Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-5jtmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T15:02:14.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant’s Justification of Parental Duties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2016

Heiko Puls
Heiko Puls*
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
*
Email: heipuls@googlemail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his applied moral philosophy, Kant formulates the parents’ duty to make their child happy. I argue that, for Kant, this duty is an ad hoc attempt at compensating for the parental guilt of having brought a person into the condition of existence – and hence also having created her need for happiness – on their own initiative. I argue that Kant’s considerations regarding parental duties and human reproduction in general imply arguments for an ethically justified anti-natalism, but that this position is abolished in his teleology for meta-ethical reasons.

Keywords

parental dutiesprocreationhappinessphilosophy of lawKant’s pessimism

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 53 - 75
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altman, Matthew C. (2011) Kant and Applied Ethics: The Uses and Limits of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, David, and Benatar, David (2010) Procreation and Parenthood: The Ethics of Bearing and Rearing Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Michael W. (2007) Conceptions of Parenthood: Ethics and the Family. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Benatar, David (2006) Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blustein, Jeffrey (1997) ‘Procreation and Parental Responsibility’. Journal of Social Philosophy, 28, 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowski, Ludwig Ernst (1804) Darstellung des Lebens und Charakters Immanuel Kant’s. Königsberg: Friedrich Nicolovius.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David (2012) Creation Ethics. Reproduction, Genetics, and the Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992) Theoretical Philosophy, 1755–1770, trans. and ed. David Walford in collaboration with Ralf Meerbote. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Lectures on Ethics, trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgement, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2001) Religion and Rational Theology, ed. Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2005) Notes and Fragments, trans. Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education, ed. Robert B. Louden and Günter Zöller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2011) Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings, trans. Patrick Frierson and Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, P. L. Moreau de (1974) ‘Essai de philosophie morale’. In Œuvres (Hildesheim and New York: Georg Olms Verlag; reprint of the first edition, Berlin, 1749), vol. 1, pp. 171–251.Google Scholar
Overall, Christine (2012) Why Have Children: The Ethical Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philström, Sami (2011) Transcendental Guilt: Reflections on Ethical Finitude. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Prusak, Bernard G. (2013) Parental Obligations and Bioethics: The Duties of a Creator. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Christian (1971) Der Rechtsgedanke Kants nach den frühen Quellen. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Roberts, Melinda A., and Wassermann, David T. (eds) (2009) Harming Future Persons. Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Dordrecht and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1986) Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, In Sämtliche Werke, ed. Wolfgang von Lohneysen, vols. 1–2, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine (1999) ‘Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm’. Legal Theory, 5, 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar