Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-g7ldn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T13:28:34.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First evidence of the diatom Hemiaulus and cyanobacterium Richelia endosymbiosis in the Sea of Marmara

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2025

Neslihan Balkis-Ozdelice*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Seyfettin Tas
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Oceanography and Marine Biology, Institute of Marine Sciences and Management, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Turgay Durmus
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Fatma Bayram-Partal
Affiliation:
Marine Research and Technology Research Group, Climate and Life Science Vice Presidency, TUBITAK-Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli, Türkiye
Muharrem Balci
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: Neslihan Balkis-Ozdelice; Email: neslbalk@istanbul.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The endosymbiotic association between the diatom Hemiaulus and the cyanobacterium Richelia was first observed in the Sea of Marmara in July 2021. The spatial distribution of the host diatom Hemiaulus spp. and the endosymbiont cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis was investigated along with available physicochemical parameters. Three species of the Hemiaulus genus (H. hauckii, H. membranaceus, and H. sinensis) were morphologically identified in the study area. Hemiaulus hauckii and H. sinensis reached up to 128 × 103 cells L−1 and 38 × 103 cells L−1, respectively, while H. membranaceus was rarely observed. Each Hemiaulus cell contained one Richelia trichome, which had heterocysts at both ends. The surface water temperatures and salinity varied between 23.2°C and 28.5°C, 21.4 and 23.5, respectively. Dissolved oxygen levels ranged from 6.2 to 7.6 mg L−1, while chlorophyll-a concentrations were between 0.3 and 6.8 µg L−1. Nutrient concentrations varied between 0.05 and 0.18 μM for NO3 + NO2–N, 0.04–0.24 μM for NH4–N, 0.02–0.39 μM for PO4–P, and 0.18–1.42 μM for SiO2–Si. This study reveals that the HemiaulusRichelia symbiosis may promote the proliferation of diatom populations and may play an important role in nutrient dynamics in nitrogen-limiting environments and in the overall functioning of the marine ecosystem.

Information

Type
Marine Record
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

Introduction

Hemiaulus is a common diatom genus that includes marine plankton species (H. hauckii, H. indicus, H. membranaceus, H. sinensis) in warm water regions to temperate zones (Hasle and Syvertsen, Reference Hasle, Syvertsen and Tomas1997) and in warm oligotrophic seas (Guillard and Kilham, Reference Guillard, Kilham and Werner1977). Richelia intracellularis Schmidt is a nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium, cells are shorter than they are wide, 6–8 µm broad and heterocysts develop successively at both ends of trichomes (Guiry and Guiry, Reference Guiry and Guiry2020). Many studies over the last decades have demonstrated N-fixation and transfer in diatom–cyanobacterial symbiosis (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Kuypers, Vagner, Paerl, Musat and Zehr2011; Inomura et al., Reference Inomura, Follett, Masuda, Eichner, Prášil and Deutsch2020; Sundstrom, Reference Sundstrom1984; Venrick, Reference Venrick1974; Villareal, Reference Villareal1991; Zeev et al., Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008). Nitrogen-fixing organisms (diazotrophs) play a crucial role as an important nitrogen source to phytoplankton nutrient budgets in N-limited marine environments (Pyle et al., Reference Pyle, Johnson and Villareal2020). A symbiotic relationship is known between some diatoms and a filamentous cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis (Villareal, Reference Villareal1991; Zeev et al., Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008). Richelia intracellularis is usually found as an endosymbiont within diatoms such as Rhizosolenia spp. and Hemiaulus spp. (Koray, Reference Koray1988; Pyle et al., Reference Pyle, Johnson and Villareal2020; Sundstrom, Reference Sundstrom1984; Venrick, Reference Venrick1974; Zeev et al., Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008). The presence of a heterocyst indicates that N2-fixation is likely possible in this symbiosis (Kimor et al., Reference Kimor, Reid and Jordan1978). Diatom–diazotroph associations containing R. intracellularis were traditionally considered the dominant nitrogen-fixing plankton in marine tropical oceans (Zeev et al., Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008). Inomura et al. (Reference Inomura, Follett, Masuda, Eichner, Prášil and Deutsch2020) suggested that carbon transfer from the host diatom enables faster growth and N2 fixation rates by trichomes. Richelia intracellularis was also found as an epiphytic cyanobacterium on the diatom Chaetoceros compressus Lauder, 1864 (Gomez et al., Reference Gomez, Furuya and Takeda2005).

The Sea of Marmara (SoM) is a small, semi-enclosed basin with an area of 11,350 km2 and a maximum depth 1,273 m, connected to the Black Sea and the Aegean Sea through the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus) and Canakkale (Dardanelles). The SoM has two-layered water masses that the upper layer (0–25 m) is brackish (∼22 salinity) originating from the Black Sea, and the lower layer is saline (∼38 salinity) originating from the Mediterranean Sea. These two stratified water masses are distinctly separated by an interface layer (Besiktepe et al., Reference Besiktepe, Sur, Ozsoy, Latif, Oguz and Unluata1994; Unluata et al., Reference Unluata, Oguz, Latif, Ozsoy and Pratt1990). The hydrography of the upper layer is strongly associated with the Black Sea (Polat and Tuğrul, Reference Polat and Tuğrul1995). Nutrient concentrations in the upper euphotic zone are relatively low, with seasonal variations depending on the photosynthetic activity (Baştürk et al., Reference Baştürk, Tugrul, Yilmaz and Saydam1990). Primary production is always higher in the upper layer, while the lower layer has nutrient-rich waters due to the limitation of the euphotic zone by the intermediate layer (Polat et al., Reference Polat, Tuğrul, Coban, Basturk and Salihoglu1998). Also, nitrogen is the limiting nutrient (Balkis, Reference Balkis2003; Balkis and Toklu-Alicli, Reference Balkis and Toklu-Alicli2014; Tüfekçi et al., Reference Tüfekçi, Balkis, Beken, Ediger and Mantıkçı2010). Previous studies have indicated that Hemiaulus species were a significant component of the SoM. Hemiaulus hauckii was identified by Balkis (Reference Balkis2004) with densities ranging from 3900 cells L−1 in September 1998 to 80 cells L−1 in November 1998, and by Tas et al. (Reference Tas, Kus and Yilmaz2020) in the northeastern SoM in 2004 and 2006 (presence only). Balkis and Toklu-Alicli (Reference Balkis and Toklu-Alicli2014) reported this species in the Gulf of Bandırma in November 2007 (360 cells L−1) and August 2008 (960 cells L−1), while Balkis-Ozdelice et al. (Reference Balkis-Ozdelice, Durmus, Toklu-Alicli and Balci2020) found it in the Gulf of Erdek in February 2007 (280 cells L−1), November 2007 (120 cells L−1), and August 2008 (100 cells L−1). Kayadelen et al. (Reference Kayadelen, Balkis-Ozdelice and Durmus2022) reported H. hauckii in the coastal waters of Burgazada in November 2013, and Ergul et al. (Reference Ergul, Balkis-Ozdelice, Koral, Aksan, Durmus, Kaya, Kaya, Ekmekci and Canli2021) noted its presence in the Gulf of İzmit and the coastal waters of Fatih (Istanbul) in September 2020 (1400 cells L−1). Additionally, Demir and Turkoglu (Reference Demir and Turkoglu2022) recorded an abundance of H. hauckii in the Çanakkale Strait (Dardanelles) at 5.4 × 10⁵ cells L−1 in October 2018, constituting 42.86% of the total phytoplankton abundance. Hemiaulus membranaceus was reported by Ergul et al. (Reference Ergul, Balkis-Ozdelice, Koral, Aksan, Durmus, Kaya, Kaya, Ekmekci and Canli2021) in the Gulf of İzmit (100 cells L−1), Biga (120 cells L−1), and Fatih (180 cells L−1) coastal waters in September 2020, and by Tas et al. (Reference Tas, Kus and Yilmaz2020) in the northeastern SoM. Hemiaulus sinensis was recorded by Ergul et al. (Reference Ergul, Balkis-Ozdelice, Koral, Aksan, Durmus, Kaya, Kaya, Ekmekci and Canli2021) in the Gulf of İzmit (240 cells L−1), Biga (160 cells L−1), and Fatih (2100 cells L−1) coastal waters in September 2020. However, none of these studies mentioned the HemiaulusRichelia symbiosis, nor was Richelia reported.

The present study aimed to reveal the first evidence of the endosymbiotic association between the diatom genus Hemiaulus and the diazotrophic cyanobacterium Richelia associated with the environmental drivers in the SoM.

Materials and methods

The physicochemical data in the SoM in summer 2021 (July/August) were collected via the TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Vessel as part of “the Integrated Marine Pollution Monitoring 2020–2022 Programme” which was implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Urbanization-CEDIDGM/Laboratory, Measurement and Monitoring Department under the coordination of TÜBİTAK-MAM CTUE. A SeaBird SBE 25Plus/ SBE 27 CTD device was used for temperature and salinity measurements. Inorganic nutrients (NOx–N, NH4–N, PO4–P, and SiO2) were analysed using an Autoanalyser (QuAAtro) available on-board. Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration was measured using an automatic titrator with the method of the Iodometric Winkler Test. Chlorophyll-a concentration was measured according to the acetone extraction method using a spectrophotometer (Parsons et al., Reference Parsons, Maita and Lalli1984), employing a filter with a mesh size of 0.45 µm and a path length of 5 cm, with 1 L of seawater used for filtration.

The seawater samples for phytoplankton analysis were collected from the surface of 15 sampling stations (Figure 1) using Niskin bottles and transferred into 1-L polyethylene dark containers and immediately fixed with acidic Lugol’s iodine solution (Throndsen, Reference Throndsen and Sournia1978). In the laboratory, samples were left to settle for at least a week, and then the samples were concentrated to 10 mL (Sukhanova, Reference Sukhanova and Sournia1978). The phytoplankton cells were counted on a Sedgewick–Rafter counting cell with 1 mL volume under an “Olympus CK2” model phase-contrast inverted microscope (Semina, Reference Semina and Sournia1978).

Figure 1. Study area and locations of sampling stations.

Prior to epifluorescence microscopy, glutaraldehyde was added to the samples at a final concentration of 2% to preserve cellular structures. The preserved samples were then examined using an Olympus BX51 epifluorescence microscope equipped with a U-MWB2 filter set (blue excitation: excitation filter 460–490 nm, dichroic mirror 500 nm, and emission filter 520 nm). Observations were conducted at magnifications of 200×, 400×, and 1000×, with immersion oil used where applicable. Cells of Hemiaulus spp. and their diazotrophic endosymbiont R. intracellularis were identified based on their natural autofluorescence. Structural features such as trichomes were distinguished by their linear morphology and characteristic fluorescence signal under blue excitation. No fluorescent dyes or staining procedures were applied during sample preparation or microscopy. For the identification of Hemiaulus species, Lebour (Reference Lebour1930), Cupp (Reference Cupp1943), Hendey (Reference Hendey1964), and Hasle and Syvertsen (Reference Hasle, Syvertsen and Tomas1997) were used, and R. intracellularis was identified according to Foster et al. (Reference Foster, Kuypers, Vagner, Paerl, Musat and Zehr2011), Sournia (Reference Sournia1986), and Zeev et al. (Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008).

Results

Physicochemical parameters

The values of some physicochemical parameters were measured simultaneously with the water samples taken. The water temperature ranged from a minimum of 23.2°C at station 45C to a maximum of 28.48°C at station MD67, with an average of 26.29°C. Salinity values varied from a minimum of 21.35 at station SD3 to a maximum of 32.52 at station GK1, averaging 22.56. The DO levels were recorded with a minimum of 6.22 mg L−1 at station D7MA, a maximum of 7.63 mg L−1 at station SD3, and an average of 7.15 mg L−1. Chlorophyll-a concentrations ranged from a minimum of 0.28 µg L−1 at station D7MA to a maximum of 6.77 µg L−1 at station MD89A, with an average of 1.24 µg L−1.

The concentrations of NO₃ + NO₂–N ranged from 0.05 µM, observed at all stations except MD89A, to 0.18 µM at MD89A. NH₄–N levels varied between 0.04 µM, detected at most stations, and 0.24 µM, which was measured at MD89A. PO₄–P concentrations ranged from 0.02 µM, measured at several stations, to a maximum of 0.39 µM at MD67. SiO₂–Si values spanned from 0.18 µM at MD101 to 1.42 µM at station 45C. The N:P molar ratio ranged between 0.23 at MD67 and 6.29 at MD89A.

An overview to phytoplankton composition

Within the phytoplankton composition observed during the summer period, when Hemiaulus species were present, a total of 95 taxa including nano- and microphytoplankton size group were identified (Supplementary Table S1). Thirty-nine taxa of these (41.1%) were diatoms, 39 taxa (41.1%) were dinoflagellates, and 17 taxa (17.8%) belonged to other groups. Also, R. intracellularis from Cyanophyceae, Dactyliosolen fragilissimus and H. hauckii from Bacillariophyceae, and Gonyaulax fragilis, Prorocentrum compressum, Prorocentrum micans, and Tripos furca from Dinophyceae were the most frequently encountered species in this period.

Identification and characterisation of the diatom genus Hemiaulus and endosymbiotic cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis

Three species of the diatom genus HemiaulusH. hauckii, H. membranaceus, and H. sinensis – were morphologically identified during the light microscopy examination. The genus Hemiaulus dominated the phytoplankton community in some sampling stations during this study period.

The presence of the cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis was first detected inside the diatom Hemiaulus cells as an endosymbiont using an epifluorescent microscope (Figure 2). This symbiotic association was observed at the stations D7, D7MA, ER1, MD19A, MD67, MD75, MD87, MD89A, and SD3, whereas it was sporadically found at the other stations. Some of the Hemiaulus cells contained one trichome of R. intracellularis. The trichome of R. intracellularis consisted of two to three vegetative cells and two heterocysts at both ends of each trichome observed in each Hemiaulus species (Figure 2).

Figure 2. The diatom genus Hemiaulus and cyanobacterium R. intracellularis symbiosis. (A, B) Epifluorescence microscopy at the two different dimensions of the same cell. (C−G): bright-field microscopy: (C, D) Hemiaulus hauckii; (E, F) Hemiaulus membranaceus; (G) Hemiaulus sinensis. The red arrows indicate the trichomes, while the white arrows point to the terminal heterocysts of R. intracellularis.

Hemiaulus hauckii had a large diameter (apical axis) averaged 40–60 µm and a small diameter (transapical axis) averaged 12–22 µm, and their chains could be as long as 180 µm. Hemiaulus hauckii was found either as a solitary cell or characterised by chains composed of 2–3 cells. The H-shaped cells had broad girdle view, straight margins, horns long, apertures large and rectangular (Figure 2C, D).

Hemiaulus membranaceus had a large diameter (apical axis) averaging 50–95 µm and a small diameter (transapical axis) averaging 25–35 µm, and it was rarely found as a solitary cell. Its chains were twisted, with short horns and elliptical valves. The Richelia intracellularis trichome was found inside the H. membranaceus cells (Figure 2E, F).

Hemiaulus sinensis had a large diameter (apical axis) averaging 12–14 µm and a small diameter (transapical axis) averaging 10–12 µm. Its chains were straight and composed of two to three cells, with horns having flattened tips and rectangular valves. The cells were significantly smaller than the other two species. The trichome of R. intracellularis inside the H. sinensis cells consisted of two to three vegetative cells and two heterocysts at both ends of each trichome (Figure 2G).

Hemiaulus species were clearly distinguished morphologically from each other under a bright-field light microscope (Figure 2C–G). The symbiotic association between Hemiaulus and Richelia was observed more distinctly under an epifluorescent microscope (Figure 2A, B). However, this symbiosis was also occasionally noticed under a bright-field light microscope (Figure 2D–G). The average diameter of R. intracellularis inside Hemiaulus species was approximately 17–18 µm. Two circular heterocysts appeared clearly at both terminal of the vegetative cell (Figure 2A, B).

Abundance of the diatom Hemiaulus and cyanobacterium Richelia

The diatom Hemiaulus species were commonly observed in the study area except for some sampling stations as seen in Figure 3A. Hemiaulus hauckii was more abundant than H. sinensis and H. membranaceus. The highest abundance reached up to 166 × 103 cells L−1 at the station MD75, comprising H. hauckii (128 × 103 cells L−1, 77%) and H. sinensis (38 × 103 cells L−1, 23%). The other sampling stations with a high abundance of Hemiaulus species were the station D7 (90 × 103 cells L−1) and the station MD67 (71 × 103 cells L−1). Hemiaulus membranaceus was found in only one station (MD19A) at the low cell density (1 × 103 cells L−1) (Figure 3A). The diatom Hemiaulus and endosymbiotic cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis associations were mostly observed in the stations MD75 and D7. The endosymbiont R. intracellularis was often detected in the H. hauckii host. No Richelia trichomes or Hemiaulus species were detected at station MD104 (Figure 3A).

Figure 3. (A) Abundance of Hemiaulus species in the study area during summer 2021, (B) The relative abundance of the diatom Hemiaulus spp. in the total phytoplankton.

The stations with more than 50% of the relative proportion of Hemiaulus species in total phytoplankton were D7MA (96.9%), D7 (95.4%), MD87 (92.2%), MD67 (88%), ER1 (82.6%), GK1 (65.8%), MD101 (55.8%), and MD75 (54.1%) (Figure 3B).

Discussion

Nitrogen has previously been reported to be limited in the SoM (Balkis et al., Reference Balkis, Atabay, Turetgen, Albayrak, Balkıs and Tüfekçi2011, Reference Balkis, Sivri, Linda-Fraim, Balci, Durmus and Sukatar2013; Toklu-Alicli et al., Reference Toklu-Alicli, Polat and Balkis-Ozdelice2020; Tüfekçi et al., Reference Tüfekçi, Balkis, Beken, Ediger and Mantıkçı2010). The diatom–diazotrophy associations between H. hauckii and R. intracellularis have also been reported in other seas around the world (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Subramaniam, Mahaffey, Carpenter, Capone and Zehr2007; Zeev et al., Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008). It was detected that there were two terminal heterocysts at each trichome of the R. intracellularis.

The symbiotic associations between the diatom genus Hemiaulus and the cyanobacterium Richelia (diazotrophy), which are nitrogen-fixing organisms via their heterocysts, have a crucial role in N-limited environments. Considering the N-limitation in the SoM, this symbiotic association might have special significance for the functioning of the ecosystem. It is known that after seasonal stratification, Hemiaulus can become dominant in the Aegean Sea (Ignatiades, Reference Ignatiades1969).

Villareal (Reference Villareal1991) suggested that Hemiaulus obtains fixed-N from the symbionts that serves to sustain the host diatom in oligotrophic environments. This means that new nitrogen inputs via symbiotic N-fixation may increase the host Hemiaulus cell abundance in the N-limited environments, as reported by Pyle et al. (Reference Pyle, Johnson and Villareal2020). The role of Richelia as a diazotroph (nitrogen-fixing organism) is particularly crucial in such nitrogen-limited settings. Gomes et al. (Reference Gomes, Mendes, Cartaxana and Brotas2018) and Cieza et al. (Reference Cieza, Stanley, Marrec, Fontaine, Crockford, McGillicuddy, Mehta, Menden-Deuer, Peacock, Rynearson, Sandwith, Zhang and Sosik2024) have demonstrated that N-fixing organisms proliferate more under increased temperatures, significantly impacting nutrient dynamics. Additionally, Mikaelyan et al. (Reference Mikaelyan, Mosharov, Kubryakov, Pautova, Fedorov and Chasovnikov2020) found that decreased silicate levels could limit the photosynthetic capacity of phytoplankton, thereby hindering the growth of Hemiaulus species. Zeev et al. (Reference Zeev, Yogev, Man-Aharonovich, Kress, Herut, Béjà and Berman-Frank2008) highlighted that nitrogen-fixing symbiotic relationships become more pronounced under silicate deficiency. These observations indicate that increases in temperature and decreases in silicate levels contribute to the proliferation of the HemiaulusRichelia symbiosis.

This study revealed the HemiaulusRichelia symbiosis and significant seasonal and abundance changes in the abundance of Hemiaulus in the SoM. The highest abundances of H. hauckii and H. sinensis were observed in summer (July–August 2021), reaching 128 × 103 cells L−1 and 38 × 103 cells L−1, respectively, while H. membranaceus was rarely observed. This notable increase in distribution and abundance during the summer, coupled with the symbiotic relationship with Richelia demonstrated in our study, highlights a significant shift in the ecosystem dynamics of the SoM. Additionally, Demir and Turkoglu (Reference Demir and Turkoglu2022) reported high abundances of H. hauckii in the Çanakkale Strait; however, their study did not provide any data on symbiosis. Additionally, R. intracellularis has previously been reported as an endosymbiont within Rhizosolenia styliformis in the Aegean Sea (Koray, Reference Koray1988). In that study, Koray (Reference Koray1988) identified 15 distinct symbiotic pairings, including the association between Rhizosolenia styliformis + R. intracellularis, which was recorded at a density of 1500 cells L−1 in October. Koray (Reference Koray1988) also reported that these taxa were sensitive to changes in salinity, temperature, and oxygen levels, supporting their potential use as indicators of environmental stress, as previously suggested by Kimor (Reference Kimor1985). This study demonstrates for the first time that R. intracellularis forms a symbiotic relationship with Hemiaulus species in the SoM and Turkish coastal waters.

In conclusion, the identification of the HemiaulusRichelia symbiosis in the SoM, which is the first reported occurrence of the symbiosis between the diatom Hemiaulus and cyanobacterium Richelia in Turkish seas, adds a significant piece to the marine nutrient dynamics, particularly in nitrogen-limited environments. This symbiotic relationship not only enhances nitrogen availability for Hemiaulus but also supports the broader marine ecosystem by contributing to primary production and nutrient cycling. Further research should aim to elucidate the mechanisms behind these associations and their responses to environmental changes, providing valuable insights into marine ecology and the management of coastal ecosystems.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315425100295.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the TÜBİTAK 1001–121G116 project and the “Integrated Marine Pollution Monitoring 2020–2022 Programme” carried out by Ministry of Environment and Urbanisation/General Directorate of EIA, Permit and Inspection/Department of Laboratory, Measurement, and coordinated by TÜBİTAK-MRC ECPI.

Author contributions

Balkis-Ozdelice, N.: Conceptualisation, methodology, identification of species, data curation, writing-original draft. Tas, S.: Conceptualisation, methodology, identification of species, and writing-original draft. Durmus, T.: Conceptualisation, data curation, writing-original draft. Bayram-Partal, F.: Data curation, sampling, and writing-original draft. Balci, M.: Identification of species, data curation, and writing-original draft. Additionally, all the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) under grant number 121G116.

Competing interests

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

References

Balkis, N (2003) Seasonal variations in the phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics in the neritic water of Büyükçekmece Bay, Sea of Marmara. Journal of Plankton Research 25, 703717.10.1093/plankt/25.7.703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkis, N (2004) Tintinnids (Protozoa: Ciliophora) of the Buyukcekmece Bay in the Sea of Marmara. Scientia Marina 68, 3344.10.3989/scimar.2004.68n133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkis, N, Atabay, H, Turetgen, I, Albayrak, S, Balkıs, H and Tüfekçi, V (2011) Role of single-celled organisms in mucilage formation on the shores of Buyukada Island (the Sea of Marmara). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 771781.10.1017/S0025315410000081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balkis, N, Sivri, N, Linda-Fraim, N, Balci, M, Durmus, T and Sukatar, A (2013) Excessive growth of Cladophora laetevirens (Dillwyn) Kutzing and enteric bacteria in mats in the Southwestern Istanbul coast, Sea of Marmara. IUFS Journal of Biology 72, 4148.Google Scholar
Balkis, N and Toklu-Alicli, B (2014) Changes in phytoplankton community structure in the Gulf of Bandırma, Marmara Sea in 2006–2008. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 23, 29762983.Google Scholar
Balkis-Ozdelice, N, Durmus, T, Toklu-Alicli, B and Balci, M (2020) Phytoplankton composition related to the environmental conditions in the coastal waters of the Gulf of Erdek. Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences 49, 15451559.Google Scholar
Baştürk, O, Tugrul, S, Yilmaz, A, and Saydam, C (1990) Health of the Turkish Straits, chemical and environmental aspects of the Sea of Marmara. METU-Institute of Marine Sciences, Technical Report 90, 69.Google Scholar
Besiktepe, ST, Sur, , Ozsoy, E, Latif, MA, Oguz, T and Unluata, U (1994) The circulation of hydrography of the Marmara Sea. Progress in Oceanography 34, 285334.10.1016/0079-6611(94)90018-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieza, SAC, Stanley, RHR, Marrec, P, Fontaine, DN, Crockford, ET, McGillicuddy, DJ, Mehta, A, Menden-Deuer, S, Peacock, EE, Rynearson, TA, Sandwith, ZO, Zhang, W and Sosik, HM (2024) Unusual Hemiaulus bloom influences ocean productivity in Northeastern US Shelf waters. Biogeosciences 21, 12351257.10.5194/bg-21-1235-2024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cupp, EE (1943) Marine Plankton Diatoms of the West Coast of North America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Demir, and Turkoglu, M (2022) Temporal variations of phytoplankton community and their correlation with environmental factors in the coastal waters of the Çanakkale Strait in 2018. Oceanologia 64, 176197.10.1016/j.oceano.2021.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergul, HA, Balkis-Ozdelice, N, Koral, M, Aksan, S, Durmus, T, Kaya, M, Kaya, LM, Ekmekci, F and Canli, O (2021) The early stage of mucilage formation in the Marmara Sea during spring 2021. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment 27, 232257.Google Scholar
Foster, RA, Kuypers, MMM, Vagner, T, Paerl, RW, Musat, N and Zehr, JP (2011) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in open ocean diatom–cyanobacterial symbioses. The International Society for Microbial Ecology (ISME) Journal 5, 14841493.Google ScholarPubMed
Foster, RA, Subramaniam, A, Mahaffey, C, Carpenter, EJ, Capone, DG and Zehr, JP (2007) Influence of the Amazon River plume on distributions of free-living and symbiotic cyanobacteria in the Western tropical North Atlantic Ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 52, 517532.10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, A, Mendes, CRB, Cartaxana, P and Brotas, V (2018) Dynamics of diatom and dinoflagellate abundance in a coastal upwelling system. Journal of Phycology 54, 386399.Google Scholar
Gomez, F, Furuya, K and Takeda, S (2005) Distribution of the cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis as an epiphyte of the diatom Chaetoceros compressus in the western Pacific Ocean. Journal of Plankton Research 27, 323330.10.1093/plankt/fbi007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillard, RRL and Kilham, P (1977) The ecology of marine planktonic diatoms. In Werner, D. (ed), The Biology of Diatoms. Berkeley: University of California Press, 372469.Google Scholar
Guiry, MD and Guiry, GM (2020) AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org (accessed 28 February 2024).Google Scholar
Hasle, GR and Syvertsen, EE (1997) Marine Diatoms. In Tomas, CR. (ed), Identifying Marine Phytoplankton. New York: Academic Press, 5386.10.1016/B978-012693018-4/50004-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, NI (1964) An Introductory Account of the Smaller Algae of the British Coastal Waters, Part V: bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Fishery Investigations. Ser. 4. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ignatiades, L (1969) Annual cycle, species diversity and succession of phytoplankton in lower Saronicos Bay, Aegean Sea. Marine Biology 3, 196200.10.1007/BF00360951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inomura, K, Follett, CL, Masuda, T, Eichner, M, Prášil, O and Deutsch, C (2020) Carbon transfer from the host diatom enables fast growth and high rate of N2 fixation by symbiotic heterocystous Cyanobacteria. Plants 9, 192.10.3390/plants9020192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayadelen, Y, Balkis-Ozdelice, N and Durmus, T (2022) Determination of seasonal changes in phytoplankton community of the coastal waters of Burgaz Island (the Sea of Marmara). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 102, 214226.10.1017/S0025315422000406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimor, B (1985) Indicator species in marine phytoplankton. 29th CIESM Congress, Lucerne, October 11-19 .Google Scholar
Kimor, B, Reid, FMH and Jordan, JB (1978) An unusual occurrence of Hemiaulus membranaceus Cleve (Bacillariophyceae) with Richelia intracellularis Schmidt (Cyanophyceae) off the coast of Southern California in. October. 1976. Phycologia 17, 162166.10.2216/i0031-8884-17-2-162.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koray, T (1988) Symbiotic associations in microplankton of Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea) and their pollution dependent distributions (in Turkish). Doğa 12, 4652.Google Scholar
Lebour, MV (1930) The Planktonic Diatoms of Northern Seas. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Mikaelyan, AS, Mosharov, SA, Kubryakov, AA, Pautova, LA, Fedorov, A and Chasovnikov, VK (2020) The impact of physical processes on taxonomic composition, distribution and growth of phytoplankton in the open Black Sea. Journal of Marine Systems 208, 103365.10.1016/j.jmarsys.2020.103368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, TR, Maita, Y and Lalli, CM (1984) A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Polat, ÇS and Tuğrul, S (1995) Nutrient and organic carbon exchanges between the Black and Marmara Seas through the Bosphorus Strait. Continental Shelf Research 15, 11151132.10.1016/0278-4343(94)00064-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polat, ÇS, Tuğrul, S, Coban, Y, Basturk, O and Salihoglu, I (1998) Elemental composition of seston and nutrient dynamics in the Sea of Marmara. Hydrobiologia 363, 157167.10.1023/A:1003117504005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyle, AE, Johnson, AM and Villareal, TA (2020) Isolation, growth, and nitrogen fixation rates of the Hemiaulus-Richelia (diatom-cyanobacterium) symbiosis in culture. PeerJ 8, e10115.10.7717/peerj.10115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semina, HJ (1978) Treatment of an aliquot sample. In Sournia, A. (ed), Phytoplankton Manual. Paris: UNESCO, 181.Google Scholar
Sournia, A (1986) Atlas du Phytoplankton Marine. Volume I: introduction, Cyanophycées, Dictyochophycées, Dinophycées Et Raphidophycées. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Sukhanova, IN (1978) Settling without the inverted microscope. In Sournia, A. (ed), Phytoplankton Manual. Paris: UNESCO, 97.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, BG (1984) Observations on Rhizosolenia clevei Ostenfeld (Bacillariophyceae) and Richelia intracellularis Schmidt (Cyanophyceae). Botanica Marina 27, 345355.10.1515/botm.1984.27.8.345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, S, Kus, D and Yilmaz, IN (2020) Temporal variations in phytoplankton composition in the north-eastern Sea of Marmara: Potentially toxic species and mucilage event. Mediterranean Marine Science 21, 668683.Google Scholar
Throndsen, J (1978) Preservation and storage. In Sournia, A. (ed), Phytoplankton Manual. Paris: UNESCO, 6974.Google Scholar
Toklu-Alicli, B, Polat, S and Balkis-Ozdelice, N (2020) Temporal variations in the abundance of picoplanktonic Synechococcus (Cyanobacteria) during a mucilage event in the Gulfs of Bandırma and Erdek. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 233, 112.10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tüfekçi, V, Balkis, N, Beken, CP, Ediger, D and Mantıkçı, M (2010) Phytoplankton composition and environmental conditions of a mucilage event in the Sea of Marmara. Turkish Journal of Biology 34, 199210.Google Scholar
Unluata, U, Oguz, T, Latif, MA and Ozsoy, E (1990) On the physical oceanography of the Turkish Straits. In Pratt, LJ. (ed), The Physical Oceanography of Sea Straits. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2560.10.1007/978-94-009-0677-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venrick, EL (1974) The distribution and significance of Richelia-intracellularis Schmidt in North Pacific central gyre. Limnology and Oceanography 19, 437445.10.4319/lo.1974.19.3.0437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villareal, TA (1991) Nitrogen-fixation by the cyanobacterial symbiont of the diatom genus Hemiaulus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 76, 201204.10.3354/meps076201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeev, EB, Yogev, T, Man-Aharonovich, D, Kress, N, Herut, B, Béjà, O and Berman-Frank, I (2008) Seasonal dynamics of the endosymbiotic, nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. The International Society for Microbial Ecology (ISME) Journal 2, 911923.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Study area and locations of sampling stations.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The diatom genus Hemiaulus and cyanobacterium R. intracellularis symbiosis. (A, B) Epifluorescence microscopy at the two different dimensions of the same cell. (C−G): bright-field microscopy: (C, D) Hemiaulus hauckii; (E, F) Hemiaulus membranaceus; (G) Hemiaulus sinensis. The red arrows indicate the trichomes, while the white arrows point to the terminal heterocysts of R. intracellularis.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (A) Abundance of Hemiaulus species in the study area during summer 2021, (B) The relative abundance of the diatom Hemiaulus spp. in the total phytoplankton.

Supplementary material: File

Balkis-Ozdelice et al. supplementary material

Balkis-Ozdelice et al. supplementary material
Download Balkis-Ozdelice et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.9 KB