Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-9xpg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T13:19:34.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The synchrony and diachrony of differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2011

Cory Shain  and
Judith Tonhauser
Cory Shain
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Judith Tonhauser
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the synchrony and diachrony of differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní on the basis of a quantitative study of a corpus of naturally occurring data of the modern language and an investigation of object marking in a 17th-century catechism. We show that both animacy and topicality, but not definiteness, affect whether a direct object is marked in modern Guaraní, a finding that has implications for cross-linguistic theories of differential object marking, not all of which recognize topicality as a factor. We also find no categorical constraints on differential object marking in Guaraní, contrary to Bossong (1985b). Our study of the 17th-century catechism provides further support for Bossong's (1985b, 2009) claim that Guaraní did not have differential object marking when it came into contact with Spanish. The paper concludes with a discussion of the hypothesis that differential object marking in Guaraní resulted from contact with Spanish.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , October 2010 , pp. 321 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adelaar, Willem F. H. (1994). The nasal/oral distinction in Paraguayan Guaraní suffixes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Etnolingüísticos 8:125–133.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. (2003). Differential object marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3):435–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Anchieta, Joseph. (1595). Arte de grammatica da lingoa mais vsada na costa do Brasil. Coimbra: Antonio de Mariz.Google Scholar
de Aragona, Alonzo. (ca. 1625). Breve introducción para aprender la lengua guaraní. New edition edited by Meliá, Bartomeu and published in 2003 in Amerindia 4:23–61.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg. (1983–1984). Animacy and markedness in universal grammar. Glossologia 39(2–3):7–20.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg (1985a). Empirische Universalienforschung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg (1985b). Markierung von Aktantenfunktionen im Guaraní. In Plank, F. (ed.), Relational typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–29.Google Scholar
Bossong, Georg (2009). The typology of Tupi-Guarani as reflected in the grammars of Jesuit missionaries: Anchieta (1595), Aragona (c. 1625), Montoya (1640) and Restivo (1729). Historiographica Linguistica 36(2/3):225–258.Google Scholar
Bottignoli, Justo. (1926). Gramática Razonada de la Lengua Guaraní. Turin, Italy: Sociedad Editora Internacional.Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta, & Sankoff, David. (1974). Variable rules. Language 50:333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jinny K. (2000). [–person] direct object drop. Hispania 83:531–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jinny K. (2003). Language attitudes and the future of bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 6(2):81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dessaint, Michel. (1981). La langue Guaraní. Esquisse d'une typologie interne du Guaraní paraguayen contemporain. Ph.D. dissertation, Practical School of High Studies.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf. (1986). El idioma chiriguano. Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica. Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf (1993). Mbyá, guaraní, criollo y castellano. Signo & Seña 3:56–71.Google Scholar
Dietrich, Wolf (1995). El español del Paraguay en contacto con el guaraní. In Zimmerman, K. (ed.), Lenguas en contacto en Hispanoamérica. Frankfurt: Vervuert. 203–216.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1979). Ergativity. Language 55(1):59–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donellan, Keith S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75(3):281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22:1–26.Google Scholar
Epps, Patience. (2008). Hup's typological treasures. Linguistic Typology 12:169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García García, Marco. (2005). Differential object marking and informativeness. In Heusinger, K. von, Kaiser, G. A., & Stark, E. (eds.), Proceedings from the workshop “Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination in Romance.” Konstanz: Universität Konstanz. 17–31.Google Scholar
Gerner, Matthias. (2008). Ambiguity-driven differential object marking in Yongren Lolo. Lingua 118:296–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giménez Caballero, Ernesto. (1966). El yopará in Paraguay. In Congreso de Academias de la lengua española 4. Actas y labores (Buenos Aires, de 30 de nov. al 10 de dic. de 1964). 124–136.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Granda, Germán. (1996). Interferencia y convergencia sintáctica e isogramatismo amplio en el español paraguayo. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 117:63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregores, Emma, & Suárez, Jorge A. (1967). A Description of Colloquial Guaraní. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasch, Antonio. (1976). El idioma guaraní. Gramática y antologia de prosa y verso. 4th ed.Asunción: Loyola.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeannette K., Hedberg, Nancy, & Zacharski, Ron. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2):274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gynan, Shaw N. (2001). Language planning and policy in Paraguay. Current Issues in Language Planning 2(1):53–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus, & Kaiser, Georg A. (2003). The interaction of animacy, specificity, and definiteness in Spanish. In Heusinger, K. von, Kaiser, G. A., & Stark, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages.” Konstanz: Universität Konstanz. 41–65.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus, & Kaiser, Georg A. (2005). The evolution of differential object marking in Spanish. In von Heusinger, K., Kaiser, G. A., & Stark, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Specificity And The Evolution / Emergence of Nominal Determination Systems in Romance.” Universität Konstanz, Konstanz. 33–70.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus, & Kaiser, Georg A. (2007). Differential object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. In Kaiser, G. A. & Leonetti, M. (eds.), Proceedings of the workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages.” Konstanz: Universität Konstanz. 85–110.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaako. (1973). Grammar and logic. In Hintikka, J., Suppes, P., & Moravcsik, J. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel. 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Thompson, Sandra A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2):251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huonder, Anthony. (1912). Antonio Ruiz de Montoya. In The Catholic encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio. (2010). Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 34(2):239–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, Georgette. (1977). Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1(2):233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laca, Brenda. (1995). Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español. In Pensado, C. (ed.), El complemento directo preposicional. Madrid: Visor Libros. 61–91.Google Scholar
Laca, Brenda (2006). El objeto directo. La marcación preposicional. In Company, C. (ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Mexico City, Mexico: UNAM. 421–475.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. (2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3:75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Jeffrey. (2006). The grammar of accusative case in Kannada. Language 82(1):10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardale, Alexandru. (2008). Microvariation within differential object marking. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique (RRL) 53(4):449–467.Google Scholar
Martins, Marci Fileti. (2003). Descrição e análise de aspectos da gramática do Guarani Mbyá. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Mayer, Mercer. (1967). A Boy, a Dog and a Frog. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Educación y Cultura. (2004). La educación bilingüe en la reforma educativa Paraguaya. Available at: www.escuelaviva-mec.edu.py/investigaciones/60.pdf, accessed August 30, 2008.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. (1991). Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67:510–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Montoya, Antonio Ruiz. (1640a). Arte, y bocabulario de la lengva gvarani. Reprinted in 1878 by Julio Platzman, Liepzig.Google Scholar
de Montoya, Antonio Ruiz (1640b). Catecismo de la lengva gvarani. Reprinted in 1878 by Julio Platzman, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yukiko. (2002). Prominence mismatches and differential object marking in Bantu. In Butt, M. & King, T. H. (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference, National Technical University of Athens, Athens. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 292–314.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Marion. (1881). Between the Amazon and the Andes. London: Edward Stanford.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild. (2004). What markedness marks. Lingua 114:1186–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Næss, Åshild (2007). Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. (1972). Opacity, coreference and pronouns. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (eds.), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel. 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 223–255.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. (2003). Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(3):287–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Joan. (1985). The special relation of Guarani and Spanish in Paraguay. In Wolfson, N. & Manes, J. (eds.), Language of inequality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A., & Silva, Gláucia. (2002). Overt vs. null direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Hispania 85(3):577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shain, Cory. (2009). The distribution of differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní. M.A. thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Shokouhi, Hussein, & Kipka, Peter. (2003). A discourse study of Persian râ. Lingua 113:953–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Peter. (2007). Cross-linguistic variation in object marking. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Tippets, Ian, & Schwenter, Scott. (2007). Relative animacy and differential object marking in Spanish. Presented at NWAV 36, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, & Colijn, Erika. (2010). Word order in Paraguayan Guaraní. International Journal of American Linguistics 76:255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usher de Herreros, Beatriz. (1976). Castellano-Paraguayo. Notas para una gramática contrastiva Castellano-Guaraní. Asunción: Centro de Estudios Antropológicos.Google Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura. (1995). Noun incorporation and object placement in discourse: The case of Guaraní. In Downing, P. & Noonan, M. (eds.), Word order in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 555–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura (2002). Grammatical relations in active systems: The case of Guaraní. Functions of Language 9(2):133–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velázquez-Castillo, Maura (2004). Guaraní (Tupí-Guaraní). In Booij, G. E., Lehmann, C., Mugdan, J., & Skopeteas, S. (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An international handbook on inflection and word-formation. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1421–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Carletta, Jean, Garretson, Gregory, Bresnan, Joan, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, Nikitina, Tatiana, O'Connor, M. Catherine, & Wasow, Tom. (2004). Animacy encoding in English. In Webber, B. & Byron, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the ACL 2004 Workshop on Discourse Annotation. 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar