Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T14:03:56.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Centuries of Demand and Supply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Robert W. Clower
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Although the ground I cover in this address is familiar, I approach it as a novice (Clower, 1973). I have written some history of economic thought papers over the past fifty years, but the bulk of my work has been theoretical; and I have known too many good historians of thought to imagine I belong in that class. As W. J. Ashley (1891) observed, “The economic historian … is apt to be confused in theory; [and] the … theorist runs the risk of being unhistorical” (compare Wicksell, 1904, p. 61). Unhistorical or not, I shall discuss some major vicissitudes of economic inquiry over the past three centuries.

Information

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 397 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, Kenneth J. and Hahn, Frank H.. 1971. General Competitive Analysis, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. and Debreu, G.. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 07, 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, W. J. 1891. “The Rehabilitation of Ricardo,” Economic Journal, 1, 09, 474–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, E. and Bridges, D.. 1970. Constructive Analysis, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Cantillon, Richard. 1755. Essai sur la nature du commerce en general, edited and with an English translation by Henry, Higgs, Frank Cass and Company Ltd., London; reissued for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Cipolla, Carlo M. 1976. Before the Industrial Revolution, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Clower, Robert. 1973. “Snarks, Quarks and Other Fictions: The Role of Formal Theory in Economic History,” in Cain, L. P. and Uselding, P. J., eds., Business Enterprise and Economic Change, Kent State University Press, Kent, 3–14.Google Scholar
Clower, Robert. 1966. Growth Without Development: An Economic Survey of Liberia, (with George, Dalton, Alan, Walters and Mitchell, Harwitz), Northwestern University Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
Clower, Robert and Peter, Howitt. 1996. “Taking Markets Seriously,” in David, Colander, ed., Beyond Microfoundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clower, Robert and Peter, Howitt. 1998. “Keynes and the Classics: An End of Century View,” in Ahiakpor, J., ed., Keynes and the Classics Reconsidered, Kluwer, Boston, 63–78.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4, 11, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Dethier, Vincent G. 1962. To Know a Fly, Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, Francis Y. 1925. Collected Papers Relating to Political Economy, 3 vols., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1950. Out of My Later Years. Philosophical Library, New York.Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood R. 1969. Perception and Discovery, Freeman, Cooper and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Henderson, Hubert. 1921. Supply and Demand, Cambridge Economic Handbook; reprint, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital; 2d ed., 1946, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. 1983. Collected Essays in Economic Theory III: Classics and Moderns, Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
Hicks, J. R. and Allen, R. G. D.. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value,” Economica, n. s., 1, February, 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, John and Mummery, A. F.. 1889. The Physiology of Industry, Murray, London.Google Scholar
Howey, R. S. 1960. The Rise of the Marginal Utility School 1870–1889, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Howitt, Peter. 1996. “Cash in Advance, Microfoundations in Retreat,” Inflation, Institutions and Information; Essays in honor of Axel Leijonhufvud, in Daniel, Vaz and Kumaraswamy, Velupillai, eds., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Howitt, Peter and Robert, Clower. 1998. “Computer Simulated Evolution of Markets and Monetary Exchange,” in preparation.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. Stanley. 1881. Richard Cantillon and the Nationality of Political Economy,” as reprinted in Cantillon, 1755, 333–60.Google Scholar
JMK is The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Macmillan, St. Martin's Press, various dates.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1935. “A Self-Adjusting Economic System?,” The New Republic, February 20, 35–37.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money, Macmillan, in JMK, 1973.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. 1917. “The Concept of Normal Price in Value and Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 32, 11, 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, John. 1705. Money and Trade Considered with A Proposal For Supplying The Nation With Money, Andrew, Anderson, Edinburgh, , reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, Andreu, Whinston, Michael D. and Green, Jerry R.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Murphy, Antoin E. 1986. Richard Cantillon: Entrepreneur and Economist, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Newcomb, Simon. 1886. Principles of Political Economy, Harper and Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jürg. 1990. A History of Economic Theory, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1957. Essays in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Thomas, V., American Heritage Series, Bobbs-Merrill, New York.Google Scholar
Polya, Georg. 1954. Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, 2 vols., Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Punzo, Lionello. 1991. “Comment,” in McKenzie, L. and Zamagni, S., eds, Value and Capital: Fifty Years Later, New York University Press, New York, 35–40.Google Scholar
Rotwein, Eugene. 1970. David Hume's Writings on Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Skinner, A. S. 1967. “Say's Law: Origins and Content,” Economica, 34, 05, 153–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, Campbell, and Skinner, A. S., general editors, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1795. The Early Writings of Adam Smith, edited by Lindgren, J. R., Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. R. J. 1770. Reflections on the Formation and the Distribution of Riches; reprint, edited by Ashley, W. J., Macmillan, New York, 1922.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1997. Advances in General Equilibrium Theory, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US.Google Scholar
Walras, Leon. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, 5th ed., 1926, translated by Jaffé, William, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Wicksell, Knut. 1904. “Ends and Means in Economics,” in Selected Papers on Economic Theory, Allen and Unwin, London, 1958.Google Scholar