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78:734–49.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1999. The New Historical Institutionalism: Taking the Promise Seriously. Law and Courts 9:15–16.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Terry, Sullivan, eds. 1987. Congress: Structure and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Terrence J. ed. 1996. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McNollgast, . 1994. Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation. Law and Contemporary Problems 57:3–37.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry. 1984. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science 28:739–77.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: John E. Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen. 1991. Belated Feudalism: Labor, the Law, and Liberal Development in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Stephen, Skowronek. 1994. Beyond the Iconography of Order: Notes for a “New” Institutionalism. In The Dynamics of American Politics: Approaches and Interpretations, ed. Larry, Dodd and Calvin, Jillson. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Christopher J. 1996. Foolish Consistency: On Equality, Integrity, and Justice in Stare Decisis. Yak Law Journal 105:2031–2115.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and Paul DiMaggio, J., eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Herman C. [1948] 1969. The Roosevelt Court: A Study in Judicial Politics and Values, 1937–1947. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Herman C. [1968. Public Law and Judicial Behavior. Journal of Politics 30:480–509.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and Sullivan, William M. 1988. Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1980. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions. American Political Science Review 75:432–47.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1959. Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon. 1963. From Public Law to Judicial Behavior. In Judicial Decision-Making, ed. Glendon, Schubert. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1996a. The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices. American Journal of Political Science 40:971–1003.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1996b. Norms, Dragons, and Stare Decisis: A Response. American Journal of Political Science 40:1064–82.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R., eds. 1995. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. 1995. Order and Change. Polity 28:91–96.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1988. Political Jurisprudence, the “New Institutionalism,” and the Future of Public Law. American Political Science Review; 82:89–108.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1992. If Politics Matters: Implications for a “New Institutionalism. Studies in American Political Development 6:1–36.Google Scholar
Songer, Donald R., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cameron, Charles M. 1994 The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions. American Journal of Political Science 38:673–96.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Kathleen, Thelen, and Frank, Longstreth. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar