Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-05T01:34:50.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successor characteristics, change in the degree of firm internationalization, and firm performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Wen-Ting Lin  and
Yunshi Liu
Wen-Ting Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, College of Management, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan
Yunshi Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our study examines the relationship among successor characteristics, post-succession firm change in the degree of internationalization, and firm performance. We use the upper echelon, organization change, and contingency perspectives to frame our conceptual arguments. Based on data from 187 succession observations for listed companies in Taiwan between 2000 and 2005, we find that firms will opt for higher levels of change in their degree of internationalization when they experience outside succession and that the negative impact of change in the degree of firm internationalization on subsequent firm performance is relatively low. We extend the industrial environment, explaining the moderating effect of chief executive officer succession on change in the international strategy model. Outsider successors foster a greater degree of change in the level of firm internationalization when the industrial environment is munificent or complex.

Keywords

successionchange in the degree of internationalizationenvironmental uncertaintysubsequent organizational performance

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 16 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Andersson, S. (2000). The internationalization of the firm from an entrepreneurial perspective. International Studies of Management and Organization, 30, 63–92.Google Scholar
Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. (2000). Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management team of MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 471–487.Google Scholar
Ballinger, G. A., & Marcel, J. J. (2010). The use of an interim CEO during succession episodes and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 262–283.Google Scholar
Barkema, H. G., & Shvyrkov, O. (2007). Does top management team diversity promote or hamper foreign expansion? Strategic Management Journal, 28, 663–680.Google Scholar
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 7–26Google Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1992). Transnational management: Text, cases, and readings in cross-border management. Chicago: Irwin.Google Scholar
Berrone, P., & Geomez–Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 103–126.Google Scholar
Boeker, W. (1997). Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 152–170.Google Scholar
Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1993). Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 172–186.Google Scholar
Bogner, B., & Barr, P. (2000). Making sense in hypercom-petitive environments: A cognitive explanation for the persistence of high velocity competition. Organization Science, 11, 212–226.Google Scholar
Bonn, I., & Pettigrew, A. (2009). Towards a dynamic theory of boards: An organisational life cycle approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
Bowen, H., & Wiersema, M. (2005). Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal 26, 1153–1171.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 301–312.Google Scholar
Bradford, D. L., & Burke, W. W. (2005). Reinventing Organization Development. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. (1993). Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 763–793.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A. (2000). The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26, 1179–1198.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 533–545.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, G. M. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30, 749–778.Google Scholar
Castrogiovanni, G. J. (1991). Environmental munificence: A theoretical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16, 542–565.Google Scholar
Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitive analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21, 100–134.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 81–112.Google Scholar
Clark, E., & Soulsby, A. (2007). Understanding top management and organizational change through demographic and processual analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 932–954.Google Scholar
Contractor, F. J., Kumar, V., & Kundu, S. K. (2007). Nature of the relationship between international expansion and performance: The case of emerging market firms. Journal of World Business, 42, 401–417.Google Scholar
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). International experience in the executive suite: The path to prosperity? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 515–523.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 749–762.Google Scholar
Datta, D. K., & Rajagopalan, N. (1998). Industry structure and CEO characteristics: An empirical study of succession events. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 833–852.Google Scholar
Datta, D. K., Rajagopalan, N., & Zhang, Y. (2003). New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: The moderating role of industry characteristics. British Journal of Management, 14, 101–114.Google Scholar
DeSarbo, W. S., & Grewal, R. (2008). Hybrid strategic groups. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 293–317.Google Scholar
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 52–73.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576.Google Scholar
Ferrier, W. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 858–877.Google Scholar
Filatotchev, I., & Piesse, J. (2009). R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1260–1276.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 179–199.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Boyd, B. (1998). How much does the CEO matter? The role of managerial discretion in the setting of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 179–199.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Topmanagement-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 484–503.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, S. D., & Saul, K. (1991). A leader's wake: Organization member reactions to CEO succession. Journal of Management, 17, 619–642.Google Scholar
Furtado, E., & Karan, V. (1990). Causes, consequences and shareholder wealth effects of management turnover: A review of empirical evidence. Financial Management, 19, 60–75.Google Scholar
Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 654–681.Google Scholar
George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31, 210–233.Google Scholar
Giambatista, R. C., Rowe, W. G., & Riaz, S. (2005). Nothing succeeds like succession: A critical review of leader succession literature since 1994. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 963–991.Google Scholar
Greiner, L. E., Cummings, T. G., & Bhambri, A. (2003). When new CEOs succeed and fail: 4-D theory of strategic transformation. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 1–16.Google Scholar
Grimm, C., Lee, H., & Smith, K. (2006). Strategy as action: Competitive dynamics and competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E. Jr., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D., & Abrahamson, E. (1995). Assessing managerial discretion across industries: A multi-method approach. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1427–1441.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32, 334–343.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Schecter, S. M. (1983). Turnaround strategies for mature industrial-product business units. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 231–248.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993). Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 401–418.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. E., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Bailey, E. E. (2005). External succession and disruptive change: Heirs-apparent, forced turnover and firm performance. Strategic Organizations, 3, 47–83.Google Scholar
Hennart, J.-F. (1993). Explaining the Swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of ‘market’ and ‘hierarchy’. Organization Science, 4, 529–547.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. H., & Datta, D. K. (2002). CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 551–570.Google Scholar
Herrmann, P. H., & Datta, D. K. (2006). CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry mode. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 755–778.Google Scholar
Hinings, C. R., & Greenwood, R. (1988). The dynamics of strategic change. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1137–1157.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., & Johnson, R. A. (1992). Corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect on diversification strategy and R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 625–634.Google Scholar
Hsu, P. S. C. (1997). Familism, professionalism and entrepreneurship – In the perspective of Chinese business firms. Management Review (In Chinese), 16, 1–9.Google Scholar
Isabella, L. A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7–41.Google Scholar
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm – a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.Google Scholar
Karaevli, A. (2007). Performance consequences of new CEO ‘Outsiderness’: Moderating effects of pre- and post-succession contexts. Strategic Management Journal 28, 681–706.Google Scholar
Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570–598.Google Scholar
Kesner, I. F., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Top management turnover and CEO succession: An investigation of the effects of turnover on performance. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 701–713.Google Scholar
Kesner, I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present and future. Journal of Management, 20, 327–372.Google Scholar
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8, 11–26.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. (1991). Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37, 19–33.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1982). The general managers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 585–608.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management Science, 37, 1–19.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W., Shaver, J. M., & Yeung, B. (1992). Getting there in a global industry: Impacts on performance of changing international presence. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 419–432.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ocasio, W. (1994). Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in U.S. industrial corporations, 1960–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 285–312.Google Scholar
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 45–64.Google Scholar
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). The internationalization of entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 2–8.Google Scholar
Palmer, T. B., & Wiseman, R. M. (1999). Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1037–1062.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, N., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1997). Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 22, 48–79.Google Scholar
Ruzzier, M., Antoncic, B., Hisrich, R. D., & Konecnik, M. (2007). Human capital and SME internationalization: A structural equation modeling study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 24, 15–29.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. (1998). Internationalization and firm governance: The role of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 158–178.Google Scholar
Schleifer, A., & Summers, L. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers. In Auerbach, A. J. (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: causes and consequences (pp. 33–56). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2002). Revisiting the performance consequences of CEO succession: The impacts of successor type, postsuccession senior executive turnover, and departing CEO tenure. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 717–733.Google Scholar
Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 31–49.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. E., & Eden, L. (2004). What is the shape of the multinationality-performance relationship? Multinational Business Review, 12, 89–101.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, L. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 171–222). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Rosenkopf, L. (1996). Executive succession, strategic reorientation and performance growth: A longitudinal study in the U. S. cement industry. Management Science, 42, 939–953.Google Scholar
Virany, B., Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1992). Executive succession and organization outcomes in turbulent environments: An organization learning approach. Organization Science, 3, 72–91.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74–92.Google Scholar
Wiersema, M. F. (1995). Executive succession as an antecedent to corporate restructuring. Human Resource Management, 34, 185–202.Google Scholar
Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1989). Effects of environmental scarcity and munificence on the relationship of context to organizational structure. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 131–156.Google Scholar
Yip, G. S., Biscarri, J. G., & Monti, J. A. (2000). The role of the internationalization process in the performance of newly internationalizing firms. Journal of International Marketing, 8, 10–35.Google Scholar
Zajac, E. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Blind spots in industry and competitor analysis: Implications of interfirm perceptions for strategic decisions. Academy of Management Review, 16, 37–56.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2006). The presence of a separate COO/president and its impact on strategic change and CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 283–300.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2003). Explaining new CEO origin: Firm versus industry antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 327–338.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2004). When the known devil is better than an unknown god: An empirical study of the antecedents and consequences of relay CEO successions. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 483–500.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 334–346.Google Scholar