Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T01:51:00.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confirmative Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Lani Guinier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lempert, Chambers, and Adams's study of the careers of three generations of students of color admitted to the University of Michigan Law School fills several important gaps in our knowledge about the consequences and implications of affirmative action protocols in law school admission. First, it provides empirical data for the argument that conventional test-based admission policies both mask and support deep flaws in the way we allocate opportunity and privilege.

Information

Type
“From The Trenches and Towers”
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2000 , pp. 565 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Amabile, Teresa. 1996. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (ABA). 1992. Legal Education and Professional Development–An Educational Continuum Report of the Task Force on Law Schools and the Profession: Narrowing the Gap. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Bowen, William, and Derek, Bok. 1998. The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequence of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard. 1991. Assessment in Context. In Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude , Achievement, and Instruction, ed. Gifford, B. R. and O'Connor, M. C. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 199798. Reframing the Affirmative Action Debate. Kentucky Law Journal 86:505–25.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 2000. Confirmative Action in a Multi-Racial Democracy. In State of Black America 2000. New York: National Urban League.Google Scholar
Guinier, Lani, Michelle, Fine, and Jane, Balin. 1997. Becoming Gentlemen: Women, Law Schools and Institutional Change. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Karabel, Jerome. 1999. What the Deserving Deserve and Whether They Get It. New York Times , 23 October, A19.Google Scholar
Kornhaber, Mindy L. 1999. Reconfiguring Admissions to Serve the Mission of Selective Public Higher Education. Typescript.Google Scholar
Kristoff, Nicholas. 1997. Where Children rule. New York Times , 17 August, p. 40, sec. 6.Google Scholar
Kristoff, Nicholas. 1998. Learning to Love School in the Summer: There's Cleanup. And All That Recess. New York Times , 16 August, WK7.Google Scholar
Lemann, Nicholas. 1999. The Big Test. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard O., Chambers, David A., and Terry Adams, K. 2000. Michigan's Minority Graduates in Practice: The River Runs Through Law School. Law and Social Inquiry 25:395–505.Google Scholar
Meisels, Samuel J. 19961997. Using Work Sampling in Authentic Assessments. Educational Leadership 54(4):60–65.Google Scholar
Perrone, Vito. 1991. Position Paper: On Standardized Testing. Childhood Education 67: 132–42.Google Scholar
Rhodes, H.T. Frank 1999. College by the Numbers. New York Times, 24 December, A23.Google Scholar
Russell, Thomas D. 2000. The Shape of the Michigan River as Viewed from the Land of Sweatt v. Painter and Hopwood . Law and Social Inquiry 25:507–519.Google Scholar
Selmi, Michael. 1995. Testing for Equality: Merit, Efficiency, and the Affirmative Action Debate. UCLA Law Review 42:1251–312.Google Scholar
Shipler, David K. 1995. My Equal Opportunity, Your Free Lunch. New York Times , 5 March, E1, E16.Google Scholar
Singham, Mano. 1998. The Canary in the Mine: The Acheivement Gap between Black and White Students. Phi Delta Kappan 80(1):9–15.Google Scholar
Steele, Claude. 1999. Thin Ice: “Stereotype Threat” and Black College Students. Atlantic Monthly, August, p. 44.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 1997. From Gladiators to Problem-solvers. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 4:119.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan, and Lani, Guinier 1996. The Future of Affirmative Action: Reclaiming the Innovative Ideal. California Law Review 84:953–1036.Google Scholar
Young, Michael. 1958. The Rise of the Meritocracy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Wallach, Michael A. 1985. Creativity Testing and Giftedness. In The Gifted and Talented: Developmental Perspectives, ed. Degen Horowitz, Frances and O'Brien, Marion. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 2000. Rollin' On the River: Race, Elite Schools, and the Equality Paradox. Law and Social Inquiry 25:527–556.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. 1989. Portfolio Assessment: Sampling Student Work. Educational Leadership 46(7) 35–39.Google Scholar