Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vqtzn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T17:30:13.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IMPARTIAL SPECTATOR, MORAL COMMUNITY, AND SOME LEGAL CONSEQUENCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

MANFRED J. HOLLER  and
MARTIN LEROCH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
A Mini-Symposium on Early Law and Economics
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 297 - 316
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Berend, Daniel and Paroush, Jacob. 1998. “When is Condorcet's Jury Theorem Valid?” Social Choice and Welfare 15 (4): 481–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1994. Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract, Volume I. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken. 1998. Just Playing: Game Theory and the Social Contract, Vol. II. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. 2005. “The Return of the Imperial Hero.” New York Review of Books 52 (November 3): 55–58.Google Scholar
Cairns, John W. 1994. “Adam Smith and the Role of the Courts in Securing Justice and Liberty.” In Malloy, R. P. and Evensky, J., eds., Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 199–219.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1999. “Sympathetic Liberalism: Recent work on Adam Smith.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 28 (2): 140–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006. Justice in Robes. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Evensky, Jerry. 1994. “The Role of Law in Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy: Natural Jurisprudence and Utility.” In Malloy, R. P. and Evensky, J., eds., Adam Smith and the Philosophy of Law and Economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evenksy, Jerry. 2005. Adam Smith's Moral Philosophy: A Historical and Contemporary Perspective on Markets, Law, Ethics, and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griswold, Charles. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grofman, Bernard and Feld, Scott L.. 1988. “Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective.” The American Political Science Review 82 (2): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knut. 1981. The Science of a Legislator. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holler, Manfred J. and Napel, Stefan. 2003. “A Pragmatic Interpretation of Ken Binmore's Theory of Justice.” In Kanniainen, Vesa and Sintonen, Matti, eds., Etiikka ja Talous, Helsinki: WSOY.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1739. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd edition. Edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A., revised by Nidditch, P.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Mäki, Uskali. 2005. “Models are Experiments, Experiments are Models.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2): 303–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. 2000. “Norms, Legitimacy, and Law Enforcement.” Oregon Law Review 79 (2): 391–415.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 2006. “Progressive but Not Liberal” (Review of Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics by Michael J. Sandel, Harvard University Press). New York Review of Books 53 (May 25, 2006): 45–48.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1996. “Compassion: The Basic Social Emotion.” Social Philosophy and Policy 13 (1): 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orviska, Marta and Hudson, John. 2006. “Quiet in the Cathedral: Who is the Law Abiding Citizen?” Homo Oeconomicus 23 (2): 129–51.Google Scholar
Raphael, David D. 1975. “The Impartial Spectator.” In Skinner, A. S. and Wilson, T., eds., Essays on Adam Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 83–99.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1972. A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Hans-Bernd. 2006. “Rules versus Standards in Rich and Poor Countries: Precise Legal Norms as Substitutes for Human Capital in Low-Income Countries.” Supreme Court Economic Review 2005 (14): 113–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shavell, Steven. 2004. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1790. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1762–1766. Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by Meek, R. L., Raphael, D. D. and Stein, P. G.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1762–1763. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, edited by Bryce, J. C. and Skinner, A. S.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Witztum, Amos. 1997. “Distributive Considerations in Smith's Conception of Economic Justice.” Economics and Philosophy 13 (2): 241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar