Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T17:01:07.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of social network in the acquisition of local dialect norms by Appalachian migrants in Ypsilanti, Michigan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2004

Betsy Evans
Betsy Evans
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research explores the extent to which the speech of Appalachian migrants in Ypsilanti, Michigan has been affected by the emerging local norm, an ongoing dialect change labeled the Northern Cities Shift (NCS). Recorded speech from these migrants was acoustically analyzed to determine whether the NCS feature of low-front vowel raising of was present. Index scores derived from formant values were then subjected to statistical analysis to determine the degree to which the respondents' use of this vowel reflects participation in the NCS. The respondents' use or nonuse of this feature was correlated with their sex, social status, age, and social network characteristics to determine which, if any, have influenced respondents' participation, or lack of participation, in the NCS. The results show that social network and sex are statistically significant predictors of acquisition, or lack of acquisition, of the feature in question, whereas age and socioeconomic status are not.This research is part of a National Science Foundation Grant titled “Accommodation in Language Variation and Change.” This research owes much to the support and commitment of Dennis Preston. I am also grateful to Diane Aleksa, Annabelle Mooney, and anonymous reviewers who provided valuable input on earlier versions of this article.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , July 2004 , pp. 153 - 167
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, John. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Human Relations 7(1):39–58.Google Scholar
Boissevain, Jeremy, & Mitchell, J. Clyde. (1973). Network analysis: Studies in human interaction. The Hague: Mouton.
Bortoni-Ricardo, Stella. (1985). The urbanization of rural dialect speakers: Sociolinguistic study in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bott, Elizabeth. (1957). Family and social network. London: Tavistock.
Callary, Robert. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4:155–170.Google Scholar
Caplan, Gerald. (1974). Support systems and community mental health: Lectures on concept development. New York: Behavioral Publications.
Carr, Lowell, & Stermer, James. (1952). Willow Run: A study of industrialization and cultural inadequacy. New York: Harper.
de Bot, Kees, & Stoessel, Saskia. (2002). Language change and social networks. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 153:1–7.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1986). The roles of high school social structure in phonological change. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Eckert, Penelope. (1989). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17: 183–208.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
Evans, Betsy, & Preston, Dennis. (2000). When being normal isn't nice. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 7.3:59–65.
Fasold, Ralph. (1969). A sociolinguistic study of the pronunciation of three vowels in Detroit speech. Washington, DC: Georgetown University mimeograph.
Feagin, Crawford. (1986). More evidence for a vowel change in the South. In David Sankoff (ed.), Diversity and diachrony. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 83–95.
Gal, Susan. (1979). Language and shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. New York: Academic.
Gordon, Matthew J. (1997). Urban sound change beyond the city limits: The spread of the Northern Cities Shift in Michigan. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan.
Gordon, Matthew J. (2000). Lower back trouble: Another look at the chronology of the Northern Cities Shift. New Ways of Analyzing Variation 29 conference, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Hillenbrand, James, & Getty, Laura, Clark, Michael, & Wheeler, Kimberlee. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97:3099–3111.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika. (1999). Diffusion of urban sound change: A case of the Northern Cities Shift. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Penelope Eckert (ed.), New ways of analyzing variation. New York: Academic. 1–44.
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (1997). A national map of regional dialects of American English. Telsur Project, Linguistics Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania.
Labov, William, Yeager, Malcah, & Steiner, Richard. (1972). A quantitative study of sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
Milroy, Lesley. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mitchell, J. Clyde. (1969). Social networks in urban situations. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Moreno, Jacob. (1953). Who shall survive?: Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and sociodrama. Beacon, NY: Beacon House.
Neary, Terence. (1977). Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Doctoral dissertation. University of Connecticut.
Peterson, Gordon, & Barney, Harold. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22:75–84.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis. (1996). Where the worst English is spoken. In E. Schneider (ed.), Focus on the USA. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 297–360.
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society, essays and addresses. London: Cohen and West.
Stevens, Kenneth N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stevens, Kenneth, & House, Arthur. (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 6:111–128.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robert, & Minkova, Donka. (1997). On drifts and shifts. Studia Anglica Posnaneisia 31:283–303.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). Sociolinguistic Aspects of Assimilations: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.