Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T05:17:51.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the pelagic occurrence and dispersal of the benthic amphipod Corophium volutator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Karel Essink ,
Hans L. Kleef  and
Wim Visser
Karel Essink
Affiliation:
Rijkswaterstaat, Tidal Waters Division, P.O. Box 207, 9750 AE Haren, The Netherlands
Hans L. Kleef
Affiliation:
Rijkswaterstaat, Tidal Waters Division, P.O. Box 207, 9750 AE Haren, The Netherlands
Wim Visser
Affiliation:
Rijkswaterstaat, Tidal Waters Division, P.O. Box 207, 9750 AE Haren, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Field data on the pelagic occurrence of Corophium volutator were obtained in 1981–82 in the Dollard (Ems estuary). The pelagic population density averaged over a tidal half cycle was in the range 0–15 m-3. The pelagic population represents about 0.06% of the benthic population. On most sampling days pelagic occurrence resulted in a net flood surplus transport.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 11 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

BOEDE, 1985. Biological research Ems-Dollard estuary. Rijkswaterstaat Communications, no. 40, 169 pp.Google Scholar
Dauer, D.M., Ewing, R.M., Sourbeer, J.W., Harlan, W.T. & Stokes, T.L. Jr, 1982. Nocturnal movements of the macrobenthos of the Lafayette River, Virginia. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 67, 761–775.Google Scholar
Holmström, W.F. & Morgan, E., 1978. Some properties of the tidal activity rhythm in the estuarine amphipod Corophium volutator. In Cyclic Phenomena in Marine Plants and Animals. Proceedings of the 13th European Marine Biology Symposium, Isle of Man, 1978 (ed. E., Naylor and R.G., Hartnoll), pp. 355–356. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Holmström, W.F. & Morgan, E., 1983. Variation in the naturally occuring rhythm of the estuarine amphipod, Corophium volutator (Pallas). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 833–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleef, H.L., 1984. A simple and time-saving method for quantitative collection of Corophium volutator (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from plankton samples rich in detritus. Hydrobiological Bulletin, 18, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLusky, D.S., 1968. Some effects of salinity on the distribution and abundance of Corophium volutator in the Ythan estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, E., 1965. The activity rhythm of the amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) and its possible relationship to changes in hydrostatic pressure associated with the tides. Journal of Animal Ecology, 34, 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R.C., 1979. Biology of Intertidal Animals, 3rd ed.Faversham, Kent: Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd.Google Scholar
Postma, H., 1954. Hydrography of the Dutch Wadden Sea. Archives Neerlandaises de Zoologie, 10, 405–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postma, H., 1961. Transport and accumulation of suspended matter in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 1, 148–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stam, A., 1981. The food of pelagic fishes of the Dollart. Kieler Meeresforschungen, Sonderheft 5, 282.Google Scholar
Veer, H.W. van der & Sadée, C.F.M., 1984. Seasonal occurrence of the ctenophore Pleurobrachia pileus in the western Dutch Wadden Sea. Marine Biology, 79, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A.B. & Bynum, K. H., 1972. A ten-year study of meroplankton in north Carolina estuaries: amphipods. Chesapeake Science, 13, 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar