Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 14
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
JACOBSON, MARK W. DELIS, DEAN C. HAMILTON, JOANNE M. BONDI, MARK W. and SALMON, DAVID P. 2004. How do neuropsychologists define cognitive constructs? Further thoughts on limitations of factor analysis used with normal or mixed clinical populations. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 10, Issue. 7, p. 1020.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Greenaway, Melanie C. Smith, Glenn E. Tangalos, Eric G. Geda, Yonas E. and Ivnik, Robert J. 2009. Mayo Older Americans Normative Studies: Factor Analysis of an Expanded Neuropsychological Battery. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 7.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Hoelzle, James B. Nelson, Nathaniel W. and Smith, Clifford A. 2011. Comparison of Wechsler Memory Scale–Fourth Edition (WMS–IV) and Third Edition (WMS–III) dimensional structures: Improved ability to evaluate auditory and visual constructs. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 283.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo Paino, Mercedes Lemos-Giráldez, Serafín Sierra-Baigrie, Susana González, Mª Paz García-Portilla Bobes, Julio and Muňiz, José 2011. Borderline Personality Traits in Nonclinical Young Adults. Journal of Personality Disorders, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 542.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Crisp, Victoria and Shaw, Stuart 2012. Applying methods to evaluate construct validity in the context of A level assessment. Educational Studies, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 209.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Mungas, Dan Heaton, Robert Tulsky, David Zelazo, Philip David Slotkin, Jerry Blitz, David Lai, Jin-Shei and Gershon, Richard 2014. Factor Structure, Convergent Validity, and Discriminant Validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in Adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 20, Issue. 6, p. 579.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bezdicek, Ondrej Libon, David J. Stepankova, Hana Panenkova, Erika Lukavsky, Jiri Garrett, Kelly Davis Lamar, Melissa Price, Catherine C. and Kopecek, Miloslav 2014. Development, Validity, and Normative Data Study for the 12-Word Philadelphia Verbal Learning Test [czP(r)VLT-12] Among Older and Very Old Czech Adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 28, Issue. 7, p. 1162.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Yıldırım, Necmiye Ün Büyüköztürk, Şener Bayramlar, Kezban Özengin, Nuriye Külünkoğlu, Bahar Anaforoğlu and Çoban, Özge 2019. Developing a shoulder pain scale for wheelchair basketball players. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 479.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
ÖZDEMİR, Hasan Fehmi TORAMAN, Çetin and KUTLU, Ömer 2019. The use of polychoric and Pearson correlation matrices in the determination of construct validity of Likert type scales. Turkish Journal of Education, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 180.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Katrancı, Yasemin and Şengül, Sare 2019. The relationship between mathematical literacy and visual math literacy self-efficacy perceptions of middle school students. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, Vol. 9, Issue. 4, p. 1113.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Furey, Rachel T. Bowden, Stephen C. Simpson, Leonie C. Meade, Catherine E. Davis, Brooke M. and D’Souza, Wendyl J. 2022. Exploring the Semantic Structure of WMS-IV Verbal Paired Associates using the Hub-and-Spoke Model. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, Vol. 28, Issue. 5, p. 494.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
KEDİKLİ, Diler and KATRANCI, Yasemin 2022. Inquiry Learning Skills in Geometry : a scale development. Acta Didactica Napocensia, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 61.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Becker, David Meisenberg, Gerhard Dutton, Edward Bakhiet, Salaheldin Farah Humad, Osman Ahmed Mohamed Abdoulaye, Hamissou Arouna and Ahmed, Salaheldin Abdelrahman Elrasheed Seed 2022. Factor structure in Raven’s Progressive Matrices Plus in sub-Saharan Africa – Benin and Djibouti. Journal of Psychology in Africa, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 103.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Wilson, Christopher J. Bowden, Stephen C. Byrne, Linda K. Joshua, Nicole R. Marx, Wolfgang and Weiss, Lawrence G. 2023. The cross-cultural generalizability of cognitive ability measures: A systematic literature review.. Intelligence, Vol. 98, Issue. , p. 101751.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge-org.demo.remotlog.com is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The role of factor analysis in construct validity: Is it a myth?
  • Volume 10, Issue 7
  • STEPHEN C. BOWDEN (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704107091
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The role of factor analysis in construct validity: Is it a myth?
  • Volume 10, Issue 7
  • STEPHEN C. BOWDEN (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704107091
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The role of factor analysis in construct validity: Is it a myth?
  • Volume 10, Issue 7
  • STEPHEN C. BOWDEN (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704107091
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.