Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-01T07:20:53.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: Were/weren't leveling in a vernacular English variety

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Natalie Schilling-Estes  and
Walt Wolfram
Natalie Schilling-Estes
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Walt Wolfram
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the process of analogical leveling seems relatively straightforward and its directionality readily predictable, the existence of cross-dialectal leveling alternatives suggests that the processes that actuate and embed analogical leveling can actually be quite complex. Using the case of a vernacular variety spoken on the Outer Banks of North Carolina, we demonstrate how linguistic-systemic principles such as remorphologization, psycholinguistic principles of perceptual saliency, and sociolinguistic processes of symbolic identity converge to account for the development and maintenance of leveling to weren't (I/you/(s)he/we/ you/they weren't here) in this post-insular island community.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , October 1994 , pp. 273 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1987). Decreolization? Language in Society 16:449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie, & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (1989). Variation in subject-verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1:285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie, & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. (eds.). (1991). The emergence of Black English: Text and commentary. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Brandes, Paul D., & Brewer, Jeutonne. (1977). Dialect clash in America: Issues and answers. Metuchen: Scarecrow.Google Scholar
Brewer, Jeutonne. (1973). Subject concord of be in Early Black English. American Speech 48:5–21.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (1985). Morphology: A study of relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack. (1993). Vernacular roots. Paper presented at NWAV-XXII, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1982). Variation in an English dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christian, Donna, Wolfram, Walt, & Dube, Nanjo. (1988). Variation and change in geographically isolated communities: Appalachia English and Ozark English (PADS 74). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the White community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Harkers Island United Methodist women (compilers). (1991). Island born and bred: A collection of Markers Island food, fun, fact and fiction. Morehead City, NC: Herald.Google Scholar
Hazen, Kirk. (1994). Subject-verb concord in vernacular varieties of English. Master's thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. (1986). Principles of historical linguistics (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 34). Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howren, Robert. (1962). The speech of Ocracoke. American Speech 37:161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. (1978). Towards a theory of social dialect variation. Language in Society 7:17–36.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy. (1966). La nature des procès dits analogiques. In Hamp, E. P., Householder, F. W., & Austerlitz, R. (eds.), Readings in linguistics 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 158–174. (Reprinted from Acta Linguistica 5:17–34, 1947.)Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19:273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, J. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 28–53.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Cohen, Paul, Robins, Clarence, & Lewis, John. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education Final Report No. 3288.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold. (1978). Les lois du développement analogique. Linguistics 205:53–60.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Kenjirô. (1993). Dissecting analogical leveling quantitatively: The case of the innovative potential suffix in Tôkyô Japanese. Language Variation and Change 5:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynor, Natalie. (1988). Written records of spoken language: How reliable are they? In Thomas, A. (ed.), Methods in dialectology. London: Multilingual Matters. 109–119.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. (1989). Exploring the roots of Appalachian English. English World-Wide 10:227–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. (forthcoming). Trans-atlantic connections between varieties of English: The case of plural verbal -s. Journal of English Linguistics.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold, Sanderson, Stewart, & Widdowson, John. (1978). The linguistic atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann. (1970). Principles of the history of language. Translated by Strong, H.. College Park, MD: McGrath. (Original work published 1890.)Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas, & Algeo, John. (1993). The origins and development of the English language. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Roberts, Stephen, & Holt, Kay. (1984). Judgment land: The story of Salter Path, Book 1. Have-lock, NC: Bogue Sound.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (1993a). Alternative regularization patterns for past-tense be in a semi-isolated eastern coastal community. Paper presented at NWAV-XXII, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (1993b). Evidence and argument in the development of prenasal [z] → [d]. Master's thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.Google Scholar
Schumann, John H. (1978). The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1990). The dialects of England. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1990). Re-examining Vernacular Black English. Language 66:121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. (1991). Dialects and American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Christian, Donna. (1976). Appalachian speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Fasold, Ralph W. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (forthcoming). The Ocracoke brogue: History and description. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press and the Ocracoke Preservation Society.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Schilling-Estes, Natalie, Hazen, Kirk, & Craig, Chris. (forthcoming). On the sociolinguistic complexity of quasi-isolated coastal communities. In Bernstein, Cynthia, Nunnally, Thomas, & Sabino, Robin (eds.), Language variety in the South II. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt (with Schilling-Estes, Natalie, Hazen, Kirk, & Craig, Chris). (1993). The sociolinguistic vacation: Continuity and change in “quaint” island communities. Paper presented at NWAV-XXII, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold, & Pullum, Geoffrey. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language 59:502–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar