Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T04:53:26.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crinitograptus, a new genus of Ludlow (Silurian) graptoloid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

R. B. Rickards
R. B. Rickards*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Monograptus crinitus Wood is made the type species of a new genus, Crinitograptus; a slender, nilssoni Biozone, Ludlow graptolite typified by unusual lidded thecae. Chemically isolated material from North Germany, previously placed in the genera Barrandeograptus and Pomatograptus are placed in synonymy with C. crinitus, a rare, but relatively widely recorded form. Crinitograptus crinitus is an integral part of the globally recognized Ludlow burst of evolution in the graptoloids, and it probably evolved from a nilssoni Biozone lobograptid.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 6 , November 1995 , pp. 1107 - 1111
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bouček, B. 1936. La faune graptolitique du Ludlowien inférieure de la Bohème. Rozpravy ceského Akademie, 46:1–26, 138-152.Google Scholar
Bouček, B., and Přibyl, A. 1953. On the genus Diversograptus Manck from the Silurian of Bohemia. Sbornik ustredniho Ustevu Geologického, 20:485–576.Google Scholar
Decker, C. E. 1935. Graptolites of Sylvan shale of Oklahoma, Polk Creek shale of Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology, 9:697–708.Google Scholar
Elles, G. L., and Wood, E. M. R. 1901-18. Monograph of British Graptolites. Palaeontographical Society [Monograph], Parts 1-11, p. 1–539.Google Scholar
Geinitz, H. B. 1852. Die Veriteierungen der Grauwacken-Formation (Die Graptolithen). p. 1–58, Verlgag Wilhelm Engelmann (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Harris, W. I., and Thomas, D. E. 1937. Victorian Graptolites (New Series)–pt. IV. Mining and Geological Journal 1937, p. 68–79.Google Scholar
Hutt, J. E., Rickards, R. B., and Skevington, D. 1970. Isolated Silurian Graptolites from the Bollerup and Klubbudden Stages of Dalarna, Sweden. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 4:1–23.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O. 1889. Ueber das Alter des Sogen. Graptolithen-gesteins. Deutsch Geologische Gesellschaften Zeitschrift, 41:653–716.Google Scholar
Kühne, W. G. 1955. Unterludlow-Graptolilthen aus Berliner Geschieben. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, 100:350–401.Google Scholar
Münch, A. 1938. Einige grundlegende Fragen über Bau und Struktur von Monograptus Gein. und Barrandeograptus Bouc. Sonderabdruck aus “Zeitschrift für Geschiebeforschung und Flachlands-Geologie,” 14:31–63.Google Scholar
Obut, A. M., Sobolevskaya, R. F., and Bondarev, V. I. 1965. Graptolites of the Silurian of Taimyr. Akademia Nauk SSSR Sibirskoye Institute Géologie Geofizique, p. 1–120.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B. 1973. Bipolar monograptids and the Silurian genus Diversograptus Manck. Paläontogische Zeitschrift, 47:175–187.Google Scholar
Rickards, R. B., Wright, A. D., Packham, G. H., and Williamson, P. L. 1995. The Wenlock and Ludlow Graptolite Faunas and Biostratigraphy of the Quarry Creek Region, N.S.W. Australian Journal of Palaeontology, Memoir 17, 68 p.Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1947. Graptolites of North America. Geological Society of America Memoir, 19:1–652.Google Scholar
Spassov, C. 1958. Les Fossiles de Bulgarie, 1, Ere Paléozoïque. Bulgarian Akademy Sciences, Sofia 1958, p. 1–90.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. F. 1960. The zonal distribution of Australian graptolites: with a revised bibliography of Australasian graptolites. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 94:1–58.Google Scholar
Tomczyk, H. 1956. Wenlok i Ludlow w Synklinie Kreleckiej gór $sAwietokrzysksch. Institut Geogiczny Prace, 16:1–131.Google Scholar
Tsegelnuk, P. D. 1989. Wenlock and Ludlow graptolites from Podolia. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Vilnius State University.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1966. On the morphology and evolution of the Cucullograptinae (Monograptidae, Graptolithina). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 11:291–544.Google Scholar
Urbanek, A. 1970. Neocucullograptinae n. subfam. (Graptolithina)–theirevo-lutionary and stratigraphic bearing. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 15:164–388.Google Scholar
Warren, P. T., Price, D., Nutt, M. J. C., and Smith, E. G. 1984. Geology of the country around Rhyland Denbigh. Memoir for 1:50000 geological sheets 95 and 107 and parts of sheets 94 and 106. British Geological Survey, 1–217.Google Scholar
Wood, E. M. R. 1900. The Lower Ludlow Formation and its Graptolite Fauna. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 56:415–492.Google Scholar