Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T22:42:10.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roman Studies and Digital Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2018

Roger S. Bagnall  and
Sebastian Heath
Roger S. Bagnall*
Affiliation:
Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University
Sebastian Heath*
Affiliation:
Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, New York University
*
roger.bagnall@nyu.edu
sebastian.heath@nyu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is hardly any aspect of scholarly work and teaching in Roman Studies today not marked by digital technology. We assume that readers regularly access digital images of Roman material culture, use digitised corpora of primary sources in the original language or translation or consult online books and articles. The availability of digital resources on the internet is also a welcome enabler of ongoing public interest and even participation in the field. This overall state of affairs is generally a positive development, but both general trends and specific digital resources deserve a critical appraisal.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 108 , November 2018 , pp. 171 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ariadne 2014: Ariadne: The Way Forward to Digital Archaeology in Europe, http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/About/Ariadne-Booklet-The-Way-Forward-to-Digital-Archaeology-in-EuropeGoogle Scholar
Bagnall, R. 2016: ‘Materializing ancient documents’, Daedalus 145(2), 79–87.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, D., Bonde, S., and Kestemont, M. 2017: ‘The digital Middle Ages: an introduction’, Speculum 92(S1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1086/694236Google Scholar
Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. 2009: ‘Linked data – the story so far’, International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 5(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C., Roughan, C., and Smith, N. 2017: ‘Citation and alignment: scholarship outside and inside the Codex’, Manuscript Studies 1.1. https://repository.upenn.edu/mss_sims/vol1/iss1/2Google Scholar
Bodard, G., Cayless, H., Depauw, M., Isaksen, L., Lawrence, K., and Rahtz, S. 2017: ‘Standards for networking ancient person data: digital approaches to problems in prosopographical space’, Digital Classics Online 3(2). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-dco-379754Google Scholar
Bond, S. 2017: ‘Dear scholars, delete your account at Academia.Edu’, https://www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2017/01/23/dear-scholars-delete-your-account-at-academia-edu/Google Scholar
Bond, S., Long, H., and Underwood, T. 2017: ‘“Digital” is not the opposite of “Humanities”’, Chronicle of Higher Education Nov. 1, 2017. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Digital-Is-Not-the/241634Google Scholar
Bransbourg, G. 2012: ‘Rome and the economic integration of Empire’, ISAW Papers 3. http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/3Google Scholar
Campana, S. 2017: ‘Opitz, Rachel, Mogetta, Marcello & Terrenato, Nicola (ed.). A mid-Republican house from Gabii. Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9231782#150’, Antiquity 91(359), 1396–7.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (ed.) 2015: Images for Classicists, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Concanon, C. 2017: Assembling Early Christianity: Trade, Networks, and the Letters of Dionysios of Corinth, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crane, G. 2010: ‘Give us editors! Re-inventing the edition and re-thinking the Humanities’, in McGann, J. (ed.), Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come, Houston, 81–97.Google Scholar
Dunn, S. 2012: ‘Review of ORBIS’, Journal of Digital Humanities 1(3). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-3/review-of-orbis-project-by-stuart-dunn/Google Scholar
Elliott, T. 2014: ‘Epigraphy and digital resources’, in Bruun, C. and Edmondson, J. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Epigraphy, Oxford, 78–85.Google Scholar
Elliott, T., and Gillies, S. 2009: ‘Digital geography and classics’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.1 http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/1/000031.htmlGoogle Scholar
Elliott, T., Heath, S., and Muccigrosso, J. 2014: ‘Current practice in linked open data for the ancient world’, ISAW Papers 7. http://doi.org/2333.1/gxd256w7Google Scholar
Gezer, G. 2016: Towards a Web of Archaeological Linked Open Data. http://www.ariadne-infrastructure.eu/News/Study-Towards-a-Web-of-Archaeological-Linked-Open-DataGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, F. 2011: ‘Critical discourse in the Humanities’, Journal of Digital Humanities 12, online. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-1/critical-discourse-in-digital-humanities-by-fred-gibbs/Google Scholar
Graham, S., Milligan, I., and Weingart, S. 2015: Exploring Big Historical Data: The Historian's Macroscope, London.Google Scholar
Heath, S. 2010: ‘Diversity and reuse of digital resources for ancient Mediterranean material culture’, in Mahony, S. and Bodard, G. (eds), Digital Research in the Study of Classical Antiquity, Farnham, 35–52.Google Scholar
Kansa, E. 2012: ‘Openness and archaeology's information ecosystem’, World Archaeology 44(4), 498–520.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. 2015: ‘UK treasures endangered by museum cuts’, The Guardian Feb. 2, 2015. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/feb/10/uk-treasures-under-threat-british-museum-cutsGoogle Scholar
