Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-2bdfx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-09T11:34:53.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of board gender diversity and sustainability committees on environmental performance: a quantile regression approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2022

Hussain Muhammad Open the ORCID record for Hussain Muhammad [Opens in a new window]  and
Stefania Migliori Open the ORCID record for Stefania Migliori [Opens in a new window]
Hussain Muhammad*
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Business Administration, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro, n. 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy
Stefania Migliori
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Business Administration, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, Viale Pindaro, n. 42, 65127 Pescara, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Hussain Muhammad, E-mail: hussain.muhammad@unich.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the effect of board gender diversity (BGD) and sustainability committees on environmental performance. Using a quantile regression approach and a sample of publicly listed firms in Italy, we find that BGD and sustainability committees have different effects on firms' environmental performance over different points of conditional distribution. This shows that BGD and sustainability committees have greater quantitative impact in firms performing better environmentally and are positively related to environmental performance. We further discover that large Italian firms that reach a critical mass of three female directors maintain a stronger attitude towards environmental sustainability. Overall, the results confirm that BGD and sustainability committees enhance board effectiveness and help promote sustainable environmental initiatives. This study provides empirical evidence from a context that has not yet been investigated. It further augments the literature by employing a quantile regression approach, mostly unexamined by previous studies.

Keywords

Board gender diversitycritical mass of female directorsenvironmental performancequantile regression analysissustainability committees

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , November 2023 , pp. 1051 - 1076
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alazzani, A., Hassanein, A., & Aljanadi, Y. (2017). Impact of gender diversity on social and environmental performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(2), 266–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., & Iriberri, N. (2012). The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Science, 58(1), 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baalouch, F., Ayadi, S. D., & Hussainey, K. (2019). A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: Evidence from French listed companies. Journal of Management and Governance, 23(4), 939–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Barka, H., & Dardour, A. (2015). Investigating the relationship between director's profile, board interlocks and corporate social responsibility. Management Decision, 53(3), 553–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, P. K., Mansi, M., & Pandey, R. (2018). Board composition, sustainability committee and corporate social and environmental performance in Australia. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(4), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchinsky, M. (1998). Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 88–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chams, N., & García-Blandón, J. (2019). Sustainable or not sustainable? The role of the board of directors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 1067–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciocirlan, C., & Pettersson, C. (2012). Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of Fortune 500 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2018). Women on corporate boards: Do they advance corporate social responsibility? Human Relations, 71(7), 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual-class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. J., & Freudenburg, W. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 302–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Masi, S., Słomka-Gołębiowska, A., Becagli, C., & Paci, A. (2021). Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1865–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschênes, S., Rojas, M., Boubacar, H., Prud'homme, B., & Ouedraogo, A. (2015). The impact of board traits on the social performance of Canadian firms. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmaghrabi, M. E. (2021). CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), 892–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkut, S., Kramer, V. W., & Konrad, A. M. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? Women on Corporate Boards of Directors, 222–232. doi: 10.4337/9781848445192.00028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(1), 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Martín, C. J., & Herrero, B. (2020). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J., & Di Nardo, J. (2007). Econometric methods. Irvine: University of California.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. F. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzey, C., Uyar, A., Nizaeva, M., & Karaman, A. S. (2021). CSR performance and firm performance in the tourism, healthcare, and financial sectors: Do metrics and CSR committees matter?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking agency theory: The view from law. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 294–314.Google Scholar
Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., Mora, A., & Scapin, M. (2017). The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. (2015). Moving beyond the linear regression model: Advantages of the quantile regression model. Journal of Management, 41(1), 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.Google Scholar
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Ferrero, J., Lozano, M. B., & Vivas, M. (2021). The impact of board cultural diversity on a firm's commitment toward the sustainability issues of emerging countries: The mediating effect of a CSR committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, P., & Wang, M. (2017). CSR performance in China: The role of board gender and foreign ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 72–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, S. (2009). Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelon, G., & Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhammad, H., Migliori, S., & Mohsni, S. (2021). Corporate governance and R&D investment: The role of debt financing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1–26. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtab056.Google Scholar
Nadeem, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in initial public offering prospectuses? Evidence from China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(2), 100–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, M. (2021). Corporate governance and supplemental environmental projects: A restorative justice approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A., & Iqbal, U. (2020a). Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3146–3161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeem, M., Gyapong, E., & Ahmed, A. (2020b). Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1268–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuber, C., & Velte, P. (2021). Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 1958–1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orazalin, N. (2020). Do board sustainability committees contribute to corporate environmental and social performance? The mediating role of corporate social responsibility strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2015). Boards and sustainability: The contingent influence of director interlocks on corporate environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 499–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, G. F., & Romi, A. M. (2014). Does the voluntary adoption of corporate governance mechanisms improve environmental risk disclosures? Evidence from greenhouse gas emission accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York, NY: Harper and Row. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392573.Google Scholar
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015). From board composition to corporate environmental performance through sustainability-themed alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, K. K., Tilt, C. A., & Lester, L. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental reporting: An Australian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(2), 143–163.Google Scholar
Rodrigue, M., Magnan, M., & Cho, C. H. (2013). Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, R. S. (2012). Governance, media and the quality of environmental disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(6), 610–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saggese, S., Sarto, F., & Viganò, R. (2021). Do women directors contribute to R&D? The role of critical mass and expert power. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(2), 593–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarah, C., & Mona, L. K. (2008). Critical mass theory and women's political representation. Political Studies, 56(3), 725–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2017). Gender and board activeness: The role of a critical mass. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 751–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwirplies, C. (2018). Citizens’ acceptance of climate change adaptation and mitigation: A survey in China, Germany, and the US. Ecological Economics, 145, 308–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoham, A., Almor, T., Lee, S. M., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017). Encouraging environmental sustainability through gender: A micro-foundational approach using linguistic gender marking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(9), 1356–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundarasen, S. D. D., Je-Yen, T., & Rajangam, N. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal, 33(8), 885–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 105(3), 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T. F. L. (2001). Toward a capabilities perspective of the small firm. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(3), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar