Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-gwv8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-12T19:44:57.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dutifully Wishing: Kant’s Re-evaluation of a Strange Species of Desire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Alexander T. Englert
Alexander T. Englert*
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
*
Email: aengler1@jhu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For Kant, ‘wish’ is a technical term denoting a strange species of desire. It is an instance in which someone wills something that she simultaneously knows she cannot bring about. As a result, it is, in one sense, antithetical to morality, which deals with ‘ought implies can’. I will argue that Kant re-evaluated wishing as (to some extent) causally efficacious and, further, of moral relevance. This re-evaluation has not been discussed in the literature, yet has been lurking in plain sight in a subtle shift in two versions of a footnote from the Critique of the Power of Judgement.

Keywords

wishinghighest goodCritique of the Power of Judgementwillmoralityactionreligion

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 373 - 394
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allison, Henry (2012) ‘Teleology and History in Kant: The Critical Foundations of Kant’s Philosophy of History’. In Amélie Rorty and James Schmidt (eds) Kant’s ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
Biss, Mavis (2015) ‘Kantian Moral Striving’. Kantian Review, 20, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1975) Thinking and Doing. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2009) The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, Eckart (2012) The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy. A Systematic Reconstruction. Trans. Brady Bowman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (2008) ‘Der Mensch als Endzweck’. In Otfried Höffe (ed.) Klassiker Auslegen. Kritik der Urteilskraft (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), pp. 289–308.Google Scholar
Höwing, Thomas (2013) ‘Das Verhältnis der Vermögen des menschlichen Gemüts zu den Sittengesetz’. In Andreas Trampota, Oliver Sensen and Jens Timmermann (eds) Kant’s ‘Tugendlehre’: A Comprehensive Commentary (Boston: De Gruyter), pp. 25–58.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Paul Guyer. Trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1922) Briefwechsel. In Königlich Preußischen Akademie and der Wissenschaft (ed.), Kants Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 11.2. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. and ed. Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2005) Notes and Fragments. Ed. Paul Guyer. Trans. Curtis Bowman, Paul Guyer and Frederick Rauscher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Günter Zöller and Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012) Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. and trans. Allen W. Wood and Robert B. Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Richard (2009) Kant’s Theory of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrisson, Iain (2008) Kant and the Role of Pleasure in Moral Action. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Rehberg, August Wilhelm (1828) Sämmtliche Schriften, Erster Band. Hanover: Verlag der Hahn’schen Hofbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Sweet, Kristi (2013) Kant on Practical Life: From Duty to History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willaschek, Marcus, Stolzenberg, Jürgen, Mohr, Georg and Bacin, Stefano (eds) (2015) Kant-Lexicon, vol. 3. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa (2016) ‘Making the Ideal Real: Publicity and Morality in Kant’. Kantian Review, 21, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar