Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-25T07:40:03.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rescuing the Good Samaritan: An Exposition and a Defence of the Samaritan Principle in the Welfare State*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Alec Pemberton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catholics are urged to show a ‘preferential option for the poor’. For the most part debate about the exercise of such an option is primarily in terms of a justice model—righting the twin wrongs of the ‘exploitation’ and ‘oppression’ of the poor. But there is another, largely untheorised approach to helping strangers in need—Samaritanism. This paper provides an exposition of Samaritanism and a defence of its role in the modern Welfare State. In doing so it seeks to challenge non-Christians to put their rationale for helping the needy on an equally secure footing as that provided by Christianity.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 1990 , pp. 281 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, W. (1977), ‘The right to be saved from starvation’, in Aiken, W. and Follette, H. La (eds.), World Hunger and Moral Obligation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Amundsen, D.W. and Ferngreen, G.B. (1982), ‘Philanthropy in medicine’, in Shelp, E.E. (ed.), Beneficence and Health Care, D. Reidel Pub., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Arthur, J. (1977), ‘Rights and the duty to bring aid’, in Aiken, W. and Follette, H. La (eds.), World Hunger and Moral Obligation, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Berryman, P. (1987), Liberation Theology, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Boreham, P. et al. (eds.) (1976), The Professions in Australia: A Critical Appraisal, University of Queensland Press, St. Lucia, Brisbane.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. D. (1974), ‘Humanity before justice’, British Journal of Political Science, 4, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, B. (1985), ‘Poverty in the 1980s: causes, effects, and policy options’, Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science Congress, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Dorr, D. (1983), Option for the Poor: A Hundred Years of Vatican Social Teaching, Orbis Books, New York.Google Scholar
Flew, A.G.N. (1981). The Politics of Procrustes: Contradictions of Enforced Equality, Temple Smith, London.Google Scholar
Flew, A.G.N. (1983), ‘Good Samaritans become procrusteans’, in Jones, K. and Stevenson, J. (eds.), The Yearbook of Social Policy in Britain, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (1985), Protecting the Vulnerable: Re-analysing Our Social Responsibilities, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Halmos, P. (1978), The Personal and the Political, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Harris, D. (1987), Justifying State Welfare, B. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Henderson, R. (1975), Poverty in Australia, (First Main Report), Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Holland, J. and Henriot, P. (1986), Social Analysis: Linking Faith and Justice, Orbis Books, Centre of Concern, Washington.Google Scholar
Hollenbach, D. (1979), Claims in Conflict, Paulist Press, New York.Google Scholar
Horsburgh, M. (1986), ‘Christianity and social work: some practice issues’, Social Work and Christianity, 14:2, 63–77.Google Scholar
Paul, John II (1984), Salvifici Doloris, St. Paul Publications, Homebush, Australia.Google Scholar
Paul, John II (1988), Solicitudo Rei Socialis, St. Paul Publications, Homebush, Australia.Google Scholar
McGovern, A.F. (1987), Marxism: an American Christian Perspective, Orbis Books, New York.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1988), ‘Altruism and welfare’, in Moon, J. Donald (ed.), Responsibility, Rights, and Welfare, Westview Press, Boulder and London.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J.W. (1986), Human Rights and Human Dignity, Zondervan Publishing, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
Mott, S.C. (1982), Biblical Ethics and Social Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Narveson, J. (1967), Morality and Utility, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Plant, R. et al. (1980), Political Philosophy and Social Welfare, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Penman, D. (1985), The Parables of Jesus on the Way to the Cross, Anglican Information Office, Sydney.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. (1984), Instruction on Certain Aspects of the Theology of Liberation, St. Paul Publications, Homebush, Australia.Google Scholar
Regan, R.J. (1986), The Moral Dimensions of Politics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1971), Why I Am Not a Christian, Unwin Books, London.Google Scholar
Saladin, P. (1981), ‘Christianity and human rights: a jurist's reflections’, in Lorenz, E. (ed.), How Christian are Human Rights?, World Lutheran Foundation, Geneva.Google Scholar
Shestack, J. (1984), ‘The jurisprudence of human rights’, in Meron, T. (ed.). Human Rights in International Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Shue, H. (1981), ‘Exporting hazards’, in Brown, P.G. and Shue, H. (eds.), Boundaries, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Strain, C. (ed.) (1989), Prophetic Visions and Economic Realities, W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1971), The Gift Relationship: Blood and Social Policy, Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
Wright, C.J.H. (1979), Human Rights: A Study in Biblical Themes, Grove Books, Bramcote, England.Google Scholar