Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-k72x6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T06:43:29.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in the sodium content of New Zealand packaged breads: 2013 to 2023

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2025

Maria Norburg Tell*
Affiliation:
Bra Liv Öxnehaga Primary Health Care Centre, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Leanne Young
Affiliation:
Heart Foundation Senior Fellow (HE and KEB), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and The Centre for Translational Health Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Kathryn Bradbury
Affiliation:
Heart Foundation Senior Fellow (HE and KEB), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and The Centre for Translational Health Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Ella Risbrook
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Helen Eyles
Affiliation:
Heart Foundation Senior Fellow (HE and KEB), Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and The Centre for Translational Health Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
*
Corresponding author: Maria Norburg Tell; Email: maria.norburg.tell@rjl.se

Abstract

We aimed to compare the mean sodium content of New Zealand (NZ) packaged breads in 2013 and 2023 and assess compliance with the NZ Heart Foundation (HF) and World Health Organization (WHO) sodium reduction benchmarks. Sodium data were obtained from a supermarket food composition database. Mean differences between years were assessed using independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests. There was a significant reduction in the sodium content of all bread from 2013 (n=345) to 2023 (n=309) of 46 mg/100g (p<0.001). In 2013, 20% (n=70/345) of breads met the HF benchmarks, and 10% (33/345) met the WHO benchmarks; corresponding values for 2023 were 45% (n=138/309) and 18% (n=57/309) (p<0.001 for both). If continued, the modest reduction in sodium content and increase in the percentage of NZ breads meeting relevant sodium reduction benchmarks could positively affect public health, particularly if extended across the packaged food supply.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Excessive sodium intake is linked to high blood pressure (BP) and non-communicable diseases, including stroke, heart disease, and gastric cancer.(Reference He, Li and Macgregor1,Reference D’Elia, Galletti and Strazzullo2) In 2013, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that countries reduce their average population salt intake by 30% toward the upper limit of 5 g per day (2,000 mg sodium)(3) to lower elevated BP by 25% by 2025.(4) Despite NZ’s commitment and high sodium intake (NZ adults consume 3,386 mg per day),(Reference McLean, Edmonds, Williams, Mann and Skeaff5) no formal sodium reduction programme exists.(6)

To support countries in developing a national sodium reduction programme the WHO promotes an evidence-based package of five interventions known as SHAKE (Surveillance, Harness Industry, Adopt Standards for Labelling and Marketing, Knowledge, and Environment).(7) A key component of the SHAKE package is Harnessing Industry to reformulate or reduce sodium in packaged foods. Reformulation is cost-effective,(Reference Gressier, Swinburn, Frost, Segal and Sassi8Reference McLaren, Sumar and Barberio10) equitable, does not require behaviour change,(Reference Girgis, Neal and Prescott11) and if done slowly, is well-accepted by consumers.(Reference Wang and Bowman12,13)

While NZ does not currently have a formal salt reduction programme it does have two voluntary reformulation strategies 1) the Health Star Rating (HSR) front-of-pack nutrition label, a scoring system ranging from ½ (least healthy) to five (healthiest) stars(14) which also encourages healthier consumer choice, and 2) the Heart Foundation’s (HF) food industry reformulation programme which sets sodium reduction benchmarks for widely commonly consumed packaged foods(Reference Eyles and Cleghorn15), lowering them over time according to the food supply’s sodium content.(16)

From 2013 to 2019, NZ food products displaying the HSR had a 4% relative decline in sodium.(Reference Bablani, Ni Mhurchu, Neal, Skeels, Staub and Blakely17) However, the HSR is voluntary and, in 2024, was only present on 33% of eligible supermarket foods,(18) considerably limiting its potential to improve population sodium intake through reformulation or consumer food choice.(Reference Croker, Packer, Russell, Stansfield and Viner19) The HF programme has resulted in a 20 to 25% reduction in the sodium content of top-selling NZ breads (and reformulation of sodium and sugar in other categories),(20) but on its own, it is not an intensive enough intervention to drop population sodium intakes to the WHO target of 2,000 mg/day.(Reference Wang, Skeaff, Cameron, Fleming and McLean21)

In 2021, in the context of limited global action toward population sodium reduction, the WHO created global sodium reduction benchmarks for major packaged food categories(3); supporting the SHAKE package;(7) the benchmarks are stricter than those of the HF, so if implemented, will produce larger population sodium intake reductions. However, there is a lack of published data on how major dietary contributors to population sodium intake are tracking toward either set of targets.

In NZ, bread is the major staple food, with the most recent national intake data (2008/09) showing that bread contributes 11% to the energy intakes of adults; it is also the greatest contributor to dietary sodium (18%).(Reference Stefanogiannis, Lawes and Turley22) Leavened breads are the most commonly available breads in NZ, with previous research indicating their sodium content has declined e.g. by 14% from 2003 to 2013(Reference Monro, Mhurchu, Jiang, Gorton and Eyles23) and 7% from 2007 to 2010.(Reference Dunford, Eyles, Mhurchu, Webster and Neal24) However, recent changes have not been assessed.

Aims

Our primary aim was to compare the mean sodium content of NZ packaged breads in 2013 and 2023. The secondary aim was to assess the compliance of NZ breads with the NZ HF and WHO sodium reduction benchmarks.

Methods

Data on the sodium content of NZ packaged breads were taken from the Nutritrack supermarket database (2013 and 2023).(Reference Eyles25) Data on the content of lower-sodium salt substitutes in NZ breads were not included because their use in food products and as a replacement for discretionary salt in NZ is anecdotally low. Nutritrack surveys, conducted annually, involve trained personnel collecting data in four leading NZ supermarket chains: New World, Four Square, Woolworths and PAK’nSAVE. Fieldworkers use a customised smartphone app to photograph all products displaying a Nutrition Information Panel (NIP), capturing the product name, brand, nutrition labelling, ingredients and nutrition content. Data from photographs are entered into an online, searchable, web database and categorised into a standardised system.(26)

First, breads in Nutritrack with missing or nonsensical sodium data were excluded (Appendix 1). The remaining products were organised into categories defined in the HF and WHO sodium benchmark documents (Table 1). Products not aligning with any category definition were removed. Each categorisation system had different category definitions although there was considerable overlap i.e. the HF system included (1) ‘Leavened bread’ and (2) ‘Flat bread’, based on the presence or absence of yeast, baking soda, or sourdough; the WHO system included (1) ‘Sweet and Raisin bread’ based on presence of fruits or berries and (2) ‘Leavened bread’ and (3) ‘Flat bread’ following the same criteria as for HF; and the Nutritrack system included (1) ‘Fruit bread’ with the same definition as for WHO ’Sweet & raisin bread’, (2) ‘Flatbread’ with the same definition as for WHO and HF, (3) ’Gluten-free flat bread’ (4), ’Gluten-free leavened bread’, (5) ‘Wholemeal bread’, (6) ’Mixed grain bread’, (7) ‘White bread’ and (8) ‘Other bread’ (Table 1).

Table 1. Sodium content (mg/100 g) in packaged breads, overall and by bread category, in 2013 and 2023

Descriptive analyses were undertaken in SPSS 27.0.0, including the mean (standard deviation (SD)), and median (range) sodium content (mg/100g) for all products in 2013 and 2023 and separately for each of the HF, WHO, and Nutritrack categories. Where sufficient data (≥30 products per category for both years) existed, the mean difference in sodium content between years was assessed using independent t-tests for continuous variables (p<0.05). Counts and percentages of products meeting the 2024 HF(26) and 2021 WHO(3) targets current at the time of the research were evaluated separately for each year, and differences were assessed using the chi-square test (p<0.05). No corrections were made for multiple comparisons. A sensitivity analysis was also completed, including only breads available for sale in both years, thus investigating potential reformulation.

Results

The mean (SD) and median (range) sodium content of packaged breads in 2013 (n=345) and 2023 (n=309) are shown in Table 1. In 2013, the categories with the highest mean sodium content were ‘Flatbread’ (n=84, 452 mg/100g) for both the HF and WHO systems, and ‘Other bread’ (n=100, 469 mg/100g) for the Nutritrack system. In 2023, the categories with the highest mean sodium content were ‘Flatbread’ ((417 mg/100g (n=113) for the HF, 416 mg/100g (n=112) for the WHO and 429 mg/100g (n=83) for Nutritrack). In 2013, the categories with the lowest mean sodium content were ‘Leavened bread’ (436 mg/100g (n=261) for the HF and 443 mg/100g (n=245) for the WHO; and ‘Gluten-free leavened bread’ (399 mg/100g (n=32) for Nutritrack). In 2023, the categories with the lowest mean sodium content were ‘Leavened bread’ (381 mg/100g (n=196) for the HF and 387 mg/100g (n=186) for the WHO; and ‘Mixed grain bread’ at 374 mg/100g (n=61) for Nutritrack).

Over the ten years, the overall mean sodium content significantly decreased by 46 mg/100g (p<0.001). Significant reductions over time were also seen in four of the seven categories with sufficient data, i.e. ‘Leavened bread’ (HF and WHO), ‘Mixed grain bread’ and ‘Other bread’, but not ‘Flatbread’ (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Mean difference (95% CI) in the sodium content of bread by category1; between 2013 and 2023.

1The following bread categories are not presented as separate categories due to small product numbers (<30 for at least one year) making significance testing inappropriate: Nutritrack categories ‘Wholemeal bread’, ‘White bread’, ‘Fruit bread’, ‘Gluten-free flatbread’ and ‘Gluten-free Leavened bread’ and the WHO category ‘Sweet & raisin bread’. All categories are included in ‘All bread’.

Ninety (identical) breads were available for sale in both 2013 and 2023; the mean (SD) sodium content decreased from 422 mg (SD = 120) in 2013 to 384 mg (SD = 97) in 2023 (p<0.001).

In 2013, 20% (n=70/345) of all breads met the 2024 HF benchmarks, and 10% (n=33/345) met the WHO benchmarks, with significantly more products meeting the benchmarks over time (45% (n=138/309) for the HF and (18% (n=57/309) for the WHO (Appendix 2). Significantly more breads met the benchmarks for three of the seven categories with sufficient data i.e. ‘HF Leavened bread’, ‘WHO Leavened bread’ and ‘Nutritrack mixed grain bread’ (Appendix 2 and Appendix 3).

Discussion

We found a 10% decrease in the overall mean sodium content of NZ packaged breads from 2013 to 2023, with more products meeting HF and WHO sodium benchmarks over time. The mean sodium content of leavened bread decreased, but there was no significant change in other bread categories.

Our findings align with previous research for earlier timeframes undertaken by Dunford et al. (2007 to 2010)(Reference Dunford, Eyles, Mhurchu, Webster and Neal24) and Monro et al. (for 2003 to 2013),(Reference Monro, Mhurchu, Jiang, Gorton and Eyles23) suggesting that efforts to reduce sodium in NZ packaged bread have been ongoing since 2003. Similarly, in the UK, the sodium content of bread and bakery products dropped between 2006 and 2011.(Reference Eyles, Webster, Jebb, Capelin, Neal and Ni Mhurchu27)

However, there is a lack of recent data on bread intake or sales volumes, which is an important limitation hindering an evaluation of the impact of sodium reduction in bread on population sodium consumption. Nonetheless, market data indicate that while the per capita average volume of bread declined from 2018 to 2022, it is now on the rise, highlighting the importance of sodium reduction in bread for lowering population sodium intake in NZ.(28)

A key strength of our study was the use of systematically collected data from major NZ supermarkets covering ∼75% of the market.(29) The finding that sodium had reduced in all breads was consistent with the finding that sodium had reduced in breads available for sale in both years, indicating reformulation by food manufacturers had occurred over the 10-year time frame; this is supported by the fact that 62% (56/90) of breads available for sale in both years had decreased in sodium (17% (15/90) increased and 21% (19/90) had not changed).

The observed decline is encouraging; however, the mean decrease of 46 mg per 100g (∼12 mg per slice) is modest in terms of clinical significance and public health impact. An average NZ adult consumes ∼960 kJ of energy from bread or ∼2.5 slices of bread per day.(30) Therefore, the mean decrease in sodium from bread alone results in a drop of only ∼30 mg of sodium consumed per day, which is too small for a clinical benefit to BP.(Reference Aburto, Ziolkovska, Hooper, Elliott, Cappuccio and Meerpohl31) Moreover, voluntary reformulation of packaged foods alone, even if achieved in other major contributors to dietary sodium in the NZ population (processed meats, sauces, condiments, cheese and soups and stocks),(Reference Eyles and Cleghorn15) is insufficient to meet the WHO’s 2,000 mg/day sodium intake target.(3) Thus, a national sodium reduction strategy incorporating all five activities of the WHO’s SHAKE package and clinical interventions, is strongly indicated for NZ; such a strategy should incorporate the recently released comprehensive 2024 WHO benchmarks(32) and be designed to promote health equity. Concerning bread, stronger interventions from the WHO SHAKE package to Harness Industry and Adopt Standards for Labelling and Marketing are most relevant; these include making the HSR mandatory and the adoption of the WHO benchmarks by the HF.

Conclusion

We found a modest decline in the sodium content of NZ packaged breads from 2013 to 2023, with more products meeting the HF (2024) and WHO (2021) sodium benchmarks over time. Findings imply that the two national initiatives, the HSR and HF reformulation programme, are gradually reducing sodium in NZ bread. However, further reductions across the packaged food supply, alongside a comprehensive national sodium reduction strategy, are required to meet the 2,000 mg WHO sodium reduction target.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2025.10020

Acknowledgements

Fieldworkers and project management staff for the collection of 2013 and 2023 Nutritrack data. ER completed a similar, earlier analysis.

Authorship

HE conceived the study. All authors designed the study. MNT and HE cleaned the data. MNT performed the data analysis. HE created the figures. MNT and HE drafted the manuscript and all authors revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

Financial support

MNT was funded by Futurum, Region Jönköping (FUTURUM-993791), Swedish National Research School in General Practice, Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning (TG-23-0004), Svenska Läkaresällskapet (SLS-993078) and Arthur Engels Fond. HE and KEB are funded by Heart Foundation of New Zealand Senior Fellowships (#1843 & #3728679).

Competing interests

None.

References

He, FJ, Li, J, Macgregor, GA. Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;346:f1325.10.1136/bmj.f1325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Elia, L, Galletti, F, Strazzullo, P. Dietary salt intake and risk of gastric cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 2014;159:8395.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO Global Sodium Benchmarks for Different Food Categories. WHO; 2021.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
McLean, R, Edmonds, J, Williams, S, Mann, J, Skeaff, S. Balancing sodium and potassium: Estimates of intake in a New Zealand adult population sample. Nutrients. 2015;7(11):89308938.10.3390/nu7115439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) and Ministry of Health (New Zealand). Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Published 2017. Accessed April 11, 2025. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagesmh/46782006.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). The SHAKE Technical Package for Salt Reduction Internet: WHO; Published 2016. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/250135/9789241511346-eng.pdf.Google Scholar
Gressier, M, Swinburn, B, Frost, G, Segal, AB, Sassi, F. What is the impact of food reformulation on individuals’ behaviour, nutrient intakes and health status? A systematic review of empirical evidence. Obes Rev. 2021;22(2):e13139.Google Scholar
Santos, JA, Tekle, D, Rosewarne, E, et al. A systematic review of salt reduction initiatives around the world: A midterm evaluation of progress towards the 2025 Global Non-Communicable Diseases Salt Reduction Target. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(5):17681780.Google ScholarPubMed
McLaren, L, Sumar, N, Barberio, AM, et al. Population-level interventions in government jurisdictions for dietary sodium reduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9(9):Cd010166.Google ScholarPubMed
Girgis, S, Neal, B, Prescott, J, et al. A one-quarter reduction in the salt content of bread can be made without detection. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(4):616620.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, G, Bowman, BA. Recent economic evaluations of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease by reducing sodium intake. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2013;15(9):349.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. Cost Effectiveness: Reducing Sodium Intake to Reduce Blood Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases in Adults. Published 2023. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.who.int/tools/elena/interventions/sodium-cvd-adults2023.Google Scholar
Secretariat F-o-PL. Health Star Rating System Internet: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed April 11, 2025. http://www.healthstarrating.gov.au/internet/healthstarrating/publishing.nsf/Content/Home.Google Scholar
Eyles, HC, Cleghorn, CL. Dietary sources of sodium across the diverse New Zealand adult population. Prev Med Rep. 2022;29:101927.Google ScholarPubMed
Heart Foundation New Zealand. Reducing Sodium and Sugar in Processed Foods. Heart Foundation New Zealand. Published 2021. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.heartfoundation.org.nz/professionals/food-industry-and-hospitality/reducing-sodium-and-sugar-in-processed-foods.Google Scholar
Bablani, L, Ni Mhurchu, C, Neal, B, Skeels, CL, Staub, KE, Blakely, T. The impact of voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling on packaged food reformulation: A difference-in-differences analysis of the Australasian Health Star Rating scheme. PLoS Med. 2020;17(11):e1003427.Google ScholarPubMed
Front-of-Pack Labelling Secretariat. Targets and Intended Products Internet: Commonwealth of Australia. Accessed April 11, 2025. http://www.healthstarrating.gov.au/internet/healthstarrating/publishing.nsf/Content/target-and-intended-products.Google Scholar
Croker, H, Packer, J, Russell, SJ, Stansfield, C, Viner, RM. Front of pack nutritional labelling schemes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent evidence relating to objectively measured consumption and purchasing. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020;33(4):518537.10.1111/jhn.12758CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, NX, Skeaff, S, Cameron, C, Fleming, E, McLean, RM. Sodium in the New Zealand diet: Proposed voluntary food reformulation targets will not meet the WHO goal of a 30% reduction in total sodium intake. Eur J Nutr. 2022;61(6):30673076.10.1007/s00394-022-02864-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanogiannis, N, Lawes, CM, Turley, M, et al. Nutrition and the burden of disease in New Zealand: 1997-2011. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(4):395401.Google ScholarPubMed
Monro, D, Mhurchu, CN, Jiang, Y, Gorton, D, Eyles, H. Changes in the sodium content of New Zealand processed foods: 2003–2013. Nutrients. 2015;7(6):40544067.10.3390/nu7064054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunford, EK, Eyles, H, Mhurchu, CN, Webster, JL, Neal, BC. Changes in the sodium content of bread in Australia and New Zealand between 2007 and 2010: Implications for policy. Med J Aust. 2011;195(6):346349.10.5694/mja11.10673CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyles, H. The Nutritrack Database: An Annually Updated Database of Information on Packaged Foods and Beverages Sold at Major Supermarkets in New Zealand (2013 to 2023). The University of Auckland; 2024.Google Scholar
New Zealand Heart Foundation. Heart Foundation Food Categories and Reformulation Targets - Summary. Published 2024. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.heartfoundation.org.nz/professionals/food-industry-and-hospitality/reducing-salt-and-sugar-in-processed-foods2024.Google Scholar
Eyles, H, Webster, J, Jebb, S, Capelin, C, Neal, B, Ni Mhurchu, C. Impact of the UK voluntary sodium reduction targets on the sodium content of processed foods from 2006 to 2011: Analysis of household consumer panel data. Prev Med. 2013;57(5):555560.Google ScholarPubMed
Statista. Bread in New Zealand Internet: Statista. Published 2025. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/food/bread-cereal-products/bread/new-zealand.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health Innovation. The Nutritrack Database. Auckland (NZ): National Institute for Health Innovation; Published 2021. Accessed February 21, 2022. https://diet.auckland.ac.nz/projects/nutritrack.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health. A Focus on Nutrition: Key Findings of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey Wellington: Ministry of Health. Published 2011. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/2011-10/a-focus-on-nutrition-v2.pdf.Google Scholar
Aburto, NJ, Ziolkovska, A, Hooper, L, Elliott, P, Cappuccio, FP, Meerpohl, JJ. Effect of lower sodium intake on health: Systematic review and meta-analyses. BMJ: Br Med J. 2013;346:f1326.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO Global Sodium Benchmarks for Different Food Categories, 2nd ed. Published 2024. Accessed April 11, 2025. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/97892400920132024.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Sodium content (mg/100 g) in packaged breads, overall and by bread category, in 2013 and 2023

Figure 1

Figure 1. Mean difference (95% CI) in the sodium content of bread by category1; between 2013 and 2023.1The following bread categories are not presented as separate categories due to small product numbers (<30 for at least one year) making significance testing inappropriate: Nutritrack categories ‘Wholemeal bread’, ‘White bread’, ‘Fruit bread’, ‘Gluten-free flatbread’ and ‘Gluten-free Leavened bread’ and the WHO category ‘Sweet & raisin bread’. All categories are included in ‘All bread’.

Supplementary material: File

Tell et al. supplementary material 1

Tell et al. supplementary material
Download Tell et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 19.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tell et al. supplementary material 2

Tell et al. supplementary material
Download Tell et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 74.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Tell et al. supplementary material 3

Tell et al. supplementary material
Download Tell et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 14.6 KB