Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-29T23:14:07.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The response of decapod and mysid crustaceans to artificially lighted trawls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. M. Hargreaves  and
P. J. Herring
P. M. Hargreaves
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, Godalming, Surrey, GU8 5UB
P. J. Herring
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, Godalming, Surrey, GU8 5UB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A sampling series was undertaken with an opening/closing mid water trawl to assess the responses of midwater crustaceans to illumination and to compare these with previous reports resulting from the use of an open net. An electric light fitted on an RMT8 midwater trawl was switched on for alternate hauls of a series of 31 tows at a depth of 800 ± 25 m at 20°30'N 19°40'W. Turning the light on had no significant effect on the numbers or sizes of the numerically dominant species in the catches.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , August 1992 , pp. 621 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blaxter, J.H.S. & Currie, R.I., 1967. The effect of artificial lights on acoustic scattering layers in the ocean. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, no. 19,1–14.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S., Parrish, B.B. & Dickson, W., 1964. The importance of vision in the reaction of fish to driftnets and trawls. In Modern fishing gear of the world, vol. 2 (ed. H., Kristjonsson), pp. 529–536. London: Fishing News Books.Google Scholar
Boden, B.P. & Kampa, E.M., 1967. The influence of natural light on the vertical migrations of an animal community in the sea. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, no. 19,15–26.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R. & Pascoe, P.L., 1985. The influence of an electric light on the capture of deep-sea animals by a midwater trawl. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 65, 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M.R., Pascoe, P.L. & Maddock, L., 1986. Influence of 70 watt electric lights on the capture of fish by otter trawl off Plymouth. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 66,711–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutter, R.I. & Anraku, M., 1968. Avoidance of samplers. In Zooplankton sampling. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, no. 2 (ed. D.J., Tranter), pp. 57–76. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Crosnier, A. & Forest, J., 1973. Les crevettes profondes de l'Atlantique oriental tropical. Faune Tropicale, Paris, 19,1–409.Google Scholar
Domanski, P.A., 1986. The Azores front: a zoogeographic boundary? In Pelagic biogeography. Unesco Technical Papers in Marine Science, no. 49 (ed. A.C., Pierrot-Bultset al.), pp. 73–83. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Fleminger, A. & Clutter, R.I., 1965. Avoidance of towed nets by zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 10, 96–104.Google Scholar
Forward, R.B. Jr 1988. Diel vertical migration: zooplankton photobiology and behaviour. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, London, 26, 361–393.Google Scholar
Foxton, P., 1972. Observations on the vertical distribution of the genus Acanthephyra (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the eastern North Atlantic with particular reference to species of the ‘purpurea’ group. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. B, 73, 301–313.Google Scholar
Heath, M. & Dunn, J., 1990. Avoidance of a midwater frame trawl by herring larvae. Journal du Conseil, 47,140–147.Google Scholar
Herring, P.J.et al., 1987. RRS ‘Discovery’ Cruise 168, 23 June - 7 August 1987. Trophic and physiological studies over the north-west African slope and in the eastern North Atlantic. Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, Cruise Report, no. 200, 56 pp.Google Scholar
Hiller-Adams, P. & Case, J.F., 1988. Eye size of pelagic crustaceans as a function of habitat depth and possession of photophores. Vision Research, 28, 667–680.Google Scholar
Kampa, E.M., 1976. Photoenvironment and vertical migrations of mesopelagic marine animal communities. In Biological rhythms in the marine environment (ed. P.J., De Coursey), pp. 257–272. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Land, M.F., 1980. Optics and vision in invertebrates. In Handbook of sensory physiology, vol. 7, part 6B (ed. H., Autrum), pp. 472–592. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Land, M.F., 1984. Crustacea. In Photoreception and vision in invertebrates (ed. M.A., Ali), pp. 401–438. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, P. & Baussant, T., 1990. Effet de l'approche d'un submersible éclairé sur la couche diffusante profonde detéctée à 15 kHz en mer Ligure (Mediterranée). Compte Rendu de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 311,181–186.Google Scholar
Pascoe, P.L., 1990. Light and the capture of marine animals. In Light and life in the sea (ed. P.J., Herringet al.), pp. 229–244. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearcy, W.G., ed., 1983. SCOR symposium on methods of sampling micronekton. BiologicalOceanography, 1,105–456.Google Scholar
Roe, H.S.J., 1984. The diel migrations and distributions within a mesopelagic community in the north-east Atlantic. 2. Vertical migrations and feeding of mysids and decapod Crustacea. Progress in Oceanography, 13, 269–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H.S.J., Baker, A. De C, Carson, R.M., Wild, R. & Shale, D.M., 1980. Behaviour of the Institute of Oceanographic Sciences' rectangular midwater trawls: theoretical aspects and experimental observations. Marine Biology, 56, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, H.S.J. & Shale, D.M., 1979. A new multiple rectangular midwater trawl (RMT1+8M) and some modifications to the Institute of Oceanographic Sciences' RMT 1+8. Marine Biology, 50,283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, B.F., Joiner, B.L. & Ryan, A.T., 1985. Minitab handbook. 2nd ed. Boston: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
Sas, , 1989. SAS user's guide. North Carolina: SAS Institute Incorporated.Google Scholar
Steedman, H.F., 1976. General and applied data on formaldehyde fixation and preservation of marine zooplankton. In Zooplankton fixation and preservation (ed H.F., Steedman), pp. 103–154. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W.M. & Tattersall, O.S., 1951. The British Mysidacea. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Wiebe, P.H., Boyd, S.H., Davis, B.M. & Cox, J.L., 1982. Avoidance of towed nets by the euphausiid Nematoscelis megalops. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Washington, DC, 80, 75–91.Google Scholar