Kilgrove, K., and Montgomery, J. 2016: ‘All roads lead to Rome: exploring human migration to the eternal city through biochemistry of skeletons from two imperial-era cemeteries (1st–3rd c AD)’, PLOS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147585Google Scholar
Lang, S. 2018: ‘Review of Perseus Digital Library’, RIDE: Review Journal for Digital Editions and Resources 8. https://ride.i-d-e.de/issues/issue-8/perseus/Google Scholar
Mansfield, E. C. 2014: ‘Google Art Project and digital scholarship in the visual arts—http://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/project/art-project’, Visual Resources 30, 110–17.Google Scholar
Marwick, B. 2016: ‘Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: basic principles and a case study of their implementation’, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 24(1), 424–50.Google Scholar
Mattern, S. 2013: The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meadows, A., and Gruber, E. 2014: ‘Coinage and numismatic methods. A case study of linking a discipline’, ISAW Papers 7.15. http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/7/meadows-gruber/Google Scholar
Meeks, E. 2015: ‘The design and implementation of ORBIS: The Stanford geospatial network model of the Roman world’, Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology 41.2, 17–21.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, D. 2013: ‘Disciplinary impact and technological obsolescence in digital medieval studies’, in Siemens, R. and Shreibman, S. (eds), A Companion to Digital Literary Studies, Oxford, 65–81.Google Scholar
Olson, B., Placchetti, R., Quartermaine, J., and Killebrew, A. 2013: ‘The Tel Akko Total Archaeology Project (Akko, Israel): assessing the suitability of multi-scale 3D field recording in archaeology’, Journal of Field Archaeology 38, 244–62.Google Scholar
Opitz, R., Mogetta, M., and Terranato, M. (eds) 2016: A Mid-Republican House from Gabii, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, E. 2017: ‘A review of “Mid Republican House from Gabii” [digital publication]’, Internet Archaeology 45. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.45.8Google Scholar
Orlandi, S. 2016: ‘Ancient inscriptions between citizens and scholars’, in Bodard, G. and Romanello, M. (eds), Digital Classics Outside the Echo Chamber, London, 205–21.Google Scholar
Poehler, E. 2018: ‘Review of Opitz, R. , Mogetta, M. and Terrenato, N. (eds), A Mid-Republican House from Gabii. University of Michigan, 2016. Online resource. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.9231782. isbn 9780472999002. US$150.00’, Journal of Roman Studies 108. doi:10.1017/S0075435818000205.Google Scholar
Posner, M. 2016: ‘Here and there: creating DH community’, in Gold, M. and Klein, L. (eds), Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, London, 265–73.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, A., Shaw, R., Buchanan, S., Golden, P., and Kansa, E. 2016: ‘Making sense of the ways we make sense of the past: The PeriodO Project’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 59 (2), 42–55.Google Scholar
Reinhard, A. 2018: Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games, New York.Google Scholar
Romanello, M. 2016: ‘Exploring citation networks to study intertextuality in Classics’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/2/000255/000255.htmlGoogle Scholar
Roosevelt, C., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B., and Ünlüsoy, S. 2015: ‘Excavation is destruction digitization: advances in archaeological practice’, Journal of Field Archaeology 40(3), 325–46.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2014: The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sapirstein, P. 2017: ‘Review: A Mid-Republican House at Gabii’, SCS Blog. https://classicalstudies.org/scs-blog/philip-sapirstein/review-mid-republican-house-gabiiGoogle Scholar
Sapirstein, P., and Murray, S. 2017: ‘Establishing best practices for photogrammetric recording during archaeological fieldwork’, Journal of Field Archaeology 42(4), 337–50.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2013: ‘Explaining the maritime freight charges in Diocletian's Prices Edict’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 26, 464–8.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. 2014: ‘The shape of the Roman world: modelling imperial connectivity’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 27, 7–32.Google Scholar
Sheehan, B. 2015: ‘Comparing digital archaeological repositories: tDAR versus OpenContext’, Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian 4, 173–213.Google Scholar
Simon, R., Isaksen, L., Barker, E., and de Soto, P. 2016: ‘Peripleo: a tool for exploring heterogeneous data through the dimensions of space and time’, Code4Lib Journal 31. http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11144Google Scholar
Stewart, P. 2008: The Social History of Roman Art, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. 2016: ‘The promise of the digital humanities and the contested nature of digital scholarship’, in Schreibman, S., Siemens, R. and Unsworth, J. (eds), A New Companion to Digital Humanities, Chichester, 524–37.Google Scholar
Tyers, P. 1996: ‘Roman amphoras in Britain’, Internet Archaeology 1. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.1.6Google Scholar
Wigg-Wolf, D., and Duyrat, F. 2017: ‘La révolution des Linked Open Data en numismatique: les exemples de nomisma.org et Online Greek Coinage’, Archéologies numériques 1.1 https://dx.doi.org/10.21494/ISTE.OP.2017.0171Google Scholar