Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T04:55:47.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Piezoelectric and pyroelectric behavior of lead zirconate titanate–lead sulfide–glass nanocomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. K. Kundu ,
D. Chakravorty  and
L. E. Cross
T. K. Kundu
Affiliation:
Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Calcutta, 700 032, India
D. Chakravorty
Affiliation:
Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Calcutta, 700 032, India
L. E. Cross
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

Composites containing micron-sized lead zirconate titanate and nanometer-sized lead sulfide in a glass matrix were prepared using a sol-gel technique. The PbS size ranged from 3.5 to 15.3 nm. It was possible to pole some of these nanocomposites. The measured values of saturation polarization, remanent polarization, and coercive field showed an increase as the PbS particle size was enhanced. The composites exhibited improvement in the piezoelectric and pyroelectric behavior as compared to that of the base glass-ceramic.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , May 1999 , pp. 1796 - 1800
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Lines, M.E. and Glass, A.M., Principle and Application of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials (Clarendon, Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
2.Ting, R. Y., Ferroelectrics 102, 215 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Newnham, R.E., Xu, Q.L., Kumar, S., and Cross, L. E., Ferroelectrics 102, 259 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Glass, A.M., Lines, M. E., Nassau, K., and Shiever, J.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 249 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Takashige, M., Nakamma, T., Ozawa, H., Ino, R., Tsuyo, N., and Arai, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 19, L255 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Takashige, M., Mitsui, T., Nakamma, T., Aikawa, Y., and Jang, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 20, L159 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kundu, T.K. and Chakravorty, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2732 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Mukherjee, M., Datta, A., and Chakravorty, D., J. Mater. Res. 12, 2507 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Sawyer, C.B. and Tower, C.H., Phys. Rev. B 35, 269 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Meson, W.P., Piezoelectric Crystal and Their Application to Ultrasonics (D. Van Nostrand, New York, 1950).Google Scholar
11.Roy Chowdhury, P., Indian J. Phys. 67A (3), 207 (1993).Google Scholar
12.Kundu, T.K., Mukherjee, M., Chakravorty, D., and Cross, L.E., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 4380 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar