Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T12:31:57.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herder’s Constitutive Recognitionalism: Against Condillac and Kant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2025

Helder De Schutter
Helder De Schutter*
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
*
Email: helder.deschutter@kuleuven.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herder is often recognised as the intellectual originator of a tradition that stresses that language assimilation is a wrong. In what follows, I argue that that the way in which he has influenced that tradition is often misunderstood. Herder’s originality does not lie in his development of ‘linguistic constitutivism’ – the view that language plays a constitutive role in human cognition. Herder surely endorsed linguistic constitutivism, but so did earlier theorists, like Condillac, as well as French revolutionary theorists such as l’Abbé Grégoire. The original move that Herder made, I argue, is to add a normative, recognitionalist argument to the constitutive argument, and to intertwine the two. It is his constitutive recognitionalism that makes him the trailblazer of a new tradition.

Keywords

HerderCondillacKantmulticulturalismNationalismrecognition

Information

Type
Article
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2025 , pp. 9 - 28
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarsleff, H. (1982) From Locke to Saussure. Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Barry, B. (2001) Culture and Equality. An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. (2013) Three Critics of the Enligthenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bojda, M. and Gutschmidt, H. (2022) ‘Einleitung’. In: Herder, J. G. (2022), Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ed. Bojda, M. and Gutschmidt, H.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, XI- LXXVII.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A. (1997) ‘Theories of Secession’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1), 31–61.10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00049.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canovan, M. (1996) Nationhood and Political Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cloeren, Hermann J. (1988) Language and thought. German approaches to analytic philosophy in the 18th and 19th centuries. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110865684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condillac, E. B. (2001) Essay on the Origin of Human Knowledge. Tr. and ed. by Aarsleff, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2016) ‘The Liberal Linguistic Turn: Kymlicka’s Freedom Account Revisited.’ Dve Domovini (44), 51–65.Google Scholar
De Schutter, H. (2023) ‘Two Grounds of Multiculturalism.’ Ethnicities, 23 (4), 547–561.10.1177/14687968221149590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. (2014) ‘Kant’s Philosophy of Language?’ In: Schalow, F. and Velkley, R. (eds.), The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought. Historical and Critical Essays. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 81–104.10.2307/j.ctv47wc8t.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, H. (2002 [1794]), ‘Rapport sur la nécessité et les moyens d’anéantir les patois et d’universaliser l’usage de la langue française’, in de Certeau, M., Julia, D. and Revel, J. (eds.), Une politique de la langue. La Révolution française et les patois: l’enquête de Grégoire (Paris: Gallimard), 331–351.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1998) The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Ed. and tr. Cronin, C. and De Greiff, P.. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (2019) Auch eine Geschichte der Philosphie. Band 1. Die okzidentale Konstellation von Glauben und Wissen. Pustet: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research (2021) Conflict Barometer 2020. HIIK: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (1877–1913) Sämtliche Werke, ed. Suphan, B.. Berlin: Weidmann Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (2002) Philosophical Writings, ed. & tr. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. (2022) Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ed. Bojda, M. and Gutschmidt, H.. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998), Critique of Pure Reason (ed. Guyer, P.. and Wood, A..), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, H. (2023) ‘Kant on language and the (Self-)development of reason. Kant Yearbook 16(1), 109–134.10.1515/kantyb-2023-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 2019 ‘The Coherence of Liberal Nationalism’. In: Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (eds.), Liberal Nationalism and Its Critics: Normative and Empirical Questions. (Oxford University Press), 23–37.10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mininger, J.D. (2005) ‘Nachschrift eines Freundes: Kant, Lithuania, and the Praxis of Enlightenment’. Studies in East European Thought 57, 1–32.10.1007/s11212-004-3983-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. W. (2007) Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2014) Equal Recognition. The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2007) Multiculturalism without Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schalow, F. and Velkley, R. (2014) ‘Introduction: Situating the Problem of Language in Kant’s Thought’, In The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought. Historical and Critical Essays. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 3–26.10.2307/j.ctv47wc8t.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell 2014 ‘Nachschrift eines Freundes: Kant on Language, Friendship, and the Concept of a People’. In: Schalow, F. and Velkley, R. (eds.), The Linguistic Dimension of Kant’s Thought. Historical and Critical Essays. (Evanston: Northwestern University Press), 174–201.Google Scholar
Tamir, Y. (1993) Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1992) ‘The Politics of Recognition’. In Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 25–73.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1993) Reconciling the Solitudes. Essays on Canadian Federalism and Nationalism. ed. Laforest, Guy, Montréal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1515/9780773564237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. (1995) Philosophical Arguments. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2016) The Language Animal. The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674970250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (2011) Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199208876.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar