Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T06:01:35.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flight test assessment of L1 and dual-frequency multi-constellation SBAS for civil aviation in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2025

Christopher Marshall ,
Eldar Rubinov ,
Chris Lambert ,
Julian Barrios ,
Miguel A. Fernández  and
Fernando Bravo
Christopher Marshall*
Affiliation:
FrontierSI, Level 17, Tower 4 Collins Square, 727 Collins Street, 3008, Melbourne, Australia Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
Eldar Rubinov
Affiliation:
FrontierSI, Level 17, Tower 4 Collins Square, 727 Collins Street, 3008, Melbourne, Australia
Chris Lambert
Affiliation:
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
Julian Barrios
Affiliation:
GMV, Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain
Miguel A. Fernández
Affiliation:
GMV, Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain
Fernando Bravo
Affiliation:
GMV, Isaac Newton, 11 P.T.M. Tres Cantos, 28760, Madrid, Spain
*
Corresponding author: Christopher Marshall; Email: christopher.marshall@outlook.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the performance of the Australian and New Zealand Satellite-Based Augmentation System (Aus-NZ SBAS) test-bed to evaluate its use in civil aviation applications with a focus on dual-frequency multi-constellation (DFMC) signals. The Aus-NZ SBAS test-bed performance metrics were determined using kinematic data recorded in flight across a variety of environments and operational conditions. A total of 14 tests adding up to 32 h of flight were evaluated. Flight test data were processed in both the L1 SBAS and DFMC SBAS modes supported by the test-bed broadcasts. The performance results are reviewed regarding accuracy, availability and integrity metrics and compared with the requirement thresholds defined by the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for Precision Approach (PA) flight operations. The experimentation performed does not allow continuity assessment as specified in the standard due to a long-term statistical requirement and inherent limitations imposed by the reference station network. Analysis of flight test results shows that DFMC SBAS provides several performance improvements over single-frequency SBAS, tightening both horizontal and vertical protection levels and resulting in greater service availability during the approach.

Keywords

SBASDFMCpositioning accuracyintegrity

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 78 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 123 - 148
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Navigation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barrios, J., Caro, J., Calle, J. D., Carbonell, E., Pericacho, J. G., Fernández, G., Esteban, V. M., Fernández, M. A., Bravo, F., Torres, B., Calabrese, A., Diaz, A., Rodríguez, I., Laínez, M. D., Romay, M. M., Jackson, R., Reddan, P. E., Bunce, D. and Soddu, C. (2018). Update on Australia and New Zealand DFMC SBAS and PPP System Results. Proceedings of the 31st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2018), Miami, Florida, September 2018, pp. 1038–1067. doi:10.33012/2018.15932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrios, J., Pericacho, J. G., Calabrese, A., Fernández, G., Esteban, V. M., Fernández, M. A., Bravo, F., Calle, J. D., Torres, B., Figueiras, J. P., Wojciech, K., Caro, J., Jackson, R., Reddan, P. E., Bunce, D. and Soddu, C. (2020). Australia and New Zealand SBAS and PPP Testbed: Achievements After Three Years of Service. Proceedings of the 33rd International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 2020), September 2020, pp. 1394–1432. doi:10.33012/2018.15932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cézon, A., Cueto, M., Ramírez, E., Ostolaza, J., Izquierdo, V., Pérez, D. and Sardón, E. (2014). SBAS Performance Analysis in Equatorial Regions. Proceedings of the 27th International Technical Meeting of the ION Satellite Division, ION GNSS+ 2014, Tampa, Florida, pp. 2410–2430.Google Scholar
DFMC. (2017). EUROCAE WG62, Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Galileo/Global Positioning System/Satellite-Based Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. DFMC SBAS L5 MOPS Draft v0.3.8, 10th Mar 2017. Saint-Denis, France: EUROCAE.Google Scholar
EUROCAE. (2019). ED-259 - Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Galileo - Global Positioning System - Satellite-Based Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. ED-259. Saint-Denis, France: EUROCAE. [Online] https://eshop.eurocae.net/eurocae-documents-and-reports/ed-259.Google Scholar
EY. (2019) SBAS Test-bed Demonstrator Trial Economic Benefits Report. Sydney, Australia. https://frontiersi.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SBAS-Economic-Benefits-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
Hernando, C., Marquez, A., Pintor, P., Roldán, R., Alvaréz, J. M. and Lorenzo, J. M. (2015). SBAS CAT-I Capability in Europe: The LPV-200 Service. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2015, Tampa, Florida, pp. 1565–1595.Google Scholar
ICAO. (2016). Aeronautical Telecommunications: International Standards, Recommended Practices and Procedures for air Navigation Services: Annex 10 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, 7th ed. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
Misra, P. and Enge, P. (2012). Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance. Lincoln, MA: Ganga-Jamuna Press.Google Scholar
Roturier, B., Chatre, E. and Ventura-Traveset, J. (2001). The SBAS Integrity Concept Standardised by ICAO. Application to EGNOS. Proceedings of ION GNSS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
RTCA. (2016). DO-229E Minimum Operational Performance Standards for Global Positioning System Airborne Equipment.Google Scholar
Sanz Subirana, J., Juan Zornoza, J. M. and Hernández-Pajares, M. (2013). GNSS Data Processing, Vol. 1: Fundamentals and Algorithms. Noordwijk, Netherlands: ESA Communications.Google Scholar
Tossaint, M., Samson, J., Toran, F., Ventura-Traveset, J., Sanz, J., Hernandez-Pajares, M. and Juan Zornoza, J. M. (2006). The Stanford - ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity. Proceedings ION GNSS 2006, Fort Worth, TX, pp. 894–905.Google Scholar