Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-h4f6x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T20:10:16.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Well-Being: Reality's Role

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2016

ANDREW T. FORCEHIMES  and
LUKE SEMRAU
ANDREW T. FORCEHIMES
Affiliation:
NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY andrewforcehimes@gmail.com
LUKE SEMRAU
Affiliation:
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY luke.semrau@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

A familiar objection to mental state theories of well-being proceeds as follows: Describe a good life. Contrast it with one identical in mental respects, but lacking a connection to reality. Then observe that mental state theories of well-being implausibly hold both lives in equal esteem. Conclude that such views are false. Here we argue this objection fails. There are two ways reality may be thought to matter for well-being. We want to contribute to reality, and we want our experience of the world to be veridical. Yet, if one accepts that reality matters in either of these ways, one must posit differences in well-being where no such differences exist.

Keywords

well-beingmental state theoryexperience machinehedonism

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , Fall 2016 , pp. 456 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, R. M. (1999) Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bramble, B. (2016) ‘The Experience Machine’. Philosophy Compass, 11, 136–45.Google Scholar
Bykvist, K. (2010) Utilitarianism: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. L. (2002) Welfare and Rational Care. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, F. (2004) Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. (2015) ‘Well-being: What Matters beyond the Mental?’ In Timmons, M. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 210–35.Google Scholar
Hooker, B. (2015) ‘The Elements of Well-Being’. Journal of Practical Ethics, 3, 15–35.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. (2011) The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. (1992) ‘The Limits of Well-Being’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 9, 169–89.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. (1994) ‘Me and My Life’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 94, 309–24.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. (1998) Normative Ethics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1989) The Examined Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1997) Socratic Puzzles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar