Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-4rns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T23:01:03.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Linguistic Semantics and Linguistic Subdisciplines: A Review Article - Charles J. Fillmore and D. Terrence Langendoen, eds, Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971. Pp. viii + 299. - Richard J. O'Brien, S.J., ed., Linguistics: Developments of the Sixties - View-points for the Seventies. (Report of the twenty-second annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1971. Pp. xiii + 316.

Review products

Charles J. Fillmore and D. Terrence Langendoen, eds, Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971. Pp. viii + 299.
Richard J. O'Brien, S.J., ed., Linguistics: Developments of the Sixties - View-points for the Seventies. (Report of the twenty-second annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1971. Pp. xiii + 316.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Joel Sherzer
Joel Sherzer
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1973 , pp. 269 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abrahams, R. D. (1970). Deep down in the jungle. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Berlin, B. & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Blom, J. & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 407–34.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. & Thorne, J. P. (1969). The Semantics of modal verbs. JL 5. 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Steinberg, D. D. and Jakobovits, L. A. (eds), Semantics. Cambridge: University Press. 583–256.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1964) An analysis of the interaction of language, topic and listener. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On Sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 213–50.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. (forthcoming). The lexical symbol and its non-arbitrariness. In Werner, O. (ed.) Essays in Honor of C. F. Voegelin.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (ms.) Frame analysis.Google Scholar
Grimes, J. E. (1972). Outlines and overlays. Lg. 48. 513–24.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 137–53.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1968). The speech community. In Sills, D. L. (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: The Macmillan Company. Volume 9: 381–6.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds) (1964). The ethnography of communication. (AmA 66 (6) pt 2.) Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds) (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1944). Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Lg 20. 142–9.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1969). The prehistory of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1964). Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1970). Linguistic theory and the functions of speech. In International days of sociolinguistics. Rome: Instituto Luigi Sturzo. 111–44.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971 a). On communicative competence. In Huxley, R. and Ingram, E. (eds), Language acquisition: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 3–28.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971 b). Sociolinguistics and the ethnography of speaking. In Ardener, E. (ed.), Social anthropology and language. (ASA 10). London: Tavistock. 47–93.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972 a). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972 b). Review of Noam Chomsky by John, Lyons. Lg 48. 416–27.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (forthcoming). Syntactic arguments and role relationships. Are there some of the latter in any of the former? In Jazayery, M. A., Polomé, E. and Winter, W. (eds), Essays in Honor of A. A. Hill.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (ed.) (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. E. (eds) Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 143–73.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 23. 30–87.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Rules for ritual insult. In Sudnow, D. (ed.) Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press. 120–69.Google Scholar
Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In Helm, J. (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual Arts (Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society). Seattle: University of Washington Press. 12–44.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R.Language and woman's place. LinS 2 (1).Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Lg 48. 907–27.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1972). Signifying and marking: Two Afro-American speech acts. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 161–79.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. and Emonds, J. (1971). The linguist in American society. In Papers from the 7th regional meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. 285–303.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1970). On declarative sentences. In Jacobs, R. A. and Rosenbaum, P. S. (eds). Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn and Company. 222–72.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the Analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 325–45.Google Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1969). Super-hypersentences. Paper in Linguistics I (1). 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E. (1929). Male and female forms of speech in Yana. In St. Teeuwen, W. J. (ed.), Donum natalicium schrijnen. Nijmegen – Utrecht: Dekker and Van de Vegt. 79–85.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Sequencing in conversational openings. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds). 346–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenker, I. (1972). Former Chomsky disciples hurl harsh words at the master. New York Times, Sunday, 09 10, 1970.Google Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1973) Verbal and non-verbal deixis: the pointed lip gesture among the San Bias Cuna. LinS 2 (1). 117–31.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. (ms.) Sociolinguistics and medical history. Presented at 3rd International Conference of Applied Linguistics (Copenhagen).Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. (1971) The origin and diversification of language. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., and Herzog, H. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Y. (eds), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar