Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T15:36:15.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ālimḌākū and the Mystery of the Rubber Sea Monster: UrduDetective Fiction in 1930s Punjab and the Experienceof Colonial Modernity1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2002

Abstract

Detective fiction counts amongst the most successfulliterary products that the metropolitan west hasexported to the world periphery. Between the end ofthe nineteenth century and the outbreak of theSecond World War the genre acquired a globalpresence – both in the form of translations ofexisting works such as the Sherlock Holmes stories,and in the form of numerous indigenous adaptations.This kind of literature represented a prime exampleof the mass-produced and mass-circulated printentertainment that was part and parcel of theemergence of mass consumption as a social form.Detective fiction was, thus, both a carrier and anexpression of modernity. While some literarytheorists have pointed to longstanding historicalantecedents, detective fiction would not have madesense in earlier historical epochs. The principlesof scientific enquiry permeate the genre throughout,not just in terms of the ubiquitous magnifyingglasses, finger-prints and assorted scientificapparatuses, but in terms of the subject matteritself – the fact that it is possible to make senseof an increasingly confusing world by uncoveringhidden causal connections through rationalenquiry.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

1

An earlier draft of this paper was presented ata Workshop on ‘Grand Narratives of Transformationand the Historiography of South Asia’, 7 July2000, which was supported by the Royal AsiaticSociety. I am grateful for comments by FrancescaOrsini, Peter van der Veer, Avril Powell, FrancisRobinson, Rajarshi Dasgupta, Debraj Battacharyaand Kaushik Bhaumik.

References

1 An earlier draft of this paper was presented at a Workshop on ‘Grand Narratives of Transformation and the Historiography of South Asia’, 7 July 2000, which was supported by the Royal Asiatic Society. I am grateful for comments by Francesca Orsini, Peter van der Veer, Avril Powell, Francis Robinson, Rajarshi Dasgupta, Debraj Battacharya and Kaushik Bhaumik.