Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-s7dlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-26T10:12:19.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

R. M. W. Dixon, Linguistic Science and Logic. (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 28). The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1963. Pp. 108.

Review products

R. M. W. Dixon, Linguistic Science and Logic. (Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 28). The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1963. Pp. 108.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

P. H. Matthews
P. H. Matthews
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , April 1965 , pp. 61 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Allen, W. S. (1956). Structure and System in the Abaza verbal complex. TPhS. 127–176.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1957). Aspiration in the Hāṛautī nominal. Studies in Linguistic Anaīysis. (Special Volume of the Philological Society.) Oxford: Blackwell. 68–86.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Lg. 2. 153–164.Google Scholar
Carnochan, J. (1957). Gemination in Hausa. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. 149–181.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. (Janua Linguarum, No. 4.) ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1961). On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects. (Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathcmatics, Vol. 12.) Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1962). The logical basis of linguistic theory. Preprints of Papers for the Ninth International Congress of Linguists. Cambridge, Mass.509–574.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1963). A logical statement of grammatical theory. Lg. 39. 654–668.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1963). The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19. 208–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1951). General linguistics and descriptive grammar. TPhS. 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. 1–32.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17. 241–292:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1963). Class in relation to the axes of chain and choice in language. Linguistics 2. 5–15.Google Scholar
Hill, A. A. (1958). Introduction to Linguistic Structures. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1961). Linguistic elements and their relations. Lg. 37. 29–53.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. & Pendergraft, E. D. (1963a). Final Report on Machine Translation Study. Austin, Tex.: Linguistic Research Center, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. & Pendergraft, E. D. (1963b). Symposium on the Current Status of Research. Austin, Tex.: Linguistic Research Center, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1958). Linguistic Hierarchy. Lingua 7. 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of Human behavior, Vol. 1. Glendale, Calif.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1964). Constituent Structure. (Publication 30 of the Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.) IJAL 30. 1. Part III.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1958). Substitutions and syntactical research. ArchL 10. 37–42.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1959). In defence of WP. TPhS. 116–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1963). General Linguistics in Great Britain 1930–1960. Trends in Modern Linguistics (ed. Mohrmann, C., Norman, F. and Sommerfelt, A.). Utrecht/Antwerp: Spectrum. 11–37.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1955). Cours de linguistique générale, 5th ed.Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Simon, H. F. (1958). Some remarks on the structure of the verb complex in standard. Chinese. BSOAS 21. 553–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spang-Hanssen, H. (1961). Glossematics. Trends in European and American Linguistics 1930–1960 (ed. Mohrmann, C., Sommerfelt, A. and Whatmough, J.). Utrecht & Antwerp: Spectrum. 128–164.Google Scholar
Uldall, H. J. (1957). Outline of Glossematics, Part I. (TCLC 10. 1.) Copenhagen: Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.Google Scholar
Wells, R. S. (1947). Immediate constituents. Lg. 33. 81–117.Google Scholar
Wells, R. S. (1951). Review of Recherches Structurales (TCLC 5). Lg. 27. 554–570.Google Scholar