Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T22:50:58.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing computerized transcription exercises for American English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Caroline Henton  and
Anthony Bladon
Caroline Henton
Affiliation:
Linguistics Program, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
Anthony Bladon
Affiliation:
Phonetics Laboratory, University of Oxford, 37/41 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JF, U.K.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Acquiring the skill of phonetic transcription from orthographic text is a widespread technique included in all undergraduate curricula for phonetics, linguistics and speech science. It is an ability which is also frequently expected in students of modern languages and English. Any instructor who has been faced with a pile of thirty and more transcriptions to mark knows what a laborious task this is, requiring a lot of close examination of fine detail. To be able to lighten the load by computerizing some of the detail of error-correcting is therefore seen as desirable from several points of view.

Information

Type
Phonetics Software for Personal Computers
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , December 1987 , pp. 72 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bladon, A. (1987). Automating the practice of phonetic transcription. In Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (editor), Studies in Honour of René Derolez. Gent: Rijksuniversiteit Gent, 30–43.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jones, D. and Gimson, A. C. (1977). English Pronouncing Dictionary (14th edition, revised and edited by Gimson, A. C.). London: Dent.Google Scholar
Kenyon, J. S. and Knott, T. A. (1953). A Pronouncing Dictionary of American English. Springfield, Mass: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1982). A Course in Phonetics (2nd edition). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1987). Proposed revision of the International Phonetic Alphabet: A conference. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17:1, 34.Google Scholar
Lennig, M. and Brassard, J.P. (1984). Machine-readable phonetic alphabet for English and French. Speech Communication 3, 165–166.Google Scholar
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS (1985). The Oxford Dictionary of Current English (Allen, R. E., editor).Google Scholar
PENGUIN BOOKS (1985). The Penguin English Dictionary 1985–1986.Google Scholar
Prator, C. H. (1951). Manual of American English Pronunciation for Adult Foreign Students. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L. and Smith, H.L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 3 (3rd edition 1957). Washington, D.C.: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1986). A standardized machine-readable phonetic notation. In Conference Publication No. 258. International Conference on Speech Input/Output; Techniques and Applications, 24–26 March 1986. London: Institute of Electrical Engineers, 134–137.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1987). Computer coding of phonetic symbols. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17:2, 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, C. M. (1957). Applied Phonetics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zue, V. W. and Laferriere, M. (1979). Acoustic study of medial /t, d/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66:4, 1039–1050.Google Scholar