Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-20T12:45:51.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parametric decay of a whistler wave at the difference frequency of two electromagnetic waves in a plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

S. Guha  and
Ruby Sarkar
S. Guha
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Ravishankar University, Raipur-492 010 (M.P.), India
Ruby Sarkar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Ravishankar University, Raipur-492 010 (M.P.), India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large-amplitude whistler wave excited at the difference frequency of two high-frequency electromagnetic pump waves is shown to decay parametrically into a lower-hybrid wave (LHW) and a low-frequency ion–Bernstein wave (IBW) in a collisionless magnetized multi-ion-species plasma,. A nonlinear dispersion relation describing this parametric interaction process is derived. The low-frequency ponderomotive force along the direction of the external magnetic field leads to the dominant coupling. Possible applications to ion heating in the ionosphere, in the earth's magnetosphere and in laboratory plasmas are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 115 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Baikov, I. S. 1977 Plasma Phys. 20, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dash, S. S., Sharma, A. S. & Buti, B. 1984 J. Plasma Phys. 32, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsouleas, T. & Dawson, J. M. 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaw, P. K. & Lee, I. C. 1973 Phys. Fluids, 16, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitsenko, A. B. & Stepanov, K. N. 1973 Soviet Phys. JETP, 37, 813.Google Scholar
Krause, K., Luthen, G. & Schluter, H. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. & Sharma, R. P. 1989 Phys. Fluids B 1, 2397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsch, E. & Chang, T. 1983 J. Geophys. Res. 88, 6869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martelli, G., Giles, M. & Christiansen, P. 1974 Space Sci. Rev. 15, 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milic, B. S. & Krstic, S. R. 1987 J. Plasma Phys. 38, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ott, E. 1975 Phys. Fluids, 18, 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porkolab, M. & Chang, R. P. H. 1978 Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. R., Yashvir, & Bhatnagar, T. N. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 2.Google Scholar
Shoucri, M. M., Morales, G. J. & Maggs, J. E. 1982 Phys. Fluids 25, 1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, P. K., Yu, M. Y. & Stenflo, L. 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34, 1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, Y. K. & Sharma, R. P. 1988 Phys. Rev. A 38, 2991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar