Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-01T02:37:16.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of Cu–In–Se–N and Cu–In–Se thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Shigemi Kohiki ,
Mikihiko Nishitani ,
Takayuki Negami  and
Takahiro Wada
Shigemi Kohiki
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd., Moriguchi, Osaka 570, Japan
Mikihiko Nishitani
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd., Moriguchi, Osaka 570, Japan
Takayuki Negami
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd., Moriguchi, Osaka 570, Japan
Takahiro Wada
Affiliation:
Central Research Laboratories, Matsushita Electric Ind. Co. Ltd., Moriguchi, Osaka 570, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The Cu, In, and Se core-level electron binding energies of the p-type Cu–In–Se–N thin film were larger than those of the n-type Cu–In–Se thin film. The positive shift of the core-electron binding energies for the Cu–In–Se–N film is consistent with that expected from the conduction types of the films. Holes were positioned in the Cu–Se antibonding orbitals of the Cu–In–Se–N film. The analysis using the Auger parameter revealed that the Cu–Se bonding interaction is stronger for the Cu–In–Se–N film than for the Cu–In–Se film.

Information

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , August 1992 , pp. 1984 - 1986
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Samaan, N. Y., Vaidhyanathan, R., and Noufi, R., Solar Cells 16, 181 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kohiki, S., Nishitani, M., Negami, T., Nishikura, K., and Hirao, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1749 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Kohiki, S., Nishitani, M., Nishikura, K., Negami, T., Terauchi, M., and Hirao, T., Thin Solid Films 207, 265 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jaffe, J. E. and Zunger, A., Phys. Rev. B 28, 5822 (1983); Phys. Rev. B 29, 1882 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Shirley, D. A., J. Electron Spectrosc. 5, 135 (1974); Phys. Rev. A 7, 1520 (1973); Chem. Phys. Lett. 17, 312 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kowalczyk, S. P., Pollak, R. A., McFeely, F. R., Ley, L., and Shirley, D. A., Phys. Rev. B 8, 2387 (1973).Google Scholar
7.Kowalczyk, S. P., Ley, L., McFeely, F. R., Pollak, R. A., and Shirley, D. A., Phys. Rev. B 9, 381 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wagner, C. D., Faraday Disc. Chem. Soc. 60, 291 (1975); C. D. Wagner, L. H. Gale, and R. H. Raymond, Anal. Chem. 51, 466 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Thomas, T. D., J. Electron Spectrosc. 20, 117 (1980).Google Scholar
10.Kohiki, S., Nishitani, M., Negami, T., and Wada, T., Phys. Rev. B 45, 9163 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